مدل سازی نقش رهبری‌آموزشی مدیران از طریق فرهنگ مدرسه در اشتیاق شغلی معلمان

الموضوعات :

عادل زاهد بابلان ¹ (استاد/ دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی)
مهدی معینی کیا ² (استاد / دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی)
علی رضایی شریف ³ (استاد / دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی)
قدرت اله کولایی ⁴ (دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی - دانشجوی دکتری)

تاريخ الإرسال : 18 السبت , ربيع الأول, 1438 تاريخ التأكيد : 25 الأحد , ربيع الثاني, 1441 تاريخ الإصدار : 25 الجمعة , ربيع الأول, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: رهبری آموزشی مدیران, فرهنگ مدرسه, اشتیاق شغلی معلمان,

ملخص المقالة :

     هدف از این پژوهش مدل­سازی نقش رهبری آموزشی مدیران از طریق فرهنگ مدرسه در اشتیاق شغلی معلمان بود. روش پژوهش همبستگی از نوع مدل معادلات ساختاری بوده و بدین منظور سه ابزار پژوهش تحت عنوان مقیاس رهبری آموزشی هالینگر و وانگ (2015) با ضریب آلفای 97/0، پرسشنامه فرهنگ مدرسه گرونرت (1998) با ضریب آلفای 98/0 و پرسشنامه اشتیاق شغلی شافلی و بیکر (2003) با ضریب آلفای 89/0 جهت گردآوری داده­ها استفاده شد. جامعه آماری این مطالعه را 1568 نفر از معلمان ابتدایی تشکیل می­داد. حجم نمونه برای 1600 نفر با استفاده از جدول مورگان با آلفای 0.05 تعداد310 نفر تعیین شد. برای تحلیل داده­ها از روش مدل معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم افزار لیزرل استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که مدل علی مفروض از برازش مناسبی برخودار بوده است و مدل تدوین شده قابلیت تعمیم به جامعه پژوهش را دارد. همچنین رهبری آموزشی به واسطه فرهنگ مدرسه با اشتیاق شغلی معلمان ارتباط غیر مستقیم مثبت و معنادار دارد که تاکیدی بر لزوم تمرکز بر تغییر فرهنگ قبل از هرگونه بهسازی مدارس می­باشد.  با این حال تاثیر مستقیم رهبری آموزشی بر اشتیاق شغلی معنادار نبود.

المصادر:

 

• Akharbin P, Zahed Babelan A, Naghizadeh-Baghi A (2013). The Relationship between Servant Leadership & Organizational Learning and Nurses’ Work Engagement. Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery, 111(1), 91-98.


• Albrecht, S. L. (2011). Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice. Human Resource Management International Digest, 19(7).


• Anderman, E. M. (1991). Teacher Commitment and Job Satisfaction: The Role of School Culture and Principal Leadership. ERIC


• Arlestig, Helene (2008). Communication between Principals and Teachers in Successful Schools. Academic dissertation, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Sweden.


• Carasco-Saul, M., Kim, W., & Kim, T. (2014). Leadership and employee engagement proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Human Resource Development Review, 1534484314560406.


• Ghanbari, S. & Escandari, A. (2014). A Study of the Relationship between Leadership Styles and Learning Organization in Elementary Schools. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 4 (20), 65-94.


• Gholtash, A. (2014). Relationship of Organizational Culture and Organizational Intelligence to Job Satisfaction. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 3 (19), 115-128.


• Gordon, G. (2013). School leadership linked to engagement and student achievement. Washington, DC: Gallup.


• Gruenert, S.  & Whitaker, T. (2015). School culture rewired: How to define, assess, and transform it. ASCD.


• Gruenert, S. W. (1998). Development of a schoolculture survey (Unpublished digital dissertation). University of Missouri-Columbia Missouri. Retrieved from www. MLLC.org


• Gruenert, Steve (2005). Correlations of Collaborative School Cultures with Student Achievement. NASSP Bulletin; vol. 89, 645: pp. 43-55.


• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of education, 33(3), 329-352.


