شناسایی و واکاوی قوانین و مقررات حقوقی و پزشکی رحم اجاره‌ای
الموضوعات :
1 - استادیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، البرز، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: رحم اجاره‌ای, پزشکی, قوانین و مقررات, حقوقی,
ملخص المقالة :
مقدمه: در دنیای امروز با توجه به بحران سلامت محیط زیست و شیوع ناباروری موضوع رحم اجاره ای در بین بسیاری از جوامع شایع شده است و پرداختن به مقررات این حوزه مهم است. هدف اصلی این مقاله واکاوی قوانین و مقررات حقوقی رحم اجاره‌ای است.روش پژوهش: روش انجام پژوهش آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) است. برای انجام این پژوهش از روش مطالعۀ اسنادی بهره گرفته شد که از 506 مقاله 30 مقاله انتخاب گردید و در نهایت با استفاده از تکنیک تحلیل مضمون با نرم افزار MAXQDA12، برای واکاوی قوانین مرتبط با موضوع استفاده شد. جامعۀ آماری در این پژوهش گروهی از خبرگان حوزۀ حقوق پزشکی در زمینه رحم اجاره ای بودند که بعد از انجام 15 مصاحبه اشباع نظری صورت گرفت. مصاحبه ها بین 75 تا 120 دقیقه به طول انجامید. در نهایت با روش ّتی تک نمونه ای با جامعۀ آماری 30 نفر 15 خبره و 15 خانواده (8 خانواده اجاره کننده و 7 زن اجاره دهنده) مضامین پایه، سازمان‌دهنده و فراگیر استخراج و در بخش کمی، تعیین میزان اهمیت استفاده از قوانین حقوقی و پزشکی تحلیل شد.یافته ها: در این پژوهش در حدود 30 مقاله مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت: 12 مقاله فارسی و 18 مقاله انگلیسی. در روش تحلیل مضمون با استفاده از مضامین پایه، سازمان دهنده و فراگیر 46 شاخص، 4 مقوله و 2 بعد در دو بخش حقوقی و پزشکی به صورت مجزا بررسی شدند.نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج حاکی از آن است که مقررات حقوقی شامل رسمی (قوانین و مقررات مربوط به قانون اساسی) و عرفی (قوانین و مقررات مربوط به اجاره دهنده و اجاره کننده) و قوانین پزشکی شامل اجاره دهندۀ رحم و اجاره کننده بود و در نهایت در بخش کمی نیز مشخص گردید تمام مقررات از اهمیت بالایی برخوردارند مخصوصاً قوانین و مقررات حقوقی با میانگین 4/2 دارای اهمیت بیشتری از قوانین و مقررات پزشکی با 3/9 است.
1- Khatam M., Yaghoubipoor A., montazeri M. Analysis of Relationships between Antecedents Affecting Bureaucracy Phobia Using Fuzzy Demitel Technique Case Study: One of the Medical Universities in Iran. Journal of healthcare management, 2021; 12(2): 87-98. [In persioan]
2- Kazeminia M., Khatony A., jafari F. Assessing Good Governance in the Dimensions of Quality, Effectiveness and Accountability in the Health System of Iran and Selected Countries: A Comparative Study. Journal of healthcare management, 2022; 12(4): 7-18. [In persioan]
3- Safari M, Shahini M. Natural Termination of Surrogacy Contract. MLJ, 2021; 15(56): 261-281. [In persioan]
4- Ramazani S. Jurisprudential and legal analysis of alternative uterus from the perspective of a woman who has a uterus. Biannual Journal of Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence and Jurisprudential Principles of Islamic Schools, 2021; 4(1): 75-52. [In persioan]
5- Nusrat, M. H. Artificial insemination from the point of view of the jurisprudence of Ahl al-Bayt, peace be upon him. Essays in medical jurisprudence, 2021(1), 121-93. [In persioan]
6- Mohaghegh Damad M U, Boazar R. Feasibility study of drafting a law regarding the reduction of embryos (with a jurisprudential and legal approach). MLJ, 2021; 15(56): 75-87. [In persioan]
7- Lotfi, H A. Surrogacy from the point of view of Ahl al-Bayt and Sunni jurisprudence. Essays in Medical Jurisprudence, 2021; 1(1): 149-178. [In persioan]
8- Ahmadinejad M. Legal reflection on the Judgments Issued by the European Court of Human Rights on the Surrogacy. MLJ. 2021; 15(56): 317-333. [In persioan]
9- Patel RV, Govani ND, Govani DR. Oocyte Donation and Surrogate Pregnancy-Fertility Options and Challenges, Possibilities and Opportunities for a Patient with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. Medp J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022; 1(1): mpog-202203001. Medpress Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ramnik V. Patel, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Child Health & Research and KT Children Government University Teaching Hospital, Rajkot.; 360005.
10- Puspitasari DE. The Legal Status of Surrogate Mothers in Indonesia. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2022 May 16; 3(1): 19-28.
11- Lahl J, Fell K, Bassett K, Broghammer F, Eastman M, Briggs W. A Retrospective Comparison of American Women’s Spontaneous Conceptions and Gestational Surrogate Pregnancies. Zarvandi Rahmani M. An Evaluation of Precautionary Arguments with the Approach of Permitting Artificial Insemination in a Surrogate Uterus. Fiqh, 2021 Sep 23; 28(107): 178-99.
12- Kim M. The Regulatory-Permitted Approach for Responsible Uses of Commercial Surrogacy: Who Cares about Surrogates in the Commercial Practice of Gestational Surrogacy? Quinnipiac Health LJ, 2022; 25: 1.
