اثر میانجی یادگیری سازمانی بر رابطه بین مهندسی مجدد و عملکرد سازمانی (مورد: کارکنان دانشگاه تهران)

الموضوعات :

جواد پورکریمی ¹ (استادیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)
امین هماینی دمیرچی ² (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)
سجاد قارلقی ³ (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران)
محمدرضا کرمی ⁴ (دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد و مدیریت مالی آموزش عالی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)

تاريخ الإرسال : 17 الأحد , شوال, 1439 تاريخ التأكيد : 11 الإثنين , ربيع الأول, 1440 تاريخ الإصدار : 15 الأربعاء , جمادى الثانية, 1440

الکلمات المفتاحية: یادگیری سازمانی, کارکنان, عملکرد سازمانی, مهندسی مجدد,

ملخص المقالة :

هدف از اجرای این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر مهندسی مجدد بر عملکرد سازمانی با نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی – همبستگی با تاکید بر معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه تهران (3237 نفر) تشکیل می‌دادند. برای تعیین حجم نمونه از فرمول کوکران استفاده شد و تعداد 343 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند که گزینش آن‌ها با استفاده از روش طبقه‌ای متناسب صورت گرفت. جمع‌آوری داده‌ها براساس سه پرسشنامه مهندسی مجدد، یادگیری سازمانی و عملکرد سازمانی صورت گرفت که ضریب آلفای کرونباخ آن‌ها به ترتیب 87/0، 92/0 و 88/0 به دست آمد و روایی صوری و محتوایی آن‌ها با استفاده از نظر متخصصان تایید شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها به کمک دو نرم‌افزار SPSS و LISREL صورت پذیرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد: مهندسی مجدد بر یادگیری سازمانی و عملکرد سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معنی‌داری دارد و یادگیری سازمانی نیز بر عملکرد سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معنی داری دارد. همچنین نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی در رابطه بین مهندسی مجدد و عملکرد سازمانی تایید شد.

المصادر:

• Ahmad, S., Schroeder, R.G., (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance. Journal of Operational Management, 21, 19-43.


• Ahmadi, H. (2013). The Relationship between distributed leadership and organizational performance primary school teachers in city Tehran, Master thesis, Tehran University.[in Persian]


• Alipour, F., Idris, K., Ismail, I.A., Anak Uli, J., & Karimi, R. (2011). Learning organization and organizational performance: Mediation role of entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Sciences, 21(4).


• Andy C. L.; Yeung, K. H. L. & Rachel, W. Y. Y. (2007). Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizational performance: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), pp. 2459-2477.


• Arabi, Sayed Mohammad; dehghan, Nabiallah; aghula, Farid (2011). Customs Import Process Reengineering Iran,Magazine Review Commercia, l46: 73-63. .[in Persian]


• Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley.


• Asadi, Hassan; Ghanbarpour nosrati, Amir, ghorbani, Mohammadhossien; dousti, Morteza. (2009). The relationship between learning and organizational performance of Physical Education Organization of Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of Sport Management, (1): 247-237. .[in Persian]


• Bahreyni, Sayed Sadegh (2006). Analytical review of the implementation of re-engineering processes in higher education. Journal of Andish-e-Sadegh. (23): 106-83. .[in Persian]


• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and the Theory of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.


• Boyce, M. E. (2003). Organizational Learning is Essential to Achieving and Sustaining Change in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), pp. 119-136.


• Chich-Jen, S. (2011). Study on the relations among the customer knowledgemanagement, learning organization, and organizational performance. The Service Industries Journal, 31(5), pp. 791-807.


• Chiva, R., Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., (2007). Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Manpower 28, 224-242.


• Crossan, M.M., Kane, H.W., White, R.E., (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24, 522-537.


• Demers, D. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of learning organization characteristics and firm performance. Unpublished Ph.D., The Pennsylvania State University, United States - Pennsylvania.


