Predictive Assessment of Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Possible Accidents; A case study: Crude Oil Base
الموضوعات :
Jesús Luis Orozco
1
,
Julio A. Dueñas Santana
2
,
Luc Hens
3
,
Carlo Vandecasteel
4
,
Jo Van Caneghem
5
,
Irina Pedroso
6
,
Jonathan Serrano
7
,
Yanelys Cuba Arana
8
1 - Chemistry Engineering Department in the University of Matanzas, Cuba
2 - Scuola Superiore Meridionale, University of Naples Federico II. Naples, Italy
3 - Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Belgium
4 - Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Belgium
5 - KU Leuven, Campus Group T, Leuven, Belgium
6 - Chemistry Engineering Department in the University of Matanzas, Cuba
7 - Chemistry Engineering Department in the University of Matanzas, Cuba
8 - Centre for Advanced and Sustainable Manufacturing Studies, Spain
الکلمات المفتاحية: Accident, Risk, Explosion, Fire, Naphtha spill,
ملخص المقالة :
The development of facilities for the processing, storage, and transportation of oil generates a high level of risks, mainly related to fires and explosions, which might cause serious accidents with a severe impact on the population and the environment. However, the current situation related to COVID-19 has demonstrated the low risk perception of the people and authorities in some countries around the world. For this reason, many authors define predictive risk studies as a moral, legal, and economic necessity. Additionally, there are various methodologies that quantify these damages. However, there is a lack of an accurate combination of these techniques in specialized literature. This research offers a logical methodology which combines risk analysis techniques to address the quantification of economic, human, and environmental impacts due to fire and explosion accidents. Moreover, a case study in Crude Oil Base is analyzed, to estimate the possible economic, environmental, and human effects due to accidents related to fires and explosions. For this purpose, procedures and tools used internationally are carefully selected, such as the Probit equations, the Dow Fire and Explosion Index, and the ALOHA software. Finally, with this research, the high risk of continuing accidents, which lead to a major one in the Crude Oil Base, is proven. Moreover, a leak in naphtha tanks can cause serious economic, environmental, and human damage in the Crude Oil Base of the Territorial Fuel Marketing Division. Hence, the study carried out will allow the management to take measures that avoid or minimize fire and explosion risks that exist in the Crude Oil Base.
1. Belani A., 2010. It’s Time for an Industry Initiative on Heavy Oil. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 58(6), 40-42.
2. Guo S., Peng M., Ruan J., Wan W., 2013 Cause analysis of the fire and explosion during crude oil desulfurization in China. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 26, 961-967
3. Sánchez A., 2017. Cuba’s ambitions for energy self-sufficiency require major investment in the nation’s oil reserves and refining industry. Cuba’s oil: due for development. : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313790584. (Accessed 20 Jan 2021)
4. Laurenta A., Pey A., Gurtel P., Fabiano B., 2020 A critical perspectives on the implementation of the EU Council Seveso Directives in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 148, 47-74.
5. Ahmad S., Hashim H., Hassim,M., Rashid R., 2019 A graphical inherent safety assessment technique for preliminary design stage. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 130, 275-287.
6. Pey A., Lerena P., Suter G., Campos J., 2009. Main differences on European regulations in the frame of the Seveso Directive. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 87, 53-58.
7. FPA. 2015. Fire Safety and Risk Management for the NEBOSH National Certificate in Fire Safety and Risk Management. First edition. Ed. Routledge.
8. Renjith V.R., Madhu G., 2010. Individual and societal risk analysis and mapping of human vulnerability to chemical accidents in the vicinity of an industrial area. International journal of applied engineering research, Dindigul. 1(1). http://ipublishing.co.in/jarvol1no12010/EIJAER1013.pdf. (Accessed 23 Jan 2018).
9. Dueñas Santana J.A., Orozco J.L., Febles Lantigua D., Furka D., Furka S., García Cruz A., 2021a. Using Integrated Bayesian-Petri Net methodology for individual impact assessment of domino effect accidents. Journal of Cleaner Production. 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126236.
