Effects of Irrigation Management and Humic Acid on Yield and Yield Components of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
الموضوعات :
Saeid Mahdavi
1
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran)
Naser Mohammadian Roshan
2
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran)
Majid Ashouri
3
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran)
Ebrahim Amiri
4
(Department of Water Engineering, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran)
Hamidreza Doroudian
5
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Irrigation, Seed yield, Humic acid, Peanut,
ملخص المقالة :
Peanut is an oilseed plant, which is rich in seed oil and protein content. The effects of different irrigation methods and humic acid dosages were explored on yield and yield components of peanuts in Astaneh-ye Ashrafiyeh County in Guilan province, Iran, in 2018 and 2019 cropping years. The experiment was laid upon a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in which the main plot was assigned to irrigation treatments including rainfed treatment and irrigation to meet 60%, 80%, and 100% of water requirement, and the sub-plot was assigned to humic acid (HA) at four rates of 0, 3, 6, and 9 L ha-1. The results showed that the highest biological yield (9750 kg ha-1) was obtained from the plants irrigated to meet 80% of their water requirement and applied with 9 L ha-1 HA and the lowest (2453 kg ha-1) was produced under rainfed conditions with no HA applied. Seed yield was 1863 kg ha-1 at the 80% water requirement level and 2067 kg ha-1 at the HA level of 9 L ha-1. Based on the results, it can be recommended to apply 9 L ha-1 HA and supply 80% of the plants’ water requirement as appropriate conditions for the studied region.
Abdipour M, Hosseinifarahi M, Najafian S (2019) Effects of humic acid and cow manure biochar (CMB) in culture medium on growth and mineral concentrations of basil plant. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 6(1), 27-38.
Abootalebi Jahromi A, Hassanzadeh Khankahdani H (2016) Effect of humic acid on some vegetative traits and ion concentrations of Mexican Lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) seedlings under salt stress. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 3(2), 255-64.
Abdzad Gohari A, Amiri A, Babazadeh H, Sedghi H (2018) Effect of salinity and irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of peanut varieties. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 49(2), 329-340.
Abdzad Gohari A, Sadeghipour A (2019) The effect of poor irrigation and humic acid on yield and water use efficiency in beans. Journal Water Research Agriculture. 33(3), 383-396.
Abou Kheira Abdrabbo A (2009) Macro management of deficit-irrigated peanut with sprinkler irrigation. Agriculture Water Management. 96, 1409–1420.
Agriculture Iran Statistics (2020) Ministry of Agriculture publication. pp. 89.
Ahmadi MR (2008) Quality and used of oilseeds. Agricultural Education Publisher. pp. 113.
Banavath JN, Thammineni Ch, Varakumar P, Sravani K, Krishna KG, Chandra SA, Sudhakar P, Chandra OR (2018) Stress Inducible Overexpression of AtHDG11 Leads to Improved Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Frontiers in Chemistry. 6, 1-21.
Barzegar T, Moradi P, Nikbakht J, Ghahremani Z (2016) Physiological response of Okra cv. Kano to foliar application of putrescine and humic acid under water deficit stress. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 3(2), 187-97.
Beheshti S, Tadayon A, Fallah S (2016) Effect of humic acid levels on yield and yield components of Lima beans under drought stress. Iranian Journal Cereals Research. 7(2), 175-187.
Celik H, Katkat AV, Asik BB, Turan MA (2010) Effect of foliar-applied humic acid to dry weight and mineral nutrient uptake of maize under calcareous soil conditions. Commun. Soil Science Plant Analysis. 42(1), 29-38.
Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology. 30, 239-264.
Costa M, Fernanda Ortuno M, Manuela Chaves M (2007) Deficit Irrigation as a Strategy to Save Water: Physiology and Potential Application to Horticulture. Journal Integrated Plant Biology. 49(10), 1421-1434.
Davoodifard M, Habibi D, Davoodi F (2012) Evaluation of the effect of salinity stress on cytoplasmic membrane stability, chlorophyll content, and yield components in wheat inoculated with growth-promoting bacteria and humic acid. Journal Agriculture Plant Breeding. 8(2), 71-78.
El-Boraie FM, Abo-El-Ela HK, Gaber AM (2009) Water Requirements of Peanut Grown in Sandy Soil under Drip Irrigation and Biofertilization. Australian Journal Basic Appllied Science. 3(1), 55-65.
Esmaeilpour S, Asghari J, Safarzadeh Vishkaei MN, Samizadeh Lahiji HA (2013) Effect of Sulphur and Zinc on Growth and Yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Iranian Journal Field Crops Research. 11(2), 283-290.
Fallahi HR, Ghorbany M, Samadzadeh A, Aghhavani-Shajari M, Asadian AH (2016) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and humic acid application on growth and yield of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) and its mycorrhizal colonization index under deficit irrigation. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 3(2), 113-28
Guilan Meteorological Quarterly. 2020. Statistics. pp. 24.
Haro R, Dardanelli J, Otegui M, Collino D (2008) Seed yield determination of peanut crops under water deficit: Soil strength effects on pod set, the source sink ratio and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research. 109, 24-33.
Janila P, Nigam SN, Manish K, Pandey P, Rajeev N, Varshney K (2013) Groundnut improvement: use of genetic and genomic tools. Plant Sciecne. 25, 125-136.
Krishna G, Singh K, Kim EK Morya K, Ramteke PR (2015) Progress in genetic engineering of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Biotechnol Journal. 13, 147–162.
Lamb MC, Sorensen RB, Butts CL, Dang PM, Chen CY, Arias RS (2017) Chemical Interruption of Late Season Flowering to Improve Harvested Peanut Maturity. Peanut Science. 44, 60–65.
Mace ES, Phong DT, Upadhaya HD, Chandra S, Rouch JH (2006) SSR analysis of cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Germplasm resistant to rust and late leaf spot diseases. Euphytica. 15, 317-330.
Maleki S, Pirdashti HA, Safarzadeh Vishkaei MT (2016) Yield reaction and yield components of peanut to the simultaneous use of iron and sulfur. Journal Appllied Research Plant Ecophysiol. 3(1), 59-74.
Meena HN, Bhalodia PK, Jat RS, Vekaria LC (2012) Prospects of using salinewater irrigation in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) cropping system in saline black soil of Saurashtra. Indian Journal Agronomy. 57, 9–13.
Najafi Mode M (2006) pressurized irrigation systems (translation). University of Mashhad. pp. 378.
Oveyssi M, Ghorchi A (2012) Overview of the role of humic acid in mitigating the effects of water deficit stress on crops. Bimonthly Journal Agriculture Sustain Development. 43, 16-21.
Songsri P, Jogloy S, Holbrook CC, Vorasoot N, Kesmala TC, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A (2009) Association of root, specific leaf area and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading to water use efficiency of peanut under different available soil water. Agriculture Water Management. 14, 790-798.
Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Songsri P, Jogloy S, Patanothai A (2004) Effect of available soil water on leaf development and dry matter partitioning in 4 cultivars of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Songklanakarin Journal Science Technology. 26(6), 787-794.
Wang H, Lu Y, Liu Y, Han X, Qiaobo S, Qingwen Sh (2015) Effects of Different Planting Modes on Peanut Photosynthetic Characteristics, Leaf Area Index and Yield in the Sandy Area. International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronic, Industrial Control Engineering. 14, 982-986.
Zaferanchi S, Salmasi SZ, Salehi Lisar SY, Sarikhani MR (2019) Influence of Organics and Bio Fertilizers on Biochemical Properties of Calendula officinalis L. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 6(1), 125-36.
