Manifestation of Simple Noun Phrase in Azeri Turkish Based on Role and Reference Grammar
الموضوعات : نشریه زبان و ترجمه
Afshin Dehghani
1
(ِDepartment of Linguistics, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran)
Mohammad Ali Torabi
2
(Department of Linguistics, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran)
Hanieh Davatgari Asl
3
(Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran)
الکلمات المفتاحية: core, noun phrase, Azeri Turkish language, Nucleus, Role and Reference Grammar,
ملخص المقالة :
In this study the construction of Azeri Turkish noun phrase is investigated in the frame work of Role and Reference Grammar and Van Valin's (2005) theoretical pattern. In this research, the data have been selected from written sources and by listening to the Azeri speakers' conversations in eastern Azerbaijan province. Only sentences containing simple noun phrases have been chosen using a purposive sampling method. Data analyses indicated that the simple noun phrase in Azeri Turkish consists of one or several dependents. In Azeri Turkish, the dependents either fall before or after the noun phrase nucleus, and there are constraints for their collocating together. A simple noun phrase includes layers, namely nucleus, core and a noun phrase, preceding and following peripheries with operators, and preceding additions. Various adjectives, including descriptive, objective, object of preposition(genitive), honor titles, reduplicative adjective, possessive adjective, reflexive pronouns, noun as adjective, quantifiers and appositives are at the peripheries of the noun nucleus. Noun complement mark, prepositional phrases, comparative and superlative adjectives, ambiguous(indefinite) adjectives, negation mark, numeral adjective, plural marks and all the words referring to the quantity of a noun are noun core operators. Demonstrative adjectives, definite and indefinite articles are noun phrase operators. Data analyses have shown that there are some characteristics that are specific to this grammar and are not seen in other formal and traditional grammars, and the relationship of various elements according to different layers of the noun phrase and its relationship with the core, nucleus and noun phrase can be explained.
Aram, Y. (2009). Derivation in Azerbaijani Turkish. (PH.D), Allameh Tabataba’ei University, Tehran.
Bejankhan, M., & Roshan Ghanbari, S. (2020). Degree of phonological contrast in contemporary persian language. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 12(1), 109-130.
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number: Cambridge University Press.
Ghaffari, A. A. (2017). conjugation in Azerbaijani Turkish within the framework of morphology and lexicology. (MA dissertation), Gilan University, Iran.
Görgülü, E. (2018). Noun Semantics and Number Marking in Turkish. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 15(1), 85-104.
Kavusinejad, S. (1997). Ellipsis in the Persian noun phrase. Journal of Farhangestan, 12, 146-166.
Ketrez, F. (2003). -IAr-marked nominals and three types of plurality in Turkish. Paper presented at the Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kolahdouzipour, I. (2020). structural analysis of the noun phrase’ preceding dependents in the Turkish language within the framework of X-bar Theory. Paper presented at the sixth international conference on the language and literature studies in the world of Islam, Iran.
Lotfi, Y., Gowhary, H., karimi- dustan, g., & Azizifar, A. (2020). Lexical Features of Verb Aspects in Laki Dialect of Darehshahr (Ilam). Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 12(2), 163-188. doi: 10.22108/jrl.2021.125078.1511
Lucy, J. A. (1996). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis: Cambridge University Press.
Michaelis, L. A., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 215-247.
Nabifar, N., & Shayegh, K. (2011). A syntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristics of simple causatives in Azeri Turkish and Persian languages on the base of role and reference grammar. Research Journal of International Studies, 22, 87-109.
Pavey, E. L. (2010). The structure of language: An introduction to grammatical analysis: Cambridge University Press.
Rasoulpour Hasanlou’ei, H. (2009). The Study of Compound Sentences in Persian Based on Role and Refrence Grammar (M.A), Ferdousi University, Mashhad.
Rezai, V. (2003). A role and reference grammar analysis of simple sentences in Farsi (Modern Persian). Ph. D. diss. Isfahan: Isfahan University. http://www. wings. Buffalo. edu. rrg.
Roberts, J. R., Barjasteh Delforooz, B., & Jahani, C. (2009). A study of Persian discourse structure: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Sezer, F. E. (1991). Issues in Turkish syntax: Harvard University.
Taylor, J. (2002). Cognitive Grammar-Oxford University Press Inc.
Uygun, D. (2007). Lexical Categories in Turkish. Ms. Boğaziçi University.
Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface: Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2014). Role and reference grammar The Routledge Handbook of Syntax (pp. 597-621): Routledge.
Van Valin, R. D. (1993). Advances in role and reference grammar: Benjamins Amsterdam.
Van Valin, R. D., van Valin Jr, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function: Cambridge University Press.
Wickman, B. (1988). The history of Uralic linguistics The Uralic Languages (pp. 792-818): Brill.
