High-Velocity Impact Behavior of 3D Fiber Metal Laminates Incorporating Nano-Reinforced Syntactic Foam
الموضوعات :reza hajizadehasl 1 , Mehdi Yarmohammad Tooski 2 , mohsen jabbari 3 , Laleh Maleknia 4
1 - mech.eng.dept.south tehran branch,islamic azad university, tehran,iran
2 - South Tehran branch, Islamic azad University
3 - South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Biomedical Enginiring, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Fiber Metal Laminates (FMLs), High-Velocity Impact, Nanoclay Reinforcement, Syntactic Foam Core, Ballistic Performance,
ملخص المقالة :
This research conducts an experimental assessment of the high-velocity impact response of three-dimensional fiber metal laminates (3D FMLs) integrated with a nano-reinforced syntactic foam core. Laminates with different nanoclay loadings (0, 3, 5, and 7 wt.%) were fabricated in both reinforced and unreinforced forms and subjected to ballistic testing. Impact experiments were carried out using a light gas gun system that launched 9 mm steel projectiles at a velocity of 235 m/s, enabling determination of the ballistic limit velocities. The dynamic behavior and failure mechanisms of the laminates were examined through field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) to quantify the role of nanoparticle reinforcement on their impact resistance. The findings revealed that the addition of 5 wt.% nanoclay yielded an 18.84% reduction in residual projectile velocity and a 14.97% improvement in absorbed impact energy compared with unreinforced 3D FMLs. Morphological and macroscopic inspections demonstrated that nanoclay enhanced fiber–matrix interfacial adhesion, suppressed matrix microcracking, and mitigated interlaminar delamination. These effects were attributed to the reinforcing action of nanoclay within the polymeric phase. Conversely, nanoclay incorporation was observed to reduce adhesion at the aluminum–composite interface, which promoted more severe plastic deformation of the aluminum sheets during impact. Additionally, microstructural analysis confirmed that nanoclay particles facilitated fiber fibrillation, thereby enhancing the energy dissipation capacity of the laminate under high-velocity impact conditions.
1. Serubibi A, Hazell PJ, Escobedo JP, Wang H, Oromiehie E, Prusty GB, et al. Fibre-metal laminate structures: High-velocity impact, penetration, and blast loading – A review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2023 Oct 1;173:107674.
2. Heimbs S, Wagner T, Viana Lozoya JT, Hoenisch B FF. Comparison of impact behaviour of glass, carbon and Dyneema composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2019;233(3):951–66.
3. Yang C, Chen Z, Yao S, Xu P, Li S, Alqahtani MS. Parametric study on the crushing performance of a polyurethane foam-filled CFRP/Al composite sandwich structure. Polym Test. 2022 Apr 1;108:107515.
4. Kamaloo A, Jabbari M, Tooski MY, Javadi M. Nonlinear Free Vibrations Analysis of Delaminated Composite Conical Shells. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. 2019;
5. Zhu X, Chen W, Liu L, Xu K, Luo G, Zhao Z. Experimental investigation on high-velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of 2D and 3D textile composites. Compos Struct. 2023 Jan 1;303:116256.
6. Praveen R, Koteswara Rao S, Damodaram R SKS. Numerical and experimental investigations on the effect of target thickness and solution treatment on the ballistic behaviour of AA7075 thick plates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2022;236(7):3530–45.
7. Önder A, Robinson M. Investigating the feasibility of a new testing method for GFRP/polymer foam sandwich composites used in railway passenger vehicles. Compos Struct. 2020 Feb 1;233:111576.
8. Alavi Nia A, Mokari S, Zakizadeh M, Kazemi M. Experimental and numerical investigations of the effect of cellular wired core on the ballistic resistance of sandwich structures. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2017 Nov 1;70:445–52.
9. Sahoo CK, Bhatia GS, Balaganesan G, Arockiarajan A. Post repair high velocity impact behaviour of carbon-glass hybrid composite: Experimental and numerical study. Int J Impact Eng. 2022 Oct 1;168:104305.
10. Serubibi A, Hazell PJ, Escobedo JP, Wang H, Oromiehie E, Prusty GB, et al. Fibre-metal laminate structures: High-velocity impact, penetration, and blast loading – A review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf [Internet]. 2023;173(March):107674. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107674
11. Morinière FD, Alderliesten RC, Sadighi M, Benedictus R. An integrated study on the low-velocity impact response of the GLARE fibre-metal laminate. Compos Struct. 2013;100:89–103.
12. Asaee Z, Shadlou S, Taheri F. Low-velocity impact response of fiberglass/magnesium FMLs with a new 3D fiberglass fabric. Compos Struct [Internet]. 2015;122:155–65. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.038
13. Khoramishad H, Alikhani H, Dariushi S. An experimental study on the effect of adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes on high-velocity impact behavior of fiber metal laminates. Compos Struct. 2018 Oct 1;201:561–9.
14. Wang A, Xia D, Xian G, Li H. Effect of nanoclay grafting onto flax fibers on the interfacial shear strength and mechanical properties of flax/epoxy composites. Polym Compos. 2019;40(9):3482–92.
