چالش‌های دانشگاه در تدوین محتوای متناسب با شایستگی‌های یادگیرنده مادام العمر

الموضوعات : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی

صدیقه کریمی ¹ (دانشگاه اصفهان)
احمدرضا نصر ² (انشگاه اصفهان)
مصطفی شریف ³ (دانشگاه اصفهان)

تاريخ الإرسال : 27 الثلاثاء , محرم, 1439 تاريخ التأكيد : 27 الثلاثاء , محرم, 1439 تاريخ الإصدار : 21 الخميس , ذو الحجة, 1437

الکلمات المفتاحية: محتوای برنامه درسی, دانشگاه, یادگیرنده مادام العمر, شایستگی, چالش,

ملخص المقالة :

پژوهش حاضر در صدد شناسایی چالش‌های دانشگاه در انتخاب و سازماندهی محتوا مطابق با اصول یادگیری مادام العمر است. در این تحقیق ترکیبی، در بخش کیفی با روش تحلیل محتوا دیدگاه‌های 24 نفر از مدیران دانشگاه‌های دولتی که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از نوع زنجیره‌ای انتخاب شده‌اند، از طریق مصاحبه نیمه سازمان یافته جمع‌آوری شده است. در بخش کمی نیز با روش توصیفی ـ پیمایشی دیدگاه 153 نفر از اعضای هیأت علمی این دانشگاه‌ها که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شده‌اند، از طریق پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بررسی شده است. روایی محتوای آن توسط متخصصان تأیید و پایاییش با آلفای کرونباخ 96/0 برآورد گردید. داده‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های آمار توصیفی و استنباطی و نرم افزار spss17 تحلیل شده‌اند. یافته‌ها حاکیست چالش‌های دانشگاه هنگام انتخاب و سازماندهی محتوا عبارتند از: کاربردی نبودن آموخته‌ها، عدم آشنایی با روش تحقیق در رشته تحصیلی، بی‌توجهی به آموزش یک زبان بین المللی، عدم استفاده از محتوای میان رشته‌ای، تأکید کم بر توانایی‌های عمومی و بی‌توجهی به کیفیت کار پژوهشی دانشجو. میان دیدگاه اعضای هیأت علمی برحسب متغیرهای جنس، نوع دانشگاه، مرتبه علمی و تحصیلات در سطح 05/0=p تفاوت معنادار وجود ندارد.

المصادر:

