CLT in Prospect Series: A Predictive Evaluation of Iranian Junior High School English Textbooks
الموضوعات : Research in English Language PedagogyAhmad Goodarzi 1 , Hiwa Weisi 2 , Nouroddin Yousofi 3
1 - English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 - English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
3 - English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: coursebook evaluation, Creature Potential, Content Analysis, Cognitive Potential, Prospect Series, Communicative Potential,
ملخص المقالة :
Textbooks have a chief standing as an essential element of language teaching; therefore, analyzing and evaluating them is imperative to guarantee their efficiency and consistency with the objectives set and expected in language classes. Hence, this study utilizing a Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) model, examined Cognitive, Communicative, and Creature potentials of three Iranian recently published junior high school English textbooks, called Prospect Series. The results showed that the intended books aiming at following the CLT approach failed to satisfy communicative, cognitive, and creative potentials sufficiently and some crucial ingredients of CLT, such as strategy instruction, use of authentic materials, and skills integration. Additionally, the over-emphasis on Iranian culture caused sociocultural aspects of CLT to be relatively neglected in this series, and foreign cultures are roughly avoided. Although the development of the Prospects is surely a step forward toward designing high-quality Iranian English textbooks in Iranian schools, progressive modifications on textbooks are always needed to reach their greatest formats. The findings of this study have useful implications for the Iranian stakeholders in the field of teaching English as a foreign language and the authors of the Prospect series in terms of revising and modifying activities to achieve the highest congruency with CLT tenants.
Aftab, A. (2011). English language textbooks evaluation in Pakistan (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kheirabadi, R., & Alavi Moghaddam, B. (2016). Textbook evaluation of prospect series: A paradigm shift from GTM to CLT in Iran. Journal of Teaching and Research, l7(3), 25-42.
Alavimoghadam, B., Kheirabadi, R., Foroozandeh, E., Sharabyani, Sh., Anani Sarab, M. R., & Ghorbani, N. (2013). Prospect 1. Tehran: Iran School Books Publication Company.
Alavimoghadam, B., Kheirabadi, R., Foroozandeh, E., Sharabyani, Sh., Anani Sarab, M. R., & Ghorbani, N. (2014). Prospect 2. Tehran: Iran School Books Publication Company.
Alavimoghadam, B., Kheirabadi, R., Foroozandeh, E., Sharabyani, Sh., Anani Sarab, M. R., & Ghorbani, N. (2015). Prospect 3. Tehran: Iran School Books Publication Company.
Alishahi, M. H., Ghanizadeh, A., & Hosseini, A. (2019). Designing supplementary materials for prospect series and probing their impact on emotional facet and perceptions. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 7(1), 137-166.
Brown, H., D. (2001). Teaching by principles. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. London: Heinemann.
Dubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course design: Developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eghtesadi, A. R., & Hassanabadi, S. (2016). An evaluation of in-service training courses for the seventh grade English package for Iranian schools (prospect 1). Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 130-143.
Hutchinson, T. & Torrres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
Kamyabi Gol, A., & Baghaeeyan, J. (2015). Critical analysis and teachers’ perspectives on prospect one (Iranian junior high school English book). International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 1(4), 14-25.
Kheirabadi, R., & Alavimoghaddam, S. B. (2016). Evaluation of Prospect series: A paradigm shift from GTM to CLT in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 619-624.
Kiany, G. R., Mahdavy, B., & Ghafar Samar, R. (2011). Towards a harmonized foreign language education program in Iran: National policies and English achievement. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 2(3), 462-469.
Mohammadi, P. (2017). Implementing the CIPP evaluation model (context, input, process, and product) in evaluating the ninth grade junior school EFL textbook “prospect 3” in Iran (Unpublished M.A. thesis). Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran.
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Safari, P., & Sahragard, R. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers' challenges with the new ELT program after the reform: from dream to reality. Khazar Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 18(4), 65-88.
Sardabi, N., & Koosha, M. (2017). New perspective in prospect: an assessment of strengths and weaknesses of Iranian second-year junior high school English textbooks. Research in English language pedagogy, 3(2), 57-70.
Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative Competence. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7.
Shahmohammadi, S. (2018). Textbook evaluation: looking at Prospect series through teachers’ perspective. Research in English Language Pedagogy (RELP), 6(2), 182.
Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.
Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 432-453). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H., & Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal, 55(1), 80-101.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143-179.
Torki, F., & Chalak, A. (2017). An evaluation of English textbooks used in Iranian high schools: teachers’ and learners’ attitudes. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 5(1), 52-60.
Widdowson, H. G. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, K. H. (2010). The Relationship between Language Learners' Anxiety and Learning Strategy in the CLT Classrooms. International Education Studies, 3(1), 174-191.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2000). Reflections on the treatment and contextualization of pronunciation practices and language functions in the pre-university textbooks in Iran. Journal of Teaching Languages, 1(3), 1-21.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V. (2018). English in contemporary Iran. Asian Englishes, 20(1), 81-94.
Zohoorian, Z., MatinSadr, N., & Shamabadi, F. (2018). A Summative Evaluation of 'Prospect 1': Employing the ARCS Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 449-462.