10. Gyenes Z., Wood M., Struckl M., 2017. Handbook of Scenarios for Assessing Major Chemical Accident Risks. EUR 28518 EN.
11. Dueñas Santana J.A., Orozco J.L., Furka D., Furka,S., Boza Matos Y.C., Febles Lantigua, D., González Miranda, A., Barrera González, M. C. 2021b. A new Fuzzy- Bayesian approach for the determination of failure probability due to thermal radiation in domino effect accidents. Engineering Failure Analysis. 120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105106.
12. Lees F.P., 2012. Loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control, fourth edition. ED. Mannan S., Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
13. Dueñas Santana J.A., González Miranda A., Orozco J.L., Cuba Arana Y., Febles Lantigua D., Serrano Febles J., 2020. How to determine individual risk due to toxic, fire, and explosion accidents in a hydrocarbon processing area? International Journal of Petroleum Technology. 7, 60-73. Avanti Publishers. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-787X.2020.07.6.
14. AIChE. 1994. Dow´s fire and explosion index hazard classification guide. 7th Ed. Published by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. New York.
15. Terrero A., 2017 Percepción de riesgo. Granma. Habana. Septiembre. 29, p 2. http://en. granma.cu/impreso/2017-09-29. (accessed 23 Dec 2017).
16. Ding L., Khan F.Y., Ji J., 2020. A Novel Approach for Domino Effects Modeling and Risk Analysis based on Synergistic Effect and Accident Evidence. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107109
17. Orozco J.L., Van Caneghem J., Hens L., Gonzalez L., Lugo R., Díaz S., Pedroso I, 2019. Assessment of an ammonia incident in the industrial area of Matanzas. Journal of Cleaner Production. 222, 934-941
18. Chen C., Reniers G., y Khakzad N., 2020. A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries. Safety Science, 125, Article 104618.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104618
19. Turton R., 1998. Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes. Ed Prentice. New Jersey.
20. BSI Standards. 1994, Draft British Standard Code of Practice for The Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles to Fire Safety in Buildings, London, UK.
21. Hadjisophocleous and Benichou. 2016. Fire safety design guidelines for federal buildings. NRC Publications Archive. https://nparc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/view/fulltext/?id=063cc389-d483-4a62-aa43-b163cf01138d (accessed 20 Jun 2017).
22. Moya, B. (2019). Personal communication. Main specialist in Meteorology. CITMA. Matanzas.
23. ALOHA. 2016. EPA Software. In www.epa.govcameoalohasoftware
24. User´s Manual ALOHA. 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Emergency Washington, D.C.
25. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OR&R 43. 2013. ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) 5.4.4. Technical Documentation. Seattle, WA. USA.
26. Abbasia T., Pasmanb H.J., Abbasi S.A., 2010. A scheme for the classification of explosions in the chemical process industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 147, 270-280
27. Susan D.F., Eckelmeyer K.H., Kilgo A.C., 2005. Metallurgical Failure Analysis of a Propane Tank. Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion (BLEVE). Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 5, 65-74
28. Misuri A., Landucci G.Y., Cozzani V., 2021. Assessment of safety barrier performance in the mitigation of domino scenarios caused by Natech events. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 205, Article 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107278
29. Laboureur D., Aprin L., Osmont A, Buchlin J.M., Rambaud P., 2013. Small scale thin-layer boilover experiments: Physical understanding and modeling of the water sub-layer boiling and the flame enlargement. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 26, 1380 – 1389
30. HSE. (2016). Prevention of fire and explosion, and emergency response on offshore installations. Third edition.
31. RESOLUCIÓN No.55. 2017. Ministerio de Finanzas y Precios. Habana. Cuba
32. Manual de Operaciones. 2008. Base de Crudos y Suministro. Empresa Comercializadora de Combustibles de Matanzas. Cuba.
33. Economic Indicators. 2019. Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, CEPCI. http://www. chemengonline.com/pci (accessed 12 Jun 2019).
34. BRYAN. 1986. Damageability of Buildings, Contents and Personnel from Exposure to Fire. Fire Safety Journal. 11, 15 - 31
