The comparative impact of reasoning gap tasks and opinion gap tasks on young EFL learners’ classroom engagement
الموضوعات : Curriculum Research
Azadeh Khanzadeh Darabi
1
(
Department of English Language, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
)
Alireza Memari Hanjani
2
(
Department of English Language Teaching, College of Humanities, Islamshahr Branch, Islamshahr, Tehran, Iran
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Classroom Engagement, Opinion-gap Tasks, Reasoning-gap Tasks, Task-based Language Teaching,
ملخص المقالة :
This study examined the differences between the effects of reasoning gap tasks and opinion gap tasks on young EFL learners’ classroom engagement. The participants comprised 63 Iranian young EFL learners within the age range of 9 to 12 years old. These 63 learners were selected out of an initial number of 100 male and female EFL learners at the intermediate level based on their performance on a Flyers test. The 63 selected participants were divided into two intact groups consisting of 31 learners in the opinion-gap task experimental group and 32 learners in the reasoning-gap experimental group. Then, an engagement checklist was used by two raters in the two groups as pretest. After that, for ten sessions each lasting for 90 minutes, in one of the groups, the researcher carried out opinion-gap tasks while reasoning gap tasks were implemented in another experimental group. Upon finishing the treatment, the two raters used exactly the same checklist and obtained the posttest engagement scores. The analysis of the data through the parametric test of paired sample t-test indicated that both task types significantly impacted young EFL learners’ classroom engagement. Besides, the results of Mann-Whitney U Test revealed that there was no significant difference between the effects of reasoning gap tasks and opinion gap tasks on young EFL learners’ classroom engagement. Based on the results, EFL teachers are recommended to use both task types to enhance EFL learners’ classroom engagement.
Baralt, M., & Gómez, J. M. (2017). Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 28-43.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer Science.
Dadras, H. S., & Erfani, S. S. (2018). The Effect of Information vs. Reasoning Gap Tasks on the Frequency of Conversational Strategies and Accuracy in Speaking among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 12(1), 198-204. https://publications.waset.org/10008751/pdf
Dornyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self-system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19–30.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
Han, J., Geng, X., & Wang, Q. (2021). Sustainable Development of University EFL Learners’ Engagement, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments: Chinese Experiences. Sustainability, 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111655
Hughes, J. N., Wu, J.-Y., Kwok, O.-M., Villarreal, V., & Johnson, A. Y. (2012). Indirect effects of child reports of teacher–student relationship on achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 350–365.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1175–1188.
Jiang, A. L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). University teachers' teaching style and their students' agentic engagement in EFL learning in China: a self-determination theory and achievement goal theory integrated perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111655
Kazemi, A., Bagheri, M., & Rassaei, E. (2021). Impact of interventionist dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension and classroom engagement. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(39), 67-79.
http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_683924_d90d4b50673abc536edf13a7567f79c9.pdf
Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 190–206.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13–24.
Mvundura, E., & Svongoro, P. (2021). The significance of tasks in second language learning: The case of Africa University in Zimbabwe. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 1(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v1i4.779
Nakamura, S., Phung, L., & Reinders, H. (2020). the effect of learner choice on l2 task engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312000042X
Namaziandost, E., Hashemifardnia, A., & Shafiee, S. (2019). The impact of opinion-gap, reasoning-gap, and information-gap tasks on EFL learners’ speaking fluency. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1).
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311886.2019.1630150
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, Article 102128.
Pallant, J. S. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (4th ed). Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
Rabbanifar, A., & Mall-Amiri, B. (2017). The comparative effect of opinion gap and reasoning gap tasks on complexity, fluency, and accuracy of EFL learners’ speaking. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 16(4), 55–77. www.ijl lalw.org/finalversion1646.pdf
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579–595.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 700–712.
Sadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101060
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 223–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, 254.
Soleimani, M., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2021). Impact of Opinion-Exchange and Information Gap Tasks on EFL Learners’ Willingness to communicate. International Journal of Language and Translation Research, 1(2), 69-87.
https://www.ijltr.org/article_135596_d3c63f4818d5b378b1b98b549db4f944.pdf
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1–12.
Zand-Moghadam, A., & Samani, F. M. (2021). Effect of Information-Gap, Reasoning-Gap, and Opinion-Gap Tasks on EFL Learners' Pragmatic Production, Metapragmatic Awareness, and Comprehension of Implicature. TESL-EJ, 25(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1302259.pdf
