Effect of acidity and physical properties of nanozeolite catalyst on hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil

الموضوعات : Iranian Journal of Catalysis

Mina Hadi ¹ (Catalysis Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran.)
Hamid Reza Bozorgzadeh ² (Catalysis Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran.)
Hamid Reza Aghabozorg ³ (Catalysis Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran.)
Mohammad Reza Ghasemi ⁴ (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)

تاريخ الإرسال : 11 الثلاثاء , شعبان, 1440 تاريخ التأكيد : 02 الأحد , محرم, 1441 تاريخ الإصدار : 09 الإثنين , شوال, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: Acidity, Hydrocracking, Beta nanozeolite, USY nanozeolite, Middle distillate,

ملخص المقالة :

In this study, beta nanozeolite, ultra-stable Y zeolite (USY) and amorphous silica-alumina (ASA) were synthesized. These compounds were used as the support of hydrocracking catalