INVESTIGATING THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE HONEYCOMB YIELDING DAMPER(HYD)
الموضوعات :peyman shadman heidari 1 , Mohammad Ghanooni Bagha 2 , Zeinolabedi Mortezaali 3
1 - Faculty
2 - گروه آموزشی مهندسی عمران ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شرق، تهران ، ایران
3 - دانشجوی ارشد سازه، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد تهران شرق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: Yielding honeycomb damper, Ductility ratio, Initial stiffness, Effective stiffness, Equivalent viscous damping.,
ملخص المقالة :
Today, the use of energy-dissipating system such as yielding metal damper in structures can improve the seismic performance of structures. One of the characteristics of metal yielding dampers is the ability to dissipate high energy and increase the ductility of the structural system, which can improve the ductility and energy absorption characteristics of the metal frame equipped with braces and prevent the brace from buckling during an earthquake. The purpose of this research is introduce a new form of yielding dampers called honeycomb yielding damper (HYD) with different dimensions and thickness along with evaluating and comparing the force-displacement diagrams and investigating the seismic parameters of this type of yielding damper. All modeling and validation of numerical samples were done by Ansys software. Non-linear analysis method is used in this research. The hysteresis curves are obtained under in-plane cyclic loads. The mechanical parameters such as ductility ratio, initial hardness, effective hardness and damping coefficient can be determin. The results of this research showed that the effective stiffness increases by increasing the length and thickness of the sample. The ductility ratio decreases by increasing the height of the sample. the effective stiffness decreases by increasing the height of the sample. The ductility ratio increases by increasing the height of the sample. Also, the effective damping coefficient decreases with the increase in the height of the samples, the effective damping coefficient increases with the increase in length and thickness of the samples.
[1] Kelly J.M, Skinner R.1, Heine A.J. Mechanisms of Energy Absorption in Special Devices for Use in Earthquake Resistant Structures. Bulletin of N. Z. Society of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 3, 1972.
[2] Skinner R.1, Kelly J.M, Heine A.J. Hysteretic Dampers for Earthquake Resistant Structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 287- 296, 1975.
[3] Skinner R.1, Tyler R.G, Heine A.J, Robinson W.H. Hysteretic Dampers for the Protection of Structures from Earthquakes. Bulletin of N. Z. Society of Earthquake Engineering, Vol 13. No 1, 1980.
[4] Kasai K, Popov E.P. General behavior of WF steel shear link beams. J. Struc. Eng, 112(2): 362-382, 1986.
[5] Bergman D. M, Goel S.C. Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel plate device for added damping and stiffness. Report No. UMCE 87-10, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1987.
[6] Whittaker A.S, Bertero V.V, Thompson C. L, Alonso L.J. Seismic Testing of Steel Plate Energy Dissipation Devices. Earthquake Spectr; 7(4): 563-604, 1991.
[7] Tsai K.C, Chen H.W, Hong C.P, Su Y.F. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistance construction. Earthquake Spectra; 9(3): 505-528, 1993.
[8] Dargush G.F, Soong T.T. Behavior of Metallic Plate Dampers in Seismic Passive Energy Dissipation Systems. Earthquake Spectra; 11(4): 545-568, 1995.
[9] Gang Li, Hongnan Li. Earthquake resistant design of RC frame with dual functions metallic damper. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China, 2008.
[10] Soni A.H, Sanghvi C.S. Mathematical modeling of ADAS damper element and nonlinear time history analysis of SDOF steel structure using ETABS. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, 2012.
[11] Teruna D.R, Majid T.A, Budiono B. Experimental Study of Hysteretic Steel Damper for Energy Dissipation Capacity. Advances in Civil Engineering, Article ID 631726, 12 pages, 2015.
[12] Sahoo D.R, Singhal T, Taraithia S.S, Saini A. Cyclic behavior of shear-and-flexural yielding metallic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research; (114): 247–257, 2015.
[13] Garivani S, Aghakouchak A.A, Shahbeyk S. Numerical and Experimental Study of Comb-Teeth Metallic Yielding Dampers. International Journal of Steel Structures; 16(1): 177-196, 2016.
[14] Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z, javanmardi A. A new metallic bar damper device for seismic energy dissipation of civil structures. 14th International Conference on Concrete Engineering and Technology, 2018.
[15] Kiai, M. Evaluation of the performance of metal yielding dampers in steel structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Noshirvan University of Technology, Babol, 2018.
[16] Moghadasi M, Namazi A. Assessment of pearformance of TADAS dampers for the Seismic rehabilitation of buildings. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research; 11(21): 10516-10523, 2016.
[17] Yang T.Y, Tianyi Li, Tobber L, Pan X. Experimental Test of Novel Honeycomb Structural Fuse. The 14th Nordic Steel Construction Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 451-456, 2019.
[18] Yang T.Y, Banjuradja W, Tobber L. Experimental Test of Welded Wide Flange Fuses. key Engineering Materials; (763): 414-422, 2018.
[19] Shadman Heidari P. numerical study on mechanical parameters of novel drilled plate metallic damper (DPMD). Proceedings of the 2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 505-516, 2023.
[20] ANSI/AISC 341-16. Seismic provisions for structural steel buldings. An american national standard, 9.1-148, 2016.
[21] ANSYS Meshing User's Guide, (2016), Release 16.0. ANSYS, Inc.
[22] Jacobsen L.S. Steady forced vibration as influenced by damping. Transactions of ASME, 52, 169-181, 1930.
[23] Jacobsen L.S. Damping in composite structures, Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol 2, 1029-1044, (1960).