• Hallinger, P. (2008, April). Methodologies for studying school leadership: A review of 25 years of research using the principal instructional management rating scale. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.


• Hallinger, P. (2010). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 0013161X10383412.


• Hallinger, P. (2011a). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2) 271–306.


• Hallinger, P., & Huber, S. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: international perspectives, 359-367.


• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American journal of education, 94(3), 328-355.


• Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Springer.


• Hallinger, P., Taraseina, P.  & Miller, J. (1994). Assessing the instructional leadership of secondary school principals in Thailand. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(4), 321–348


• Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (2005). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice.


• Huber, S. G. (Ed.). (2009). School leadership-international perspectives (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media.


• Klassen, R. M., Yerdelen, S., & Durksen, T. L. (2013). Measuring teacher engagement: development of the engaged teachers scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 33-52.


• Le Clear, E. A. (2005). Relationships among leadership styles, school culture, and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).


• Louis, K. S. & Smith, B. (1991). Restructuring, Teacher Engagement and School Culture: Perspectives on School Reform and the Improvement of Teacher's Work 1. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(1), 34-52.


• Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.


• MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73-84.


• Maleky Farahani, B. & Jafari, P. (2013). The Role of Spiritual Leadership and Psychological Capital on Teachers’ Work Engagementin Public Girls Secondary and High Schools in Tehran. Modern Thoughts in Education, 10(1), 121-137.


• Mees, G. W. (2008). The relationship among principal leadership, school culture, and student achievement in Missouri middle schools (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3371083).


• Naidoo, P. & Martins, N. (2014). Investigating the relationship between organisational culture and work engagement. (Special Issue: South Africa-2), 12(4), 432-440.


• Nie, D. (2016). Culture matters: the leader-follower relationship in the Chinese organizational context. University of Jyväskylä


• Pavlova, E. (2013). Predicting employee engagement and job satisfaction among cabin crew.


• Peterson, K. D., & Deal, T. E. (1998). How leaders influence the culture of schools. Educational leadership, 56, 28-31.


• Peterson, Kenet D. & Deal, Terrence E. (2009). The shaping school culture fieldbook. The Jossey-Bass Education Series.


• PoorAbbas, A. (2008). Effectiveness of participation in professional efficacy workshops upon occupational engagement among employees at University of Isfahan. M.A. thesis, career counseling university of Isfaan. . (In Persian)


• Qasemi, Vahid (2013). Structural Equation Modeling in Social Research Using Amos Graphics. Tehran: Jamehshenasan Publication.


• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 60-61.


• Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht.


• Schein, E. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons.


• Segers, J., De Prins, P., & Brouwers, S. (2010). 12 Leadership and engagement: a brief review of the literature, a proposed model, and practical implications. Management, 34, 143-69.


• Stanislavov, I., & Ivanov, S. (2014). The role of leadership for shaping organizational culture and building employee engagement in the Bulgarian gaming industry. Turizam: znanstveno-stručni časopis, 62(1), 19-40.


• Stronge, J. H. & Hindman, J. L. (2003). Hiring the best teachers. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 48-52.


• Tuckey, M. R., Bakker, A. B., & Dollard, M. F. (2012). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: a multilevel study. Journal of occupational health psychology, 17(1), 15.


• Valentine, J. (2006). A collaborative culture for school improvement: Significance, definition, and measurement. Research Summary. Middle Level Leadership Center. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.


• Waldron, N. L., & McLeskey, J. (2010). Establishing a collaborative school culture through comprehensive school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 58-74.


• Wiley, J. W. (2010). The impact of effective leadership on employee engagement. Employment Relations Today, 37(2), 47،52.


• Yasini, A., Abbasian, A. & yasini, T. (2013). The Effect of Principals’ Distributed Leadership Style on Teacher job Performance: Introducing a Model. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 4 (13), 33-50.


• Xu, J., & Cooper Thomas, H. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 399-416.


• Zeinabadi, H., Behrangi, M., Naveebrahim, A. & Farzad, V. (2011). Role of managers in the academic achievement of elementary school students in Tehran: The test of the effect of transformational leadership style. Educational Innovations Quarterly, 9(34), 89-126.