ارزیابی عملکرد دانش آموزان پیش و پس از مشارکت دادن والدین در آموزش ریاضی با روش تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها (DEA)

الموضوعات :

سید احسان حقی ¹ (گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)
محسن رستمی مال خلیفه ² (گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)
محمد حسن بهزادی ³ (گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)
احمد شاهورانی ⁴ (گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)

تاريخ الإرسال : 05 الأربعاء , محرم, 1441 تاريخ التأكيد : 25 الجمعة , ربيع الأول, 1441 تاريخ الإصدار : 25 الأحد , ربيع الثاني, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: Mathematics education, Cultural fusion, Data envelopment analysis(DEA), Mathematical Society, Parental involvement,

ملخص المقالة :

در این مقاله روند دو راهکار پیشنهاد شدة مشارکت دادن خانواده ها در آموزش ریاضی و تشکیل انجمن ریاضی برای والدین با هدف درگیر کردن والدین در آموزش ریاضی فرزندانشان،که در یکی از مدارس تهران اجرا شده بود، تشریح و نتایج عملکرد دانش آموزان قبل و بعد از انجام آن‌ها با استفاده از تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها تحلیل(DEA) شده است.تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها (DEA) یک روش برنامه‌ریزی خطی است که هدف اصلی آن، مقایسه و ارزیابی کارایی تعدادی از واحدهای تصمیم گیرنده مشابه ، مقایسه و تحلیل آن‌هاست که مقدار ورودی‌های مصرفی و خروجی‌های تولیدی متفاوتی دارند.در این تحقیق، ورودی‌ها جنبه‌های گوناگونی از شرایط فرهنگی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی (مانند میزان درآمد خانواده، وضعیت سلامت جسمی و روحی اعضای خانواده، شغل پدر و مادر و ..) خانواده‌های ۱۰۰ دانش‌آموز پسر پایه ششم دبستان‌ طلایه‌داران در منطقه ۴ تهران و خروجی‌ها میزان موفقیت در آزمون ریاضی، علاقه دانش‌آموزان مدارس مذکور به فعالیت‌های مربوط به درس ریاضی و انضباط اخلاقی است که پس از بررسی ‌ها، واحدهای کارا و ناکارا شناسایی و نتایج به طور کامل تفسیر شدند.

المصادر:

[1] Andersen, P., Petersen. N. C., (1993). A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261-1264.

 

[2] Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/ Pangarau. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.

 

[3] Banker D., Janakiramang S., & Natarajan R., (2003). Analysis of Trends in Technical and Allocative Efficiency: an Application to Texas. Public School Districts. European Journal of Operational research, Article in press

 

[4] Bastiani, J. (2004). Ocean mathematics project: A follow-up review. Available: http://www.ocean-maths.org. uk/ reports.html

 

[5] Bernie, J. & Lall, M. (2008). Building bridges between home and school mathematics: A review of the ocean mathematics project. Available: http:// www.ocean maths.org. uk/ reports. html

 

[6] Biddulph, F., Biddulph, J., & Biddulph, C. (2003). The complexity of community and family influences on children’s achievement in New Zealand: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.

 

[7] Bobis, J. & Anderson, J. (2006). Reform-oriented teaching practices and the influence of school context. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Canberra, pp. 92-98). Adelaide, SA: MERGA Inc.

 

[8] Bristow, D. (1993). IMPACT in the urban authority. In In R. Merttens & J. Vass (Eds.), Partnerships in maths: Parents and schools the IMPACT project. London, UK: The Falmer Press.

 

[9] Cai, J. (2003). Investigating parental roles in students' learning of mathematics from a cross-national perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 87-106.

 

[10] Cavanagh, M. (2006). Mathematics teachers and working mathematically: Responses to curriculum change. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces(Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group ofAustralasia, Canberra, pp. 115-122). Adelaide, SA: MERGA Inc.

 

[11] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E., (1987). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational research, 2(6), 429-444.

 

[12] Cheeseman, J. (2007). MathBusters (apologies to MythBusters). In K. Milton, H. Reeves & T. Spencer (Eds.), Mathematics essential for learning: Essential for life. (Proceedings of the 2007 AAMT conference) pp. 300-306. Australian Association on Mathematics Teachers, Hobart

 

[13] Civil, M. (2006). Working towards equity in mathematics education: A focus on learners, teachers, and parents. S. Alatorre, J.L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, 30-50). Mérida, Mexico: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.

[14] Civil, M. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Parents as learners of mathematics. Paper presented at the NCTM research pre-session, April 2001, Orlando, FL.

 

[15] Civil, M. (1999). Parents as resources for mathematical instruction. In M. van Groenestijn & D. Coben (Eds.), Mathematics as part of lifelong learning (Proceedings of the fifth international conference of 'Adults Learning Maths - A research forum', Utrecht, Netherlands, July 1998) (pp.216-222). London, UK: Goldsmiths College.

