تدوین و اعتباریابی بسته توانمندسازی عادات ذهنی مبتنی بر مدل کاستا و کالیک و اثربخشی آن بر تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه هشتم
الموضوعات : Psychological Models and Methods
عمادالدین احراری
1
,
رامین حبیبی کلیبر
2
,
جواد مصرآبادی
3
,
ابوالفضل فرید
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران
2 - استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران.
3 - استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران
4 - دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: اعتباریابی, بسته توانمندسازی, عادات ذهنی, کاستا و کالیک.,
ملخص المقالة :
مقدمه: بهسبب نقش برجسته عادات ذهنی در ارتقاء مهارت‌های فکری و توانمندسازی افراد برای مواجهه با مسائل پیچیده، این پژوهش باهدف تدوین و اعتباریابی بسته توانمندسازی عادات ذهنی کاستا و کالیک و سنجش اثربخشی آن بر تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه هشتم انجام شد.
روش: پژوهش آمیخته حاضر، در بخش کیفی با روش سنتز چارچوب انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری آن شامل تمامی منابع چاپ‌شده مرتبط از سال 2000 تا 21 سپتامبر 2024 (31/06/1403) بود. براساس نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و ملاک‌های ورود و خروج، 33 منبع تحلیل شد. روایی محتوایی بسته با شاخص‌های CVR و CVI و نظر 15 متخصص بررسی شد. بخش کمی، نیمه‌آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل و پیگیری دوماهه بود. جامعه آماری شامل دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه هشتم شهر خواف در سال تحصیلی 1403-1404 بود. پس از انتخاب مدرسه بهصورت در دسترس، 40 دانشآموز با نمونه‌گیری تصادفی در دو گروه 20 نفری آزمایش و کنترل گمارده شدند. داده‌ها با آزمون تفکر انتقادی ربانیپارسا و همکاران (1397) جمعآوری و با تحلیل واریانس اندازه‌گیری مکرر تحلیل شدند.
یافتهها: مقادیر CVR بین 60/0 تا 1 و مقادیر CVI بین 93/0 تا 1 بود. پس از اعمال بازبینی‌ها، بسته نهایی در 16 جلسه 90 دقیقه‌ای تدوین شد. همچنین اجرای بسته در مراحل پس‌آزمون و پیگیری، تأثیر معناداری بر بهبود تفکر انتقادی گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه کنترل داشته است (p<0.05).
نتیجهگیری: بسته حاضر می‌تواند در تدوین محتوای کتاب تفکر و سبک زندگی و نیز فعالیت‌های فوق‌برنامه پایه هشتم به‌کار رود تا ضمن تقویت عادات ذهنی، تفکر انتقادی دانش‌آموزان ارتقاء یابد.
1. Dilmaç S, Dilmaç O. The effects of design-based art activities on students’ spatial thinking skills. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2025 Feb 1;14(1):260–8.
2. O’Reilly C, Devitt A, Hayes N. Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - A systematic literature review. Think Ski Creat. 2022 Dec;46:101110.
3. Pitorini DE, Suciati, Harlita. Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using an E-Module Based on Problem-Based Learning Combined with Socratic Dialogue. J Educ Online. 2024;22(1):52–65.
4. Alkhatib OJ. An Effective Assessment Method of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Decision-Making) in Engineering and Humanities. 2022 Adv Sci Eng Technol Int Conf ASET 2022. 2022;1–6.
5. Renatovna AS, Renatovna AG. Pedagogical and psychological conditions of preparing students for social relations on the basis of the development of critical thinking. Psychol Educ J. 2021;58(2):4889–902.
6. Nazarboland N, Khataeilar F, Alizadeh E. The effectiveness of critical thinking training on working memory, cognitive flexibility and cognitive emotion regulation in students. Q Appl Psychol. 2024;18(4):9–31. [In Persian].
7. Thoib I. Development of Integration-Interconnection Oriented Problem Based Learning Model to Improve Critical Thinking Ability. J Tianjin Univ Sci Technol [Internet]. 2021;54(6):70–86.
8. Lantian A, Bagneux V, Delouvée S, Gauvrit N. Maybe a free thinker but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021;35(3):674–84.
9. Al-Ghoweri DJA, Al-Zboun DMS. The Extent of the Impact of Blended Learning on Developing Habits of Mind from the Standpoint of Students of Learning and Scientific Research Skills Course at the University of Jordan. Int J High Educ. 2021 Mar 8;10(4):196–206.
10. Tashtoush MA, Wardat Y, Aloufi F, Taani O. The effect of a training program based on TIMSS to developing the levels of habits of mind and mathematical reasoning skills among pre-service mathematics teachers. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2022 Oct 19;18(11):em2182.
11. Costa AL, Kallick B. Preface. In: Costa AL, Kallick B, editors. Habits of mind across the curriculum: Practical and creative strategies for teachers. ASCD; 2009. p. 9–14.
12. Yustinah N, Rohaeti EE, Yuliani A. The Effect of Habits of Mind on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Junior High School Students. J Innov Math Learn. 2023 Jan 10;6(1):12–9.
13. Vazquez JC. The impact of Habits of Mind: An exploratory study. Doctoral Thesis. Western Connecticut State University, The United States of America; 2020.
14. Sari RP, Hasibuan MP, Haji AG, Nahadi, Sofiyan. A Development of project-based learning (PBL) chemistry worksheet to form students’ habits of mind. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1460(1):012096.
15. Leest B, Wolbers MHJ. Critical thinking, creativity and study results as predictors of selection for and successful completion of excellence programmes in Dutch higher education institutions. Eur J High Educ [Internet]. 2021;11(1):29–43.
