طراحی و تدوین الگویی برای ارزشیابی اثربخشی و عملکرد اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان شرقی
الموضوعات :
اسدالله خدیوی
1
,
آیدا الهوردی خان وزیری
2
1 - استادیار مدیریت آموزشی ، دانشگاه فرهنگیان ،تبریز،ایران
2 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تبریز، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، تبریز،ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: عملکرد, اعضای هیأت علمی, الگوی ارزشیابی عملکرد, تعهد حرفه ای,
ملخص المقالة :
هدف پژوهش حاضر طراحی و تدوین الگویی برای ارزشیابی اثربخشی و عملکرد اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان شرقی بوده است. روش پژوهش توصیفی- پیمایشی و جامعه آماری آن شامل تمامی اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان شرقی در سال تحصیلی 93-92 برابر 1950 نفر می باشد .حجم نمونه بر اساس جدول مورگان، 320 نفر برآورد گردیده است. برای انتخاب نمونه از روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای و در دل خوشه ها از روش طبقه ای نسبتی استفاده شده است.با مطالعه مبانی و پیشینه تحقیق، مؤلفه های الگوی ارزشیابی استخراج و زیر طبقات هر مؤلفه نیز به طور جداگانه مشخص شدند. سپس با الهام از مؤلفه های اصلی و فرعی ابزار پژوهش در قالب پرسش نامه 80 سؤالی بسته پاسخ در طیف لیکرت تنظیم گردید. روایی پرسش نامه با استفاده از روایی صوری و پایایی آن با بهره گیری از تکنیک آلفای کرونباخ 95% محاسبه گردید.نتایج آزمون تحلیل عاملی نشان دادکه هفت مؤلفه تعهد حرفه ای، فعالیت های پژوهشی، توسعه حرفه ای، تدریس و فعالیت های آموزشی، مشاوره، خدمات اجرایی و علمی و فعالیت های سیاسی و اجتماعی الگوی ارائه شده مورد تأیید هستند.
Bland C. J. (2002). Evaluating Faculty Performance: A Systematically Designed and Assessed Approach. Academic Medicine, 5(1), 30-77.
- Chenari, A. R., Sharifi, H. P., & Ghurchian, N. Gh. (2011). Providing a Model for Assessing the Professional Capabilities of Non-medical Faculty Members of Azad University. Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 2, 13-28, (In Persian).
- Dunn, V. (2000). Principal Leadership for Equity and Excellence, a Case Study of an Inclusive Exemplary School, PhD Thesis, University of Huston.
- Gordon P. A. (2005). Running Head: Student Evaluations of College Instructors. Accessible at: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/ whuitt/files/tcheval.html.
- Halimi, S. M. (2010). Formulation and Prioritization of Performance Standards for Primary School Teachers in Tabriz. Master's Thesis, Tabriz: Islamic Azad university, (In Persian).
- Jesarati, A. (2012). The Evaluation Valuation Indicators of Performance of Faculty Members of Islamic Azad University of Tabriz and Providing a Suitable Model for It. Master's Thesis, Tabriz: Islamic Azad university, (In Persian).
- Quenin, S. (1994). The Use of Performance Indicators in Universities: An International Survey. Jess Caking Slay
- Rajabi, S., & Papzan, A. H. (2010). Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Designing a Tool for Evaluating the Performance of Faculty Members. Iranian Higher Education, 1, 151-169, (In Persian).
- Safi, M. H., Falahi Khoshtab, M., Rasel, M., & Rahgozar, M. (2011). Determine and Prioritize the Needs of Faculty Members Based on the Kano Model. Payesh, 4, 459-468, (In Persian).
- Staples J. (2005). Department of Family Practice Community Health, University of Minnesota: Faculty Evaluation and Merit Review System, Scale Rating the Quality Productivity of Research and Research Related. Accessible at: http://www.med.Umn.edu fp/ rsrch/ pdfs/research.pdf.
- The University of California. (2005). Mentoring Handbook; Mentored Clinical Research Training Program. Accessible at: http://www.som.ucdavis.edu/students/k30/StrategicCareerDevelopmn/ MCRTP.Complete.Handbook.Pdf.
