پیش‌بینی مؤلفههای عشق‌ورزی براساس طرحواره جنسی با واسطه‌گری تعهد مذهبی در زنان و مردان شهر اصفهان
الموضوعات : فصلنامه زن و جامعهابراهیم قنبری 1 , هانیه معتمدی 2 , نرگس حیدریان فر 3 , ژاله رفاهی 4
1 - کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت، گروه مشاوره مرودشت، ایران و کارشناس پیشگیری اداره بهزیستی شهرستان فسا. فارس.
2 - کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت، گروه مشاوره مرودشت، ایران.
3 - کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
4 - گروه مشاوره، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.
الکلمات المفتاحية: تعهد مذهبی, مولفههای عشق, طرحوارههای جنسی زنان, طرحوارههای جنسی مردان,
ملخص المقالة :
هدف از این پژوهش پیش‌بینی مؤلفههای عشق‌ورزی براساس طرحواره جنسی با واسطه‌گری تعهد مذهبی در زنان و مردان شهر اصفهان بود. این مطالعه توصیفی-تحلیلی به روش همبستگی از نوع تحلیل مسیر انجام شد. آزمودنیها در این پژوهش 320 نفر بودند که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی انتخاب شدند و به پرسش‌نامه مثلث عشق (Triangle,1994)، آزمون تعهد مذهبی (Vrtygton test,2003) و مقیاس طرحوارههای جنسی مردان و زنان (Anderson et al., 1999) پاسخ دادند. برای تحلیل دادهها افزون بر روشهای توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف معیار) از ضریب همبستگی و تحلیل مسیر با استفاده از نرم افزار AMOS-16 برای برازش مدل فرضی استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان دادند که در مورد زنان رابطه طرحوارههای جنسی بر ابعاد عشق با نقش واسطهای تعهد مذهبی نشان می‌دهد که متغیر طرحواره جنسی با اثر مستقیم 05/0 بر ابعاد عشق اثر معنادار ندارد، ولی با اثر غیرمستقیم تعهد مذهبی، طرحوارههای جنسی زنان به مقدار 066/0- بر ابعاد عشق اثر معنادار دارد. در حالی که در گروه مردان رابطه طرحواره جنسی بر ابعاد عشق با نقش واسطهای تعهد مذهبی نشان می‌دهد که متغیر طرحواره جنسی با اثر مستقیم 10/0- بر ابعاد عشق و هم‌چنین، با اثر غیرمستقیم تعهد درونی، طرحواره جنسی مردان نیز به مقدار 22/0 بر ابعاد عشق اثر معنادار ندارند. با توجه به نتایج پژوهش نتیجه گرفته میشود که در ارتباط بین مولفههای عشق بر طرحوارههای جنسی تعهد مذهبی در گروه زنان نقش واسطهای ایفا میکند در حالی که در مورد گروه مردان این ارتباطها یافت نشد.
- Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love? Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 59-65.
Ahmetoglu, G. Swami, V. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The Relationship Between Dimensions of Love, Personality, and Relationship Length. Arch Sex Behav (39): 1181–1190.
- Amanelahe, A. Heydarianfar, N. & Aghaeiyan, B. (1389). Investigate the relationship between some antecedents and consequences of sexual satisfaction in married women university students Shahid Chamran, thesis advisers, Shahid Chamran University.
- Andersen, B. L. & Cyranowski, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079–1100.
- Andersen, B. L. Cyranowski, J. M. & Espindle, D. (1999). Men’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 645–661.
- Ayling, K. & Ussher, J.M. (2008). “If sex hurts, am I still a woman?” the subjective experience of vulvodynia in hetero-sexual women. Arch Sex Behav; 37: 294–304.
- Begue, L. (2002). Beliefs in justice and faith in people: just world, religiosity and interpersonal trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 375 – 382.
- Benjamin, M.R. (2006). Does religion in fluency patent starts faction, am health behave. 301, 85-91.
- Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1-25.
- Bradbury, T. & Graves, J. (1391). Emotional intelligence tests. (Translated by Mehdi Ganji). Tehran: Salavan. (date dispersion title main 2005).
- Buck, R. (2007). The evolutionary based of social and moral emotions: Dominance, submission, and true love. Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology Series, 9, 89–106.
- Court, D., & Givon, S. (2003). Group intervention: Improving social skills of adolescents with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(2), 46-51.
- Danesh, A. (1383). examines the relationship between marital satisfaction with sexual relationship satisfaction couple, the first National Congress of Family Pathology in Iran (abstracts), Family Research Institute shahid Beheshti University in Tehran.
- De Munck, V. C. Korotayev, A. De Munck, J. & Khaltourina, D. (2011). Cross-cultural analysis of models of romantic love amoung U.S. residents, Russsians, and Lithuanians. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(2), 128-154.
- Dion, K. K. & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspective on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53-59.
- Donaghue, N. (2009). Body satisfaction, sexual self-schemas and subjective well-being in women. Body Image (6) 37–42.
- Emanuele, E. Politi, P. Bianchi, M. Minoretti, P. Bertona, M. & Geroldi, D. (2006). Raised plasma nerve growth factor levels associated with early-stage romantic love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 288–294.