16. Haka NB, Nisa K, Masya H. Improving the habits of mind of senior high school students toward biology learning through creative problem-solving learning model based on mind mapping: Pre-experimental study. Assim Indones J Biol Educ. 2022;5(1):39–50.
17. Hidayati N, Idris T. Students’ habits of mind profiles of biology education department at public and private universities in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. Int J Instr. 2020;13(2):407–18.
18. Ang HK, Poh SH. Impact of habits of mind on student achievement. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.; 2006.
19. Salih HA. The Effectiveness of a Training Program Based on Habits of Mind in Developing Critical Thinking Skills for Preparatory School Teachers. J Al-Farahidi’s Arts. 2022;14(50):485–99.
20. Alghtani OA, Alyosif YA. The Effectiveness of Suggested Enhancement Program in The Light of Habits of Mind In DevelopingCreative Abilities among Preparatory Year Students at The University of Tabuk. Int J Talent Dev. 2015;6(2):203–29.
21. Royce WN, Heiselberg PA, Buckenmaier CS, Chenail RJ. An Evaluation of the Habits of Mind Character Education Program(Doctoral dissertation). 2015.
22. Sisk LM, Gee DG. Stress and adolescence: Vulnerability and opportunity during a sensitive window of development. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;44:286–92.
23. Poorhousein-Lazarjani Z, Navidi-Moghadam M. The Relationship between Resilience and Self-compassion with Social Adjustment of Female High School Students in Kalachai City. Salāmat-i ijtimā̒ī(Community Heal. 2022;9(1):73–81. [In Persian].
24. Shafiee I, Bahrami H, Hatami H. Effectiveness of Positive Thinking training on Cognitive emotion regulation and Academic procrastination in Secondary school girl students. J Res Educ Syst. 2019;13(47):23–40. [In Persian].
25. Forster M, Gower AL, Gloppen K, Sieving R, Oliphant J, Plowman S, et al. Associations Between Dimensions of School Engagement and Bullying Victimization and Perpetration Among Middle School Students. School Ment Health. 2020 Jun 8;12(2):296–307.
26. Parida SP, Gajjala A, Giri PP. Empowering adolescent girls, is sexual and reproductive health education a solution? J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021 Jan;10(1):66–71.
27. Zianejad shirazi A, Kouroshnia M, Sohrabi N, Bagholi H. Development of differential equation of individual factors affecting performance in the fourth grade TIMSS 2019 exam in high and low performance students. J Res Educ Syst. 2022;16(58):129–41. [In Persian].
28. Brunton G, Oliver S, Thomas J. Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method. Res Synth Methods. 2020;11(3):316–30.
29. Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Second. An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017. 352 p.
30. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls, McNaughton C, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013. 456 p.
31. Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev. 2012;1(28):1–9.
32. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014. 230 p.
33. LAWSHE CH. A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–75.
34. Gwet KL. Handbook of Inter Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2014. 410 p.
35. Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis. F A Davis Co; 1981. 362 p.
36. Rabbani parsa E, Mesrabadi J, Yarmohammadzade P. Build and Standardization of Critical Thinking. Q Educ Meas. 2019;9(34):91–114. [In Persian].
37. Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet KL. A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Dec 29;13(61):1–7.
38. Campbell J. Theorising habits of mind as a framework for learning. Comput Math Sci. 2006;6(1):102–9.
39. Altan S, Lane JF, Dottin E. Using Habits of Mind, Intelligent Behaviors, and Educational Theories to Create a Conceptual Framework for Developing Effective Teaching Dispositions. J Teach Educ. 2019;70(2):169–83.
40. ÜNVEREN BİLGİÇ EN, ARGÜN Z. Examining Prospective Primary School Mathematics Teachers’ Algebraic Habits of Mind in the Context of Problem Solving. Int e-Journal Educ Stud [Internet]. 2018 Sep 13;2(4):64–80.
41. Elbarbari D, Abo-Aita I, Elmeanawy R. The Level of Practicing Habits of Mind in Social Studies among Preparatory Stage Students in the Arabic Republic of Egypt. Port Said J Educ Res. 2022 Sep 1;1(1):36–59.
42. Yousefizadeh S. Evaluation of Curriculum Programs Based on Constructivist Learning Theory and the Development of Critical Thinking. J Study Innov Educ Dev [Internet]. 2023;3(1):36–45. [In Persian].
43. Kwan YW, Wong AFL. Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. Int J Educ Res [Internet]. 2015;70:68–79.
44. Abdelhamid A, Aicha S, Ahlam B, Zahia. B. The Level Of Habits Of Mind Of Preschoolers From The Perspective Of Preschool Teachers. Elem Educ Online. 2024;23(4):249–61.
45. Zergui A, Boukef Z, Abismail A. The Relevance of Incorporating Habits of Mind in to Preschool Curriculum: Promoting Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Early Childhood Education. Tribut J Stud Sci Res Soc Hum Sci. 2024;8(1):522–32.
46. Yaprak Z, Kaya F. Improving EFL Learners’ Oral Production through Reasoning-gap Tasks Enhanced with Critical Thinking Standards: Developing and Implementing a Critical TBLT Model, Pre-Task Plan, and Speaking Rubric. Adv Lang Lit Stud [Internet]. 2020 Feb 28;11(1):40–50.
47. Ariyati E, Susilo H, Suwono H, Rohman F. Promoting Student’s Habits of Mind and Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Science Education. J Biol Educ Indones (Jurnal Pendidik Biol Indones. 2024 Nov 26;10(1):85–95.
