Effects of Awareness of Fertilizer Subsidy on the Yield of Crops among Rural Farmers in Ghana

الموضوعات : Agricultural Extension

Fariya Abubakari ¹ , Farida Abubakari ²

1 - Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Institute- Soil Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana
2 - Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Institute- Soil Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana

تاريخ الإرسال : 13 الخميس , ربيع الأول, 1437 تاريخ التأكيد : 13 الخميس , ربيع الأول, 1437 تاريخ الإصدار : 06 الإثنين , ذو القعدة, 1435

الکلمات المفتاحية: beneficiaries, Fertilizer, Subsidy, awareness,

ملخص المقالة :

The study examines the effects of awareness of fertilizer subsidy on the yield of crops among rural farmers in Ghana. Random sampling was used to select six communities and 10 households per community. They include Bawku, Navrongo, Tolon kumbungu and Walewale from the Northern part and Ejura and Atebubu in the Southern part of Ghana. Primary data were collected from the sampled household by administering questionnaire. Descriptive statistics was used in analyzing the data and independent-samples t-test was used to compare the crop yield of farmers that are aware of the fertilizer subsidy program and unaware of the fertilizer subsidy program and mean was used to find the output of the beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries by using SPSS. Out of the 60 farmers interviewed in the study, male households head constituted majority 88.3%.Thepercentages of beneficiaries of the fertilizer subsidy program were 66.7% and that of the non-beneficiaries were 33.3%.Maize recorded the highest average output per acre 10.12kg/acre of beneficiaries of fertilizer subsidy program and the highest average output per acre 11.3kg/acre for the non-beneficiaries of the fertilizer subsidy program. Rice recorded the highest average output per acre 40.10kg/acre of beneficiaries before the fertilizer subsidy program and also recorded the highest average output per acre of beneficiaries after the fertilizer subsidy program. The results of the independent-samples T-test shows that, the group means 16.21 and 12.50 are significantly different because the value in the sig (2 tailed) row 0.01 and 0.03 are less than 0.05. This implies that, those farmers who were aware of the fertilizer subsidy program had higher crop yield than those who were unaware of the fertilizer subsidy program.

المصادر:

1) Beers, C. and Moor, D. (2005). Public subsidies and policy failures, UK, USA:  Edward Elgar publishing limited.

2) Braun, J. V. (2008). Rising food prices: What should be done? (Publication. Retrieved November 2009, from International food policy research institute, IFPRI policy brief 1 April 2008.

3) Chinsinga, B. (2007). Reclaiming policy space: lessons from Malawi’s 2005/2006 fertilizer subsidy program. Malawi: future agricultures www.Future-agriculture.org.

4) Crawford, E. W., Jayne, T S and Kelly, V.A.  (2005). Alternative approaches for promoting fertilizer use in Africa.  Agriculture and rural development Washington, D.C: World Bank, Discussion paper 22. http//siteresources.worldbank .org/ INTARD/Resources/ARD D P22 FINAL.pdf

5) Dorward, A., Chirwa, E.,  Boughton, D., Crawford, E., Jayne, T.,  Slater, R., Kelly, V and Tsoka, M. (2008). Towards smart subsidies in Agriculture? Lessons from recent experience in Malawi, Kenya and Zambia.

6) Dorward, A. (2009). Rethinking Agricultural Input Supply programs in A Changing World. London: Centre for development and environment and policy, University of London, school of oriental and African studies.

7) Jayne, T.S., Chapoto, A., Minde, I and Donovan (2008). The 2008/09 food price and food security situation in Eastern and Southern Africa: Implications for Immediate and Longer Run Responses.

8) Jayne, T.S., Govereh, J., Mwanaumo, A. J Nyoro and Chapoto, A. (2002). False promise or false premise? The Experience of food and input market reform in Eastern and Southern Africa, world development 30(11): 1967-1985.

9) Kherallah, M.C. Delgado., Gabre-Madhin, E., Minot, N and Johnson, M. (2002). Reforming agricultural markets in Africa. Baltimore, London: IFPRI/Johns Hopkins University Press.

10) Minde, I., Jayne, T. S and Crawford, E and Ariga, J and Govereh, J. (2008). Promoting fertilizer use in Africa: Current Issues and empirical Evidence from Malawi, Zambia and Kenya Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA). Mimeo.

11) Minot, M and Benson, T. (2009). Fertilizer Subsidies in Africa: Are Vouchers the Answer? International Food Policy Research Institute, IFPRI Issue Brief 60. July 2009- www.reliefweb.int /rw/lib.nsf/.../ifpri-fertilizer-subsidies-jul09.pdf? 

12) Morris, M., Kelly, V. A., Kopicki, R. J and Byelee, D. (2007).  Fertilizer Use in African Agriculture: Lessons learnt and Good Practice Guidelines. Washington DC: World Bank.