- The University of North Carolina at Pembroke. (2000). Accessible at: http://www.Uncp.edu./aa/handbook/01-02/pdf/Chapter_4A-1_11.6.PDF.
- Malehshahi, F., Shikhian, A., & Tarrahi, M. J. (2010). A Survey on the Viewpoints of Students of Lorestan Medical Sciences about the Priorities of Faculty Evaluation. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research, 19, 16-24, (In Persian).
- Marks, B. K. (1999). The Faculty Evaluation System. Accessible at: http://www.shsu.edu/vaf,www/aps/820317.html.
- Mesdaghkhah, M., & Saket Chaghush, A. R. (2011). Designing a Model for Performance Evaluation of Valuable Institutions by Case Study: Basij Mostazafan Organization. Journal of Islamic Management, 1, 201,223, (In Persian).
- Washington State University. (2005). Section XI. Annual Performance Review. Accessible at: http://www.nursing.wsu.edu /fm/ Section XI_05.pdf.
_||_
Bland C. J. (2002). Evaluating Faculty Performance: A Systematically Designed and Assessed Approach. Academic Medicine, 5(1), 30-77.
- Chenari, A. R., Sharifi, H. P., & Ghurchian, N. Gh. (2011). Providing a Model for Assessing the Professional Capabilities of Non-medical Faculty Members of Azad University. Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 2, 13-28, (In Persian).
- Dunn, V. (2000). Principal Leadership for Equity and Excellence, a Case Study of an Inclusive Exemplary School, PhD Thesis, University of Huston.
- Gordon P. A. (2005). Running Head: Student Evaluations of College Instructors. Accessible at: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/ whuitt/files/tcheval.html.
- Halimi, S. M. (2010). Formulation and Prioritization of Performance Standards for Primary School Teachers in Tabriz. Master's Thesis, Tabriz: Islamic Azad university, (In Persian).
- Jesarati, A. (2012). The Evaluation Valuation Indicators of Performance of Faculty Members of Islamic Azad University of Tabriz and Providing a Suitable Model for It. Master's Thesis, Tabriz: Islamic Azad university, (In Persian).
- Quenin, S. (1994). The Use of Performance Indicators in Universities: An International Survey. Jess Caking Slay
- Rajabi, S., & Papzan, A. H. (2010). Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Designing a Tool for Evaluating the Performance of Faculty Members. Iranian Higher Education, 1, 151-169, (In Persian).
- Safi, M. H., Falahi Khoshtab, M., Rasel, M., & Rahgozar, M. (2011). Determine and Prioritize the Needs of Faculty Members Based on the Kano Model. Payesh, 4, 459-468, (In Persian).
- Staples J. (2005). Department of Family Practice Community Health, University of Minnesota: Faculty Evaluation and Merit Review System, Scale Rating the Quality Productivity of Research and Research Related. Accessible at: http://www.med.Umn.edu fp/ rsrch/ pdfs/research.pdf.
- The University of California. (2005). Mentoring Handbook; Mentored Clinical Research Training Program. Accessible at: http://www.som.ucdavis.edu/students/k30/StrategicCareerDevelopmn/ MCRTP.Complete.Handbook.Pdf.
- The University of North Carolina at Pembroke. (2000). Accessible at: http://www.Uncp.edu./aa/handbook/01-02/pdf/Chapter_4A-1_11.6.PDF.
- Malehshahi, F., Shikhian, A., & Tarrahi, M. J. (2010). A Survey on the Viewpoints of Students of Lorestan Medical Sciences about the Priorities of Faculty Evaluation. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research, 19, 16-24, (In Persian).
- Marks, B. K. (1999). The Faculty Evaluation System. Accessible at: http://www.shsu.edu/vaf,www/aps/820317.html.
- Mesdaghkhah, M., & Saket Chaghush, A. R. (2011). Designing a Model for Performance Evaluation of Valuable Institutions by Case Study: Basij Mostazafan Organization. Journal of Islamic Management, 1, 201,223, (In Persian).
- Washington State University. (2005). Section XI. Annual Performance Review. Accessible at: http://www.nursing.wsu.edu /fm/ Section XI_05.pdf.
