Flexural behavior assessment of an eco-friendly thermoplastic composite sandwich panel with recyclable core and faces

الموضوعات :

Seyed Ali Mousavi ¹ , Hassan Shokrollahi ² , Hadi Sabouri ³

1 - Department of Mechanical engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Mechanical engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 24 الأربعاء , صفر, 1446 تاريخ التأكيد : 05 الجمعة , جمادى الثانية, 1446 تاريخ الإصدار : 28 السبت , جمادى الأولى, 1446

الکلمات المفتاحية: Sandwich structure, recyclable composite, thermoplastic composite, three-point bending,

ملخص المقالة :

This study investigates the flexural behavior of sandwich structures composed of glass fiber-reinforced composite laminates. The cores and matrices of these composites consist of Polyamide (PA), a thermoplastic polymer, which renders them recyclable and, in certain cases, repairable. Three-point bending tests were conducted on the sandwich structures, and the extensive results were thoroughly examined. The sandwich panel cores exhibit three distinct structures: honeycomb, re-entrant auxetic, and sinusoidal ligament. Various parameters were analyzed, including the absorbed energy by the structures, flexural stress on the laminates, shear stress on the cores, and the force-to-weight ratio. Notably, the re-entrant auxetic structure with a 2 mm cell thickness outperformed the other structures in terms of energy absorption and force-to-weight ratio corresponding to failure. Furthermore, the flexural tests revealed interesting differences among the core structures. The results show that the re-entrant auxetic and honeycomb structures exhibited greater brittleness compared to the sinusoidal ligament structure. Additionally, the sinusoidal ligament structure demonstrated an approximately 10% load increase as the thickness increased from 1.5 to 2 millimeters. Moreover, the displacement at the point of failure increased by approximately 17% for the sinusoidal ligament and about 30% for the re-entrant auxetic. These findings contribute valuable insights into the design and optimization of sandwich structures for various engineering applications.

المصادر:

