Performance of Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) on Floor and Cage Rearing System in Sylhet, Bangladesh: Comparative Study
الموضوعات :آ. رازی 1 , آ.اس.م. محبوب 2 , م.ی. میاه 3 , م.ر. حسنس 4 , م.کا. حسن 5 , م.ن. اودین 6 , اس.آ. بلال 7
1 - Department of Poultry Science, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
2 - Department of Poultry Science, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
3 - Department of Poultry Science, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
4 - Department of Poultry Science, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
5 - Department of Poultry Science, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh
6 - Department of Livestock Production and Management, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh|Department of Animal Science, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 561-756, Republic of Korea
7 - Department of Poultry Science, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet, Bangladesh|Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 561-756, Republic of Korea
الکلمات المفتاحية: Performance, quail, comparative study, floor and cage system,
ملخص المقالة :
A total number of 66 day old Japanese quail chicks divided into 2 treatment groups (33 in each treatment) with 3 replications in each having 11 birds (male, 5 and female, 6) were reared on floor and in cage system for a period of 5 weeks to know the effect of rearing system on growth performance and carcass characteristics. At the age of 35 days, average body weight and feed intake were 102.15 and 320.7 g/quail for cage and 78.41 and 146.02 g/quail for floor system, respectively. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was 3.89 and 4.10 for cage and floor system, respectively (P<0.01), at the end of study period. Body weight, feed intake and FCR were significantly (P<0.01) different between cage and floor rearing system. At the age of 21 and 35 days survivability were 72.72 and 72.72% for cage and 63.63 and 60.60% for floor, respectively. There was higher survivability in cage system. In case of meat yield characteristics, average weight of breast, thigh, wing, drum stick were 20.92, 7.37, 5.42 and 5.72 g for cage and 20.84, 7.35, 5.39 and 5.63 g for floor, respectively. There were no significant difference among average weight of breast, thigh and drum stick between two rearing system. In case of sex average, wing weight differed among sexes. It was concluded that cage reared quails showed better performance compared to littered floor rearing system.
Ahuja S.D., Bandyopadhyay U.K. and Kundu A. (1998). Performance of growing quail for meat under different cage densities. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 33(1), 8-14.
Akram M., Shah A.H. and Imran Khan M. (2000). Effect of varying floor space on productive performance of Japanese quail breeders maintained under litter floor and cage housing systems. Pakistan Agric. Sci. J. 37(1), 42-46.
Alam M.A., Howlider M.A.R., Mondal A., Hossain K. and Bostami R. (2008). Pattern of egg production in Japanese quail reared on littered floor and in cage. Bangladesh Res. Pub. J. 1(3), 239-249.
Anca P., Prelipcean A.A. and Teuşan V. (2012). Investigations on the structure, chemical composition and caloricity of the quail eggs, deposited at the plateau phase of the laying period.Lucrări Ştiin. Seria Zootech. 57, 113-120.
Ayasan T. (2013). Effects of dietary inclusion of protexin (probiotic) on hatchability of Japanese quails. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 83(1), 78-81.
Ayorinde K.L. (1994). Evaluation of the growth and carcass characteristic of the Japanese quail (Coturnix conturnix japonica) in Nigeria. Nigerian J. Anim. Prod. 21(1), 94-99.
Dogan N. and Tulin A. (2012). Effects of mass selection based on phenotype and early feed restriction on the performance and carcass characteristics in Japanese quails. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 18(3), 425-430.
Fouzder S.K., Ali M.L., Howlider M.A.R. and Khan N.R.M.Z. (1999). Performance of growing Japanese quails in cages, on slatted floor and on littered floor. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(12), 1059-1062.
Huque Q.M.E., Poul D.C. and Salahuddin M. (1992). Study of the performance of quail under Bangladesh condition. Pp. 34-37 in Proc. 4thNatal. Conf. Bangladesh Anim. Husb. Assoc. Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Jatoi A.S., Khan M.K., Sahota A.W., Akram M., Javed k., Jaspall M.H. and Khan S.H. (2013). Post-peak egg production in local and imported strains of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) as influenced by continuous and intermittent light regimens during early growing period. J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 23(3), 727-730.
Karousa M.M., Souad A., Ahmed Elaithy S.M. and E.A. Elgazar. (2015). Effect of housing system and sex ratio of quails on egg production, fertility and hatchability. Benha Vet. Med. J. 28(2), 241-247.
Narahari D., Ramamurthy N., Viswanathan N., Viswanathan S., Thangavel A., Murugnandam B., Sussarasu V. and Majur K.A. (1986). The effect of rearing systems and marketing age on the performance of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Cheiron. 15, 160-163.
Ojedapo L.O. and Amao S.R. (2014). Sexual dimorphism on carcass characteristics of japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) reared in derived Savanna zone of Nigeria. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol.3(1), 250-257.
Padmakumar B., Reghunathan Nair G., Ratnakrishnan A., Unni A.A.K.K. and Ravindrana N. (2000a). Effect of floor space on egg weight and egg quality traits of Japanese quails reared in cages and deep litter. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 31, 34-36.
Padmakumar B., Reghunanthan Nair G., Ramakrishnan A., Unni A.A.K. and Ravindranathan N. (2000b). Effect of floor density on production performance of Japanese quails reared in cages and deep litter. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 31, 37-39.
Panda B., Ahuja S.D., Shrivastav A.K., Singh R.P., Agerwal S.K. and Thomas P.C. (1987). Quail Production Technology. Publication CARI, Izatnagar, India.
Roshdy M., Khalil H.A., Hanafy A.M. and MadyM.E. (2010). Productive and reproductive traits of Japanese quail as affected by two housing system, Egypt. Poult. Sci. 30(1), 55-67.
Sharma G.I. and Panda B. (1978). Studies on some productive traits in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Indian Poult. Gaz. 62(1), 24-30.
Singh K.S. and Panda B. (1988). Poultry Nutrition. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.