15. Cheng X, Liu L, Feng X, Shen L, Wu Z. Low Temperature-Based Flexural Properties of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composite Laminates Incorporated with Carbon Nanotube Sheets. Macromol Mater Eng. 2019;304(10):1–10.
38 Journal of Mechanical Research and Application (JMRA), Vol. 14 No.4, 1403(2025),28-39
`
16. Amirbeygi H, Khosravi H, Tohidlou E. Reinforcing effects of aminosilane-functionalized graphene on the tribological and mechanical behaviors of epoxy nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136(18):1–8.
17. Khurram AA, Hussain R, Afzal H, Akram A, Subhanni T. Carbon nanotubes for enhanced interface of fiber metal laminate. Int J Adhes Adhes [Internet]. 2018;86:29–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.08.008
18. Shahjouei S, Barati MR, Tooski MY. High Velocity Impact Response and Damage Mechanism of an Aluminium/Glass-Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composite Plate Reinforced with Graphene Nano-plates. Fibers Polym. 2021;22(2):480–8.
19. Haro EE, Odeshi AG, Szpunar JA. The energy absorption behavior of hybrid composite laminates containing nano-fillers under ballistic impact. Int J Impact Eng [Internet]. 2016;96:11–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.012
20. Bahari-Sambran F, Eslami-Farsani R, Arbab Chirani S. The flexural and impact behavior of the laminated aluminum-epoxy/basalt fibers composites containing nanoclay: An experimental investigation. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2020;22(6):1931–51.
21. Fan J, Cantwell WJ, Guan ZW. The low-velocity impact response of fiber-metal laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2011;30(1):26–35.
22. Abdullah MR, Cantwell WJ. The impact resistance of polypropylene-based fibre-metal laminates. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66(11–12):1682–93.
23. Magarajan U SKS. Effect of ceramic particles reinforcement on the ballistic resistance of friction stir processed thick AA6061 surface composite targets. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng. 2021;235(15):2782–94.
24. Heimbs S, Wagner T, Viana Lozoya JT, Hoenisch B, Franke F. Comparison of impact behaviour of glass, carbon and Dyneema composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2019;233(3):951–66.
25. Koricho EG, Khomenko A, Haq M, Drzal LT, Belingardi G, Martorana B. Effect of hybrid (micro- and nano-) fillers on impact response of GFRP composite. Compos Struct [Internet]. 2015;134:789–98. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.106
26. Ávila AF, Carvalho MGR, Dias EC, da Cruz DTL. Nano-structured sandwich composites response to low-velocity impact. Compos Struct [Internet]. 2010;92(3):745–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.010
27. Ahmadi H, Liaghat G, Charandabi SC. High velocity impact on composite sandwich panels with nano-reinforced syntactic foam core. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020 Mar 1;148.
28. Uddin MF, Mahfuz H, Zainuddin S, Jeelani S. Improving Ballistic Performance of Polyurethane Foam by Nanoparticle Reinforcement. J Nanotechnol. 2009;2009:1–8.
29. Zhang H, Gn SW, An J, Xiang Y, Yang JL. Impact Behaviour of GLAREs with MWCNT Modified Epoxy Resins. Exp Mech. 2014;54(1):83–93.
30. Taherzadeh-Fard A, Khodadadi A, Liaghat G, Yao XF, Mehrizi MAZ. Mechanical properties and energy absorption capacity of chopped fiber reinforced natural rubber. Compos Part C Open Access. 2022 Mar 1;7:100237.
31. Mahmood H, Tripathi M, Pugno N, Pegoretti A. Enhancement of interfacial adhesion in glass fiber/epoxy composites by electrophoretic deposition of graphene oxide on glass fibers. Compos Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 1;126:149–57.
32. Kawashima S, Wang K, Ferron RD, Kim JH, Tregger N, Shah S. A review of the effect of nanoclays on the fresh and
39 Journal of Mechanical Research and Application (JMRA), Vol. 14 No.4, 1403(2025),28-39
hardened properties of cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 2021 Sep 1;147:106502.
33. M S, TK K, S BL, R R, S Raj S. Behavior of epoxy reinforced banana glass fiber hybrid composite with nanoclay interference. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci [Internet]. 2021 Aug 2;236(6):2995–3003. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062211035796
34. Gupta N, Priya S, Islam R, Ricci W. Characterization of mechanical and electrical properties of epoxy-glass microballoon syntactic composites. Ferroelectrics. 2006;345(1):1–12.
35. Gupta N, Ye R, Porfiri M. Comparison of tensile and compressive characteristics of vinyl ester/glass microballoon syntactic foams. Compos Part B Eng. 2010;41(3):236–45.
36. Ahmadi H, Liaghat G, Charandabi SC. High velocity impact on composite sandwich panels with nano-reinforced syntactic foam core. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;148:106599.
37. Ebrahimnezhad-Khaljiri H, Eslami-Farsani R, Talebi S. Investigating the High Velocity Impact Behavior of the Laminated Composites of Aluminum/Jute Fibers- Epoxy Containing Nanoclay Particles. Fibers Polym. 2020;21(11):2607–13.
38. Nasirzadeh R, Sabet AR. Study of foam density variations in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2014 Jan 1;63:129–39.