Barnet, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of super complexity. London: The society for research into higher education and open university.
Bridges, D. (2000). Back to the future: The higher education curriculum in the 21st century. Combridge journal of education. Vol[ l30], No1, PP:37-55.
Candy, P.; Cerbert, G. and Oleary, J. (1994). Developing lifelong learners, through undergraduate education. Canbera: Astralian Government Publishing Service.
Cannon, R.; New Bell, D. (2006). Help improve teaching in universities and higher education institutions. Translated by:Ahmad Reza Nasr, Hassan Zare and Mohammad Jafar Pakseresht. Isfahan University Press and Samt [Persian]
Carria, A.M.R. (2007). Leaning in higher education: Strategies to overcome challenges faced by adult student lessons dream from two case studies in Portagal. Portegal: ISCAP/IPP and universidade do Minho.
Chambers, J.(2010). The learning society. CICO Systems.Inc.
Danderea, V. and Gosling, D. (2001). Joining the dots: Reconceptuali educational development . Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol 69, No 2, PP43- 55.
Davis, M. (2003). Barriers to reflective practice: The changing nature of higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education,Vol 24, No 4, PP 243- 255.
Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. Retrieved from: www.leeds.ac.uk/ educol/niche/.
Delanty, G. (2003). Ideologies of knowledge society and cultural. Contradiction of higher education. Policy of Futures in Education, Vol 11, No1, PP 71- 82.
Dohman, G. (1996). Life long learning: Guidelines for a modern education policy. Bonn: Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology.
Duke, CH. (2002). Managing the learning University. USA: SRHE and Open University Press.
Dey Huggett, K.; Smith, N. and Conrand, C. F. (1999). Higher Education curriculum. Traditional and contemporary national report on the undergraduate curriculum.
Entwistle, N. J. (2007). University teaching and student understanding: research guiding good practice. London: Ppaigrave-Macmillan.
Farmahini, M. ( 2000). Descriptive dictionary of Education. Tehran:Asrar Danesh. [Persian]
Farasatkhah M., (2008). Examining how quantitative and qualitative increase access to higher education in Iran. Journal of Higher Education, Vol2,No 2, PP 95-122.[ Persian]
Gallagher Brett, A. (2004). Seven hundred reason for studing languages. Retrieved from: www.llas.ac.uk/700 reasons.
George, R. (2000). Preparing student for a flexible society: An institutional strategy for developing lifelong learning. Retrieved from: www.canberra,edu,.au/ Learning connection/ disab/ pathway/ 20conference/ 2paper htm.
Honey, P. (2001). An identikit picture of a lifelong learner. Retrieved from: http://www.peterhoney.com/article/70.
Jarvis, P. (2008). Globalization, lifelong learning and the learning society. London and New York: Routledge.
Javdani, H. (2005). A research project to investigate ways to increase access to higher education. Tehran: Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education (unpublished). [Persian]
Knapper, Ch. and Croply, A. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Kohonen, V. (2007). Foreign language education through transformative teacher growth. Finland: University of Helsink.
Maleky, H. (2006). Curriculum (manual operation). Mashhad: Payam Andishe. [Persian]
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2004). Learning Society and question -based education theory. In: Articles Collections in order to commemorate Dr. Ali Mohamed Cardan. Tehran: Sammt. [Persian]
Naji S. (2005). New way to the development of scientific research. Included in Abstract of The development of science and technology conference. Tehran: Sharif University. [Persian]
Ocanada, B. (2001). Continual learning in the new marketplace. The school administrator. Marsh.
Ouane, A. (2002). Key competencies for lifelong learning. In: Institutionalising lifelong learning. Unesco Institute for Education. PP 311-325.
Sepehr. H. ( 2000). Higher Education and Growth of software development movement. In: Articles Collections of Conference on Higher Education and Sustainable Development. Vol 2. PP327-343. [Persian]
Shahtalebi, S.; Tasdighi, F. & Nasr, A.R. (2015). You should know that what the challenges of teaching at the university are?!. Research in Curriculum Planning,Vol 12, No17, PP15-25. [Persian]
Smith, J. and Spurling, A. (1999). Lifelong learning: Riding the tiger. London and New York: Cassel.
Strain, M. (2000). Schools in a learning society: New purposes and modalities of learning in late modern society. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Vol 28, No 2, PP 280- 298.
Super, D. E.; Busshuff, L. and Pellerano, J. and Watts, A. G. (1987). The guidance function of educational contest. In: Curricula and lifelong learning. UNESCO: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Toynton, R. (2005). Degrees of disciplinary in equipping mature students in higher education for engagement and success in lifelong learning. Active learning in Higher Education, Vol 6, No1, PP 105-117.
UNESCO. (1998). Learning: the treasure within. Translated by Office of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Education. Tehran: Tazkieh. [Persian]
UNESCO. (2009). Towards a knowledge based society. Translated by Hassan Ghasemi and Cyrus Azadi. Tehran: Samt[Persian].
Warren, D. (2002). Curriculum design in a context of widening participation in higher education. London: Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. Vol l1, No1, PP 85-99.
Watterston, J. (2001). Learning that lasts: Lifelong learning and the knowledge economy. Retrieved from: http://www.icponline.org/featurearticles/f701.htm.
Woolsey, N. (1999). Students for foreign language learning in 21st century. Retrieved from: www.foreign language.org/.
World Bank. (2008). Lifelong learning in a knowledge-based economy. Translated by Mustafa Imad Zadeh; Farimah Kasaeian, Isfahan University Jahad publications. [Persian]