13- Ahuja KK, Macklon N. Vitrification and the demise of fresh treatment cycles in ART. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2020 Aug 1; 41(2): 217-24.
14- Cutting E, Catt S, Vollenhoven B, Mol BW, Horta F. The impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on fertility patients and clinics around the world. Reproductive biomedicine online, 2022 Apr 1; 44(4): 755-63.
15- Golombok S, Blake L, Slutsky J, Raffanello E. Roman G.D, Ehrhardt A. Parenting and the adjustment of children born to gay fathers through surrogacy. Child Develop, 2018; 89: 1223–1233.
16- Hemalal S, Yee S, Ross L, Loutfy M, Librach C. Same-sex male couples and single men having children using assisted reproductive technology: a quantitative analysis. Reprod. Biomed, 2021; 42: 1033–1047.
17- Jacobson H. Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase? Reprod. Biomed. Soc, 2020; 14: 42–47.
18- Lindheim SR, Madeira JL, Ludwin A, Kemner E, Parry JP, Sylvestre G, Pennings G. Societal pressures and procreative preferences for gay fathers successfully pursuing parenthood through IVF and gestational carriers. Reprod Biomed Soc Online, 2019 Oct 26; 9: 1-10
19- Cornet-Bartolomé, D., Rodriguez, A., García, D., Barragán, M., Vassena, R. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles. Hum. Reprod, 2020; 35: 2262–2271.
_||_1- Khatam M., Yaghoubipoor A., montazeri M. Analysis of Relationships between Antecedents Affecting Bureaucracy Phobia Using Fuzzy Demitel Technique Case Study: One of the Medical Universities in Iran. Journal of healthcare management, 2021; 12(2): 87-98. [In persioan]
2- Kazeminia M., Khatony A., jafari F. Assessing Good Governance in the Dimensions of Quality, Effectiveness and Accountability in the Health System of Iran and Selected Countries: A Comparative Study. Journal of healthcare management, 2022; 12(4): 7-18. [In persioan]
3- Safari M, Shahini M. Natural Termination of Surrogacy Contract. MLJ, 2021; 15(56): 261-281. [In persioan]
4- Ramazani S. Jurisprudential and legal analysis of alternative uterus from the perspective of a woman who has a uterus. Biannual Journal of Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence and Jurisprudential Principles of Islamic Schools, 2021; 4(1): 75-52. [In persioan]
5- Nusrat, M. H. Artificial insemination from the point of view of the jurisprudence of Ahl al-Bayt, peace be upon him. Essays in medical jurisprudence, 2021(1), 121-93. [In persioan]
6- Mohaghegh Damad M U, Boazar R. Feasibility study of drafting a law regarding the reduction of embryos (with a jurisprudential and legal approach). MLJ, 2021; 15(56): 75-87. [In persioan]
7- Lotfi, H A. Surrogacy from the point of view of Ahl al-Bayt and Sunni jurisprudence. Essays in Medical Jurisprudence, 2021; 1(1): 149-178. [In persioan]
8- Ahmadinejad M. Legal reflection on the Judgments Issued by the European Court of Human Rights on the Surrogacy. MLJ. 2021; 15(56): 317-333. [In persioan]
9- Patel RV, Govani ND, Govani DR. Oocyte Donation and Surrogate Pregnancy-Fertility Options and Challenges, Possibilities and Opportunities for a Patient with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. Medp J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022; 1(1): mpog-202203001. Medpress Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ramnik V. Patel, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Child Health & Research and KT Children Government University Teaching Hospital, Rajkot.; 360005.
10- Puspitasari DE. The Legal Status of Surrogate Mothers in Indonesia. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2022 May 16; 3(1): 19-28.
11- Lahl J, Fell K, Bassett K, Broghammer F, Eastman M, Briggs W. A Retrospective Comparison of American Women’s Spontaneous Conceptions and Gestational Surrogate Pregnancies. Zarvandi Rahmani M. An Evaluation of Precautionary Arguments with the Approach of Permitting Artificial Insemination in a Surrogate Uterus. Fiqh, 2021 Sep 23; 28(107): 178-99.
12- Kim M. The Regulatory-Permitted Approach for Responsible Uses of Commercial Surrogacy: Who Cares about Surrogates in the Commercial Practice of Gestational Surrogacy? Quinnipiac Health LJ, 2022; 25: 1.
13- Ahuja KK, Macklon N. Vitrification and the demise of fresh treatment cycles in ART. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2020 Aug 1; 41(2): 217-24.
14- Cutting E, Catt S, Vollenhoven B, Mol BW, Horta F. The impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on fertility patients and clinics around the world. Reproductive biomedicine online, 2022 Apr 1; 44(4): 755-63.
15- Golombok S, Blake L, Slutsky J, Raffanello E. Roman G.D, Ehrhardt A. Parenting and the adjustment of children born to gay fathers through surrogacy. Child Develop, 2018; 89: 1223–1233.
16- Hemalal S, Yee S, Ross L, Loutfy M, Librach C. Same-sex male couples and single men having children using assisted reproductive technology: a quantitative analysis. Reprod. Biomed, 2021; 42: 1033–1047.
17- Jacobson H. Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase? Reprod. Biomed. Soc, 2020; 14: 42–47.
18- Lindheim SR, Madeira JL, Ludwin A, Kemner E, Parry JP, Sylvestre G, Pennings G. Societal pressures and procreative preferences for gay fathers successfully pursuing parenthood through IVF and gestational carriers. Reprod Biomed Soc Online, 2019 Oct 26; 9: 1-10
19- Cornet-Bartolomé, D., Rodriguez, A., García, D., Barragán, M., Vassena, R. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles. Hum. Reprod, 2020; 35: 2262–2271.