- Emil, M.L.N.G. & Jackie, Y.W.C. (2007). Prevalence and Biopsychosocial Correlates of Erectile Dysfunction in Hong Kong: A Population-Based Study July. Urology, 70(1):131-36.
- Engels, G. Olson, K.R. & 9merica, C. (2002). The personality of love: fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Journal of personality and individual Differences, 32 , 839 -853.
- Feng, D. & Baker, L. (1994). Spouse similarity in attitudes, personality, and psychological well-being. Behavior Genetics, 24, 357–364.
- Ghamranei, & Sadat Jafar Tabatabai (1385). investigate the relationships romantic Iran couples and its relations with marital satisfaction and demographic factors. News Journal of Consulting Researchs, Volume 5, Issue 17, Pages -95,109.
- Glasier, A. Gulmezolglu, A.M. Schmid, G.P. Moreno, C.G. & Van, L.P.F. (2006). Sexual and reproductive health: A matter of life and death. The Lancet, 368, 9547, 1595-1607.
- Gordon, R. M. (2006). What is love? Toward a unified model of love relations. Issues in Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28, 25–34.
- Griffiths, M. (2007). The psychology of love. Psychology Review, 12, 5–6.
- Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R.L. (2002). Passionate love and sexual desire: Cultural and historical perspectives. In A. L. Vangelisti, H. T. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 304-324). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Kaler, A. (2006). Unreal women: Sex, gender, identity, and lived experience of vulvar pain. Fem Rev; 82: 50–75.
- Kidwell, J. E.M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between religious commitment and forgiveness through quantitative and qualitative study. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 10891.
- Klaassen, M. Ter Kuile, M.M. (2009). Development and initial validation of the vaginal penetration cognition questionnaire (VPCQ) in a sample of women with vaginismus and dyspareunia. J Sex Med; 6: 1617–27.
- Koenig, H. G. (2007). Spirituality and Depression: A Look at the Evidence, Southern Medical Journal,Vol.100, Iss.7, 737-739.
- Litzinger, S. & Gordon, K.C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31: 409-24.
- Lupfer, M. & wald, K. (1985). An exploration of adults’ religious orientations and the their philosophies of human nature. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 25(3), 293 – 304.
- Lyon, B. & Ebright, P. (2004). The Role of Religious/Spirituality in Cancer Patients and their Care givers. Available from: WWW.The Free Library.Com.
- McCullough, M.E., & Worthington, E.L. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141-1164.
- Mickley, J.R. Soeken, K. & Belcher, A. Spiritual well-being, religiousness and hope among women with breast cancer. Image J Nurs Sch, Winter; 24(4): 267-72.
- Moradi Organi, A. (1391). Schema sexual relationship between sexual satisfaction and marital adjustment of married teachers in Falavarjan. Isfahan University graduate thesis.
- Pazmany, M.A. Bergeron, S. Van Oudenhove, L. Verhaeghe, J. & Enzlin, P. (2013). Aspects of Sexual Self-Schema in Premenopausal Women with Dyspareunia: Associations with Pain, Sexual Function, and Sexual Distress. International Society for Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med; 10: 2255–2264.
- Potten, S. (1986). Divorce its causes and consequences in Hindu society. Vikas, South Asia Books, pp. 220.26.
- Regan, P. C. (2012). Love, college style. In R. D. McAnulty (Ed.), Sex in college: The things they don't write home about (pp. 119-142).
- Ryff, C. D. Singer, B. H. & Love, G. D. (2004). Positive health:Connecting well-being with biology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B Biological Sciences, 359, 1383-1394.
- Santrock, J.W. (2008). Life Span Development. 11th edition. Mc Graw Hill: New York.
- Spence, S. (1386). Treatment of sexual dysfunction translated by Hassan Toozandehjani, Massoud Mohammadi, Jahanshir Tavakolizadeh, Mohamad. dahgan pour. Tehran: Couriers culture.
- Sprecher, S. & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 46(5/6), 131-147.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Love Story (fresh look at the relationship between man and woman), translated by Ali Asghar Bahrami (1386), second edition, Tehran: Publication buds growth.
- Sutherland, O. (2012). Qualitative analysis of heterosexual women’s experience of sexual pain and discomfort. J Sex Marital Ther; 38: 223–44.
- Swami, V. Stieger, S. Haubner, T. Voracek, M. & Furnham, A. (2009). Evaluating the physical attractiveness of oneself and one’s romantic partner: Individual and relationship correlates of the loveis-blind bias. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 35–43.
- Tjeltveit, A. C. (2006). Psychology’s love-hate relationship with love: Critiques, affirmations, and Christian responses. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 8–22.
- Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.). (2006), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Westheimer, C. R. & Lopater, S. (2005). Human Sexuality: A Psychosocial Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- Worthington, E. L. Jr. Sandage, S. J. & Berry, J. W. (2000). Group interventions to promote forgiveness: What researchers and clinicians ought to know. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 228-253). New York, New York: Guilford Press.
- Worthington, E. J.R. Wadfe, N.G. .Hight, T, L. Mccllough, M.E. Berry, J. T. & Ripley, J. S. .et al. (2003). ”The religiose commitment inventory 10; Development,refinement,and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling”.Journal of counseling .Psychology, 50 ,84 – 96.
- Zeidner, M. & Kaluda, I. (2008). Romantic love: What’s emotional intelligence (EI) got to do with it? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1684–1695.
_||_