• Dixon, N. (1998). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. Gower: Brookfield.


• Doyle, W. & Young, J. D. (2007). Workplace learning strategies of managers in small andlarge firms in knowledge-based industries. Proceedings of the University Forum on Human Resource Development, June 27-29, Oxford, UK.


• Eikebrokk, T. R. & Olsen, D. H. (2009). Training, competence, and business performance:Evidence from E-business in European small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of E-Business Research, 5 (1), pp. 92-116.


• Ellinger, A., et al. (2002). “The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms’ financial performance : An empirical assessment”. Human Resource Development Quarterly, (1), PP:5-21.


• Gadot, Eran Vigoda(2006). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance An empirical examination of two competing models, Personnel Review Vol. 36 No. 5, 2007 pp. 661-683  www.emeraldinsight.com/0048-3486.htm.


• ghasemi, Rahim; Saeedi, Farid (2012). Re-engineering of the supply chain: an overview of the most important methods and models recent, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Fourteen years 38: 53-44. .[in Persian]


• GHorbani, Mahmoud; Alishad, Davoud (2006), re-engineering and its position in the organization, Journal of Management, 110-109, 1385: 35-29. [in Persian]


• Ghouchani, Farokh; Zamani, Fayeze. (2011). Re-engineering capabilities to improve their competitive strategies, Journal of  Strategic Management Studies, 6, 1390: 117-103. [in Persian]


• Gitinama, Sahar; Soleymaniha, Mojtaba (2010). Appropriate methodology re-engineering in higher education institutions, the monthly tadbir, 216: 41-36. [in Persian]


• Granberg, O. (1998). Lärande organizationer. Professionella yrkesöverares strategier vid organisatorisk föränring. Stockholm universtitet, Pedagogiska instititutionen: Stockholm.


• Hair J.F.,Jr., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R. E., Tatham R.L.,(2010), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.) New Jersy: Pearson Education.


• He-Chuan, S. (2010). Conceptual clarifications for organizationallearning, learning organization and a learning organization. Human Resource Development International, 6(2), p. 153-166.


• Homan, HeydarAli (2009). Structural equation modeling using LISREL software, Tehran, Publishers samt. .[in Persian]


• Jensen, P. E. (2005). A contextual theory of learning and the learning organization. Knowledgeand Process Management, 12(1), pp. 53-64.


• Jerez Gomez, P., Céspedes Lorente, J.J., Valle Cabrera, R., (2004). Training practices and organisational learning capability. Journal of European Industrial Training 28, 234-256.


• Kalmuk, G., & Acar, A. Z. (2015). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability on the Relationship Between Innovation and Firm's Performance: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 164-169.


• Kim, D.H., (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review 33, 37-50.


• Kline, R. B. (2010), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3th Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.


• Kock, H. (2007). The team as a learning strategy: Three cases of team-based production in theSwedish manufacturing industry. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(8), pp. 480-96.


• Kocoglu, I., Imamoglu, S. Z., & İnce, H. (2011). The relationship between organizational learning and firm performance: The mediating roles of innovation and TQM. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 9(3), 72-88.


• Kroeger, J.W. (2007). "Firm performance as a function of entrepreneurial organization and strategic planning practices", Doctoral dissertation, Department of Management and Labor Relations, Cleveland state university.


• Kululanga, G. K.; Edum-Fotwe, F. T.; & McCaffer, R. (2010). Measuring construction contractors'organizational learning. Building Research & Information, 29(1), pp. 21-29.


• Mahmoudi, Mehrdad. (2011). organizational learning Human - centered, message sea, 205: 47-44. .[in Persian]


• Marquart, Michael (2006). Creating a learning organization. Translator Reza Zali, city Tehran: University of Tehran, Center for Entrepreneurship. [in Persian]


• Michael Hammer, beyond re-engineering again, Translator Abdoreza, Rezainejad (1999). First Edition, Publishers rasa.[in Persian]


• Minvielle, E & et al. (2008). “Assessing organizational performance in Intensive care units: A French experience”. Journal of Critical Care, 23, PP:236-244.


