Physical Characteristics and Physically Effectiveness of Beet Pulp for Ruminant
الموضوعات :
ا. تیموری یانسری
1
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Sari University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran)
الکلمات المفتاحية: ruminant feed, beet pulp, physically effective fiber, physical property,
ملخص المقالة :
Beet pulp as component of cattle feed can be processed in different way. Tis study was performed to characterize the physical properties of so called fine beet pulp (FBP); normal beet pulp (NBP) and pelleted beet pulp (PBP). The following parameters were determined: bulk density, kinetics of hydration, functional specific gravity (FSG), water holding capacity (WHC), soluble dry matter and intrinsic osmotic pressure (IOP) were investigated. Furthermore particle size distribution and its geometric mean were determined according to ASAE S424.1. All three types of beet pulp had similar composition, but different acid detergent insoluble nitrogen, bulk density, WHC, hydration rate, soluble matter and IOP. PBP had the highest (0.967 g/mL) and NBP had the lowest (0.623 g/mL) bulk density. WHC was 4.318, 5.261, 4.881 (g/DM) and hydration rate 0.0527, 0.0663, 0.0657 (g/DM/Min) for FBP, NBP and PBP, respectively. Grinding and pelleting significantly decreased WHC. Initial FSG of FBP was higher than of NBP and PBP (1.416 vs. 1.371 and 1.384, respectively). FSG changed with incubation time as particle size decreased. Final FSG of all three beet pulp types were similar. FBP had the highest soluble DM (28.61 vs. 17.98 and 23.66% of initial DM in NBP and PBP, respectively). In addition, FBP had the highest soluble ash (45.18 vs. 37.79 and 39.36% of initial ash in NBP and PBP, respectively). FBP had the highest IOP and there are not significant differences between NBP and PBP. The studied physical properties were highly correlated with the chemical composition of the pulp. So was bulk density negatively correlated with the neutral detergent fiber (NDF), crude protein (CP) and non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC), hydration rate and WHC and was positively correlated with the DM, EE, FSG, soluble DM and ash, and IOP. In addition, WHC was positively correlated with dry matter (DM), NDF, NFC, CP and EE, but also negatively correlated with bulk density, FSG, soluble DM, soluble ash and IOP. FSG was highly negatively correlated with DM, NDF, CP, NFC, EE, hydration rate and WHC and positive correlated with bulk density, soluble DM, soluble ash and IOP. The physical properties of beet pulp aid in establishing the nutritive value of feedstuffs for ruminant. They physical properties of feedstuff take into account the modifying role of the reticulo-ruminal function on the speed of the character of the quantitative and qualitative biochemical degradation process.
Allen M.S. and D.R. Mertens. (1988). Evaluation constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes. J. Nutr. 118, 261-270.
AOAC. (2002). Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. I. 17th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
ASAE. (2002). American Society of Agricultural Engineers S424.1 Method of Determining and Expressing Particle Size of Chopped Forage. American Society of Agricultural Engineers., Saint Joseph, Michigan.
ASTM Committee on E02 on Terminology. (2000). ASTM Dictionary of Engineering Science and Technology. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
Bergen W.G. (1972). Rumen osmolality as a factor in feed intake control of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 34, 1054-1060.
Bhatti A. and Firkins J.L. (1995). Kinetics of hydration and functional specific gravity of fibrous feed by products. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 1449-1458.
Ehle F.R. (1984). Influence of particle size on determination of fibrous feed components. J. Dairy Sci. 67, 1482-1488.
Froetschel M.A. and Amos H.E. (1991). Effects of dietary fiber and feeding frequency on ruminal fermentation, digesta water-holding capacity and fractional turnover of contents. J. Anim. Sci. 69, 1312-1321.
Giger-Reverdin S. (2000). Characterization of feedstuffs for ruminants using some physical parameters. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 86, 53-69.
Grant R.J. (1997). Interactions among forage and non-forage fiber sources. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 1438-1446.
Hooper A.P. and Welch J.G. (1985). Effects of particle size and forage composition on functional specific gravity. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 1181-1188.
Kaske M. and Engelhardt W.V. (1990). The effect of size and density on mean retention time of particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 63, 457-465.
Katoh K., Sato F., Yamazaki A., Sasaki Y. and Tsuda T. (1988). Passage of indigestible particles of various specific gravities in sheep and goats. Br. J. Nutr. 60, 683-687.
Kononoff P.J. (2002). The effect of ration particle size on dairy cows in early lactation. Ph D. Thesis. The PennsylvaniaState Univ., USA.
Lammers B.P., Buckmaster D.R. and Heinrichs A.J. (1996). A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forages and total mixed rations. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 922-928.
Martz F.A. and Belyea R.L. (1986). Role of particle size and forage quality in digestion and passage by cattle and sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 69, 1996-2008.
Mertens D.R. (1997). Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 1463-1481.
Montgomery M.J. and Baumgardt B.R. (1965). Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 2. Rations varying in energy concentration and physical form. J. Dairy Sci. 48, 1623-1628.
Murphy M.R., Kennedy P.M. and Welch J.D. (1989). Passage and rumination of inert particles varying in size and specific gravity as determined from analyses of fecal appearance using a multicompartimental model. Br. J. Nutr. 62, 481-492.
NRC. (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7thEd.NationalAcademy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Robertson J.A. and Eastwood M.A. (1981). An investigation of the experimental conditions, which could affect water-holding capacity of dietary fiber. J. Sci. Food Agric. 32, 819-825.
SAS Institute. (1998). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Siciliano-Jones J. and Murphy M.R. (1991). Specific gravity of various feedstuffs as affected by particle size and in vitro fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 896-901.
Singh B. and Narang M.P. (1991). Some physico-chemical characteristics of forages and their relationship to digestibility. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 8, 179-186.
TeimouriYansari A. and Primohammadi R. (2009). Effect of particle size of alfalfa hay and reconstitution with water on intake, digestion and milk production in Holstein dairy cows. Animal. 3, 218-227.
Teimouri Yansari A., Valizadeh R., Naserian A., Christensen D.A., Yu P. and Eftekhari Shahroodi F. (2004). Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity chewing activity, digestibility and performance of Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 3912-3924.
Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583-3597.
Van Soest P.J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Durham and Downey Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Wattiaux M.A. (1990). A mechanism influencing passage of forage particles through the reticulo-rumen: change in specific gravity during hydration and digestion. Ph D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Welch J.G. (1986). Physical parameters of fiber affecting passage from the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 69, 2750-2754.