1. Kassab, R., & Sadeghian, P. (2023). Three-Point Bending of Sandwich Beams with FRP Facing and PP Honeycomb Core. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Materials and Structures (pp. 29–42). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0503-2_29.
2. He, M., & Hu, W. (2008). A study on composite honeycomb sandwich panel structure. Materials Design, 29(3), 709–713. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.03.003.
3. Noton, B. R. (1957). Honeycomb Sandwich Construction for Supersonic Aircraft. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 29(1), 13–18. DOI: 10.1108/eb032782.
4. Grünewald, J., Parlevliet, P., & Altstädt, V. (2017). Manufacturing of thermoplastic composite sandwich structures: A review of literature. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 30(4), 437–464. DOI: 10.1177/0892705715604681.
5. Cheng, S., Yu, W., Zhao, X., Xin, Y., & Liu, X. (2017). Flexural behavior of composite sandwich panel of aluminum foam and epoxy resin. Emerging Materials Research, 6(2), 276–284. DOI: 10.1680/jemmr.16.00123.
6. Way, D., Sinha, A., Kamke, F. A., & Fujii, J. S. (2016). Evaluation of a Wood-Strand Molded Core Sandwich Panel. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28(9), 04016089. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001589MT.1943-5533.0001589).
7. Dinesh, S., Rajasekaran, T., Dhanasekaran, M., & Vigneshwaran, K. (2018). Experimental testing on mechanical properties of sandwich structured carbon fibers reinforced composites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 402(1), 012180. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/402/1/012180.
8. Franco-Urquiza, E. A., Dollinger, A., Torres-Arellano, M., Piedra, S., Alcántara Llanas, P. I., Rentería-Rodríguez, V., & Zarate Pérez, C. (2021). Innovation in Aircraft Cabin Interior Panels Part I: Technical Assessment on Replacing the Honeycomb with Structural Foams and Evaluation of Optimal Curing of Prepreg Fiberglass. Polymers, 13, 3207. DOI: 10.3390/polym13193207.
9. Kueh, A. B. H., & Siaw, Y. Y. (2021). Impact resistance of bio-inspired sandwich beam with side-arched and honeycomb dual-core. Composites Structures, 275, 114439. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114439.
10. Hou, Y., Tai, Y. H., Lira, C., Scarpa, F., Yates, J. R., & Gu, B. (2013). The bending and failure of sandwich structures with auxetic gradient cellular cores. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 49, 119–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.02.007.
11. Feichtinger, K. A. (1989). Test Methods and Performance of Structural Core Materials -1. Static Properties. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 8(4), 334–357. DOI: 10.1177/073168448900800402.
12. Masoumiasl, S., & Rahimi, G. (2019). Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of shape of ribs on flexural behavior of curved composite sandwich panels with lattice core. Journal of Science and Technology of Composites, 6(3), 351–362. [Online]. Available: http://jstc.iust.ac.ir/article_34591_0c18d896837d07cf1fa5555aec229795.pdf.
13. Ebrahimi, F., & Dabbagh, A. (2023). Porosity Effects on Static Performance of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Meta-Nanocomposite Structures. Micromachines, 14(7), 1402. DOI: 10.3390/mi14071402.
14. Indreș, A. I., Constantinescu, D. M., & Mocian, O. A. (2021). Bending behavior of 3D printed sandwich beams with different core topologies. Materials Design and Processing Communications, 3(4), 1–8. DOI: 10.1002/mdp2.252.
15. Betts, D., Sadeghian, P., & Fam, A. (2021). Experiments and nonlinear analysis of the impact behavior of sandwich panels constructed with flax fiber-reinforced polymer faces and foam cores. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 23(7), 3139–3163. DOI: 10.1177/1099636220925073.
16. Labans, E., Kalnins, K., & Bisagni, C. (2019). Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with cellular wood, plywood stiffener/foam and thermoplastic composite core. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 21(2), 784–805. DOI: 10.1177/1099636217699587.
17. Oliveira, P. R., May, M., Panzera, T. H., & Hiermaier, S. (2022). Bio-based/green sandwich structures: A review. Thin-Walled Structures, 177, 109426. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109426.
18. Gao, X., Zhang, M., Huang, Y., Sang, L., & Hou, W. (2020). Experimental and numerical investigation of thermoplastic honeycomb sandwich structures under bending loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 155, 106961. DOI: 10.1016/J.TWS.2020.106961.
19. Kassab, R. A., & Sadeghian, P. (2022). Sustainable sandwich composites made of recycled plastics. In Current Perspectives and New Directions in Mechanics, Modelling and Design of Structural Systems (pp. 246). CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9781003348443-246.
20. Ravindran, B., Feuchter, M., Schledjewski, R. (2023). Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Sandwich Composite Panels Made with Recyclates and Flax Fiber/Bio-Based Epoxy Processed by Liquid Composite Molding. Journal of Composites Science. DOI: 10.3390/jcs7030122.
21. Kormaníková, E., Kotrasova, K. (2022). Dynamic Behavior of Composite Sandwich Panel with CFRP Outer Layers. WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics. DOI: 10.37394/232011.2022.17.32.
22. Beigpour, R., Shokrollahi, H., & Khalili, S. M. R. (2021). Experimental and numerical analysis of a biodegradable hybrid composite under tensile and three-point bending tests. Composites Structures, 273, 114255. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114255.
23. Beigpour, R., Khalili, S. M. R., & Shokrollahi, H. (2022). Lightweight biodegradable hybrid composite sandwich panel under three-point bending loads—Experimental and numerical. Polymer Composites, 43(11), 8007–8029. DOI: 10.1002/pc.26944.
24. Cheng, H. C., Scarpa, F., Panzera, T. H., Farrow, I., & Peng, H. X. (2019). Shear stiffness and energy absorption of auxetic open cell foams as sandwich cores. Physica Status Solidi B: Basic Research, 256(1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201800411.
25. Kaboğlu, C. (2022). Investigation of sandwich composites with auxetic core under static loading. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 9(1), 350–359. DOI: 10.31202/ecjse.978310.
26. Harizi, W., Anjoul, J., Acosta Santamaría, V. A., Aboura, Z., & Briand, V. (2021). Mechanical behavior of carbon-reinforced thermoplastic sandwich composites with several core types during three-point bending tests. Composites Structures, 262(October 2020), 113590. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113590.