• Mirkamali, Seyed-mohammad (2010).Educational Leadership & Administration, Tehran Yastoroon publication.[in Persian]


• Mohaghar, Ali; Shafighzadhe, Mohammad (2010). The role of organizational empowerment in the success of the implementation of re-engineering (study: Selected organizations of Iran), Journal of Science and Technology, the first year, (2): 116-97. [in Persian]


• Morales, V.J.; Garcı´, A.; Lopez, F.J.; Martı´n & Llamas-Sa´, R. (2007). Strategic factors and barriers for promoting educational organizational learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, pp. 478-502.


• Mortazavi, Said; Doayi, Habibullah (1995). Organizational development at the University, Journal of Studies improvement and Evolution management, 17 and 18: 102-85. [in Persian]


• Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.


• Panahifar, Farhad. (2010). Increasing the efficiency of production planning in an ETO system using re-engineering, Journal of Industrial Engineering, Year 20, Number 127: 15-12. .[in Persian]


• Popadiuk, S., Choo, S.W., (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: how are these concepts related? International Journal of Infor- mation Management 26, 302-312.


• Rahnavard, Farajollah (1999) organizational learning and learning organization. Journal of Public Administration, 43: 22-11.[in Persian]


• Ruth, A. & Sudi, S. (2010). Organizational learning and resistance to change in Estonian companies. Human Resource Development International, 5(3), pp. 313-331.


• Sampe, P. (2012). The influence of organizational learning on performance in Indonesian SMEs, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Cross University


• Sepehri, M (2002). Re-engineering processes organization, the Monthly Tadbir. 122: 53-50.[in Persian].


• ShahiBeyk, Azade; Hashemi, Leila. (2005). Re-engineering human resources through information technology, the monthly Tadbir, 163: 37-34. .[in Persian]


• Sharif-Zadeh, Fatah. (2000). The role re-engineering and information technology to improvement organizational performance, Journal of Studies improvement and Evolution management, 27 and 28: 48-25. .[in Persian]


• Slater, S.F., Narver, J.C., (1994). Market oriented isn’t enough: build a learning organizational. In: Marketing Science Insti- tute Report, N. 94-103. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.


• Srensen, J.B. (2002). “The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, PP:70-91.


• Swee, C. G., Catherine, E., & Tony, K. Q. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and business performance. 18 (3): pp. 275-283.


• Taleghani, Mohammad; malek‌Akhlagh, Esmail (2007). The Role re-engineering in improving organizational processes, Journal of Management, 119 and 120: 27-21. [in Persian]


• Tennant, Charles., Wu, Yi-Chieh., (2005) “The application of business process reengineering in the UK”. The TQM Magazine , pp. 537-545.


• Torkzadeh, Jafar; Sabaghiyan, Zahra. (2006). Organizational development in today's conditions, the nature and scope,  Magazine Outlook Business Commercial, number 19 and 20: 133-112. .[in Persian]


• Tsang, E. W. K. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50(1), pp. 73-89.


• Vaezi, Reza; Abbasi, Zeynab. (2006). Regarding reengineering and learning organization. Journal of Industrial Management Studies, Year 5. 12: 131-152. .[in Persian]


• Wang,hui;keneth s.law;zhen xiong chen(2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context,International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1809–1824.


• Watkins, K; Marsick, V.,( 2003). Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ). Sanfransisco.


• Yu-jun, Miao., (2010). “How Does the Enterprise Implement Business Process Reengineering Management”. s.l. : IEEE, International Conference on E-Business and E-Government pp. 4100-4102.

• Zahabioun, Shahla; Yousefi, Alireza (2007). The compliance Features organizational of education city Esfahan With Features learning organization From the perspective of teachers in year 1385-85. Knowledge and Research in Educational Sciences. (14).[in Persian].