 

[16] Civil, M. (1998). Parents as resources for mathematical instruction. Adults learning maths - a research forum, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

 

[17] Civil, M., Quintos, B., & Bernier, E. (2003, April). Parents as Observers in the Mathematics Classroom: Establishing a Dialogue Between School and Community. Paper presented at the NCTM research pre-session, San Antonio, TX.

 

[18] Clarke, D. (2006). Fractions as division: The forgotten notion? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 11(3), 4-10.

 

[19] Clarke, D.M., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2008). Ten practical, research-based tips for making fractions come alive (and make sense) in the middle years. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(7), 373-380).

 

[20] Desforges, C. & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. Nottingham, UK: Queen‟s Printer.

 

[21] Edward, A. & Warin, J. (1999). Parental involvement in raising the achievement of primary school pupils: Why bother? Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 325-341.

 

[22] Farrell, M. j., (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 253-290.

 

[23] Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148-171.

 

[24] Goos, M., & Jolly, L. (2004). Building partnerships with families and communities to support children's numeracy learning. In I. Putt, R. Faragher & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millenium: Towards 2010 (Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Townsville, pp. 279-286). Sydney: MERGA.

 

[25] Groves, S., Mousley, J., & Forgasz, H. (2006). Primary Numeracy: A mapping, review and analysis of Australian research in numeracy learning at the primary school level. Canberra, ACT.

 

[26] Haghi, E., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Behzadi, M. H.  and Shahvarani, A.Performance Evaluation of Schools Math Education from a Cultural, Social and Economic Point of View by DEA Modeling, to appear in Measurement and Control.

 

[27] Haylock, D. (2007). Mathematics explained for primary teachers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

 

[28] Marshall, L. & Swan, P. (2010). Parents as participating partners. APMC, 15(3), 25-32.

 

[29] McNamara, O., Hustler, D., Stronach, I., Rodrigo, M., Beresford, E., & Botcherby, S. (2000). Room to manoeuvre: Mobilising the „active partner‟ in home-school relations. British Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-489.

 

[30] Merttens, R. & Vass, J. (Eds.) (1993). Partnerships in maths: Parents and schools rhe IMPACT project. London, UK: The Falmer Press.

 

[31] Ministry of Education. (2008). Home-school partnership: Numeracy. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media Limited.

 

[32] Morgan, A. & Tremere, P. (1993). IMPACT: A Humberside perspective. In In R. Merttens & J. Vass (Eds.), Partnerships in maths: Parents and schools the IMPACT project. London, UK: The Falmer Press.

 

[33] Morony, W. (2004). Numeracy: Families working it out together. APMC, 9(4), 21-23.

 

[34] Muir, T. (2009). At home with numeracy: Empowering parents to be active participants in their child‟ snumeracy development. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides (Proceedingsof the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 395-402). Wellington, NZ: MERGA.

 

[35] Muir, T. (2011). Join the club: Engaging parents in mathematics education. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley,T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (Proceedings of the 2011 AAMT-MERGA Conference, pp. 531-539). Alice Springs, NT: MERGA National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

 

[36] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards. Retrieved December 8, 2005, from http://my.nctm.org/ standards/previous/CurrEvStds/index.htm

 

[37] Olsen, J., & Barrett, J. (2004). Coaching teachers to implement mathematics reform. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 6, 73-91.

 

[38] Onslow, B. (1992). Improving the attitude of students and parents through family involvement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(3), 24-31.

 

[39] Peressini, D. D. (1998). The portrayal of parents in the school mathematics reform literature: Locating the context for parental involvement. Journal for research in mathematics education, 29(5), 555-583.

 

[40] Pritchard, R. (2004). Investigating parental attitudes and beliefs in mathematics education. In I. Putt, R. Faragher & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millenium: Towards 2010 (Proceedingsof the 27th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Townsville, pp. 478-485). Sydney: MERGA.

 

[41] Quintos, B., Bratton, J., & Civil, M. (2005, February). Engaging with Parents on a Critical Dialogue About Mathematics Education. Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, February 17-21, 2005, Sant

Feliu de Guíxols, Spain

 

[42] Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships andmathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 196-206.

 

[43] Tierney, R. J. & Readence, J. E. (2005). Reading Strategies and Practices (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Allyn &Bacon.

 

[44] Tye, C. (1993). IMPACT and the early years classroom. In R. Merttens & J. Vass (Eds.), Partnerships in maths: Parents and schools the IMPACT project. London, UK: The Falmer Press.

 

[45] Van de Walle, J. (1999). Reform mathematics vs. the basics: Understanding the conflict and dealing with it.Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://mathematicallysane.com/analysis/reformvbasics.asp

 

[46] Van de Walle, J. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson EducationInc.