Effects of Applying “Talk about Picture” Instruction Strategies on Pre-intermediate and Upper-intermediate EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension
الموضوعات :Mustafa Fakher 1 , Nesa Nabifar 2 , Davud Kuhi 3
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of ELT, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, English Language Department, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Pre-intermediate learners, upper-intermediate learners, reading comprehension, talk about picture instruction,
ملخص المقالة :
The present study was an endeavor to explore the impact of using “talk about picture” instruction strategy on pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance of a language institute in Urmia, Iran. Also, students’ views on the use of this strategy in EFL classes and their effect on their reading comprehension were assessed. To this end, 60 students (males and female) studying at pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate level in wo language institutes in Urmia, north-west of Iran were chosen through convenience sampling. The students were classified into two groups of experimental and control groups. The teaching technique of the experimental group was managed by “talk about picture” to establish a set of five-session treatments, the posttest on the reading comprehension test (PET for pre-intermediate and OPT for upper-intermediate) were conducted. The results revealed that the employment “talk about picture” strategy significantly affected the EFL learners’ reading comprehension also they could have pedagogical implications for language teachers, learners, and syllabus designers.
Adnan, N. H., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2018). Software engineering design principles applied to instructional design: What can we learn from our sister discipline? TechTrends, 62(1), 77-94.
Anderson, N. J. Integration with Other Language Skills. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-7).
Ascher, A., & Saslow, J. (2011). Top notch series. In: Longman: Pearson Education.
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing: Routledge.
Bright, J., & McGregor, G. (1970). 1970: Teaching English as a second language. London: Longman.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching principles: P. Ed Australia.
Dhillon, B. P. S., Herman, H., & Syafryadin, S. (2020). The Effect of Skimming Method to Improve Students’ Ability in Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text. Linguists: Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(1), 77-88.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
Gyselinck, V., & Tardieu, H. (1999). The role of illustrations in text comprehension: what, when, for whom, and why?
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching: Pearson longman.
Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL quarterly, 40(1), 109-131.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness: Harvard University Press.
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340-357.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications: Addison-Wesley Longman Limited.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from the PEW Research website: http://www. pewinternet. org/Reports/2005/Teens-and-Technology. aspx.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition.
Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context: Routledge.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (2006). Dual coding theory and education. Paper presented at the Draft chapter presented at the conference on Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children at The University of Michigan School of Education.
Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Studying visual displays: How to instructionally support learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 599-621.
Richards, J. C., Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice: Cambridge university press.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5, 1329-1362.
Serafini, F. (2010). Reading multimodal texts: Perceptual, structural and ideological perspectives. Children's Literature in Education, 41(2), 85-104.
Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 455-475.
Suraprajit, P. (2019). Bottom-up vs top-down model: The perception of reading strategies among Thai university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 454-460.
Thornbury, S. (2006). How to teach vocabulary: Pearson Education India.
Yi-Chun, P., & Yi-Ching, P. (2009). The effects of pictures on the reading comprehension of low-proficiency Taiwanese English foreign language college students: An action research study. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 25(3).
