An analysis of the application of the concept of urban self-organization in neighborhoods development (Case Study: Sabzevar city)
الموضوعات : Space Ontology International Journal
Fateme Saffarsabzevar
1
(
Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
)
Maryam Daneshvar
2
(
Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
)
Toktam Hanaee
3
(
Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
)
Seyed Moslem Seyed Alhoseini
4
(
Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Sabzevar, Multi grounded theory, Neighborhoods Development, Urban Self-Organization,
ملخص المقالة :
Although citizen participation in the neighborhood-centered approach is a key issue, there is ample evidence that the implementation of participatory approaches has led to disappointing results. According to researchers, the concept of urban self-organization can provide a way out of this dilemma for planners. Despite the importance of this issue, so far, no research has been done on how to use this concept in the process of planning and development of neighborhoods and cities in Iran. The present study tries to examine and analyze how to apply the concept of urban self-organization in the development of neighborhoods in Iran. A case study of this research is Sabzevar city and the research method is multi-ground theory. The analysis of the collected data led to the extraction of 547 primary codes, 77 concepts, and 31 categories. Finally, the abstracted categories and the relationships between them were drawn and presented in a model. According to the findings of this study, the pattern of self-organized participation of citizens in neighborhood development is a transparent, borderless, sustainable, and technology-based network that connects all actors involved in neighborhood development. This pattern brings about the integrated development of neighborhoods and through very soft and gradual changes, creates huge changes in the cities.
Boonstra, B., & Boelens, L. (2011). Self-organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research & Practice, 4 (2), 99–122.
Bruijn, E., & Gerrits, L. (2018). Epistemic Communities in Urban Self-organization: A Systematic Review and Assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 33(3), 310-328.
Cevallos, E. S. P. (2014). Self-organization and urban cycling in Quito: the role and influence of civil society in alternative mobility policies and planning. MSc Programme in Urban Management and Development, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eizenberg, E. (2019). Patterns of self-organization in the context of urban planning: Reconsidering venues of participation. Planning Theory. 18 (1), 40- 57.
Eizenberg E and Shilon M (2016) Pedagogy for the new planner: Refining the qualitative toolbox. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43(6): 1118–1135
Fridman. J. (1993). Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning. APA Journal, 482-485.
Goldkuhl, G., & Cronholm, S. (2010). Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: Toward multi-grounded theory. International journal of qualitative methods, 9 (2), 187-205.
Hasanov, M., & Beaumont, J. (2016). The value of collective intentionality for understanding urban self-organization. Urban Research & Practice, 9 (3), 231-249.
Hasanov, M., Zuidema, C. (2018). The transformative power of self-organization: Towards a conceptual framework for understanding local energy initiatives in The Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, (37), 85–93.
Horelli, L., Saad-Sulonen, J., Wallin, S., & Botero, A. (2015). When Self-Organization Intersects with Urban Planning: Two Cases from Helsinki. Planning, Practice & Research, 30 (3), 286–302.
Korah, P. I., Cobbinah, P. B., & Nunbogu, A. M. (2017). Spatial Planning in Ghana: Exploring the Contradictions. Planning Practice & Research, 32 (4), 361-384.
Meerkerk, I. v., Boonstra, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2013). Self-Organization in Urban Regeneration: A Two-Case Comparative Research. European Planning Studies, 21 (10), 1630–1652.
Nunbogu, A. M., & Korah, P. I. (2016). Self- organisation in urban spatial planning: Evidence from the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana. Urban Research & Practice, 10 (4), 423-441.
Saffar Sabzevar, F., Daneshvar, M., Hanaee, T., Seyedolhosseini, S. (2020). Identification of the urban self-organization's dimensions and components using the meta-synthesis method. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(4), 53-71. [In Persian]
Saffar Sabzevar, F., Daneshvar, M., Hanaee, T., Seyedolhosseini, S. (2021). Urban self-organization in practice: identifying a model for understanding collective action in neighborhoods of Sabzevar City. Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 10(37), 35-50. [In Persian]
Tempels, L., & Pessoa, M. (2021). Self-organized initiatives: a planners’ subversive tool for fragmented urban spaces. International planning studies, 26(4), 387- 398.
Wallin, S. (2019). Managing urban complexity: Participatory planning, self-organization, and co-production of urban space. (Published doctoral dissertation). Aalto University, School of Engineering, Department of Built Environment
Zhang, S., De Roo, G., & Rauws, W. (2020). Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(2), 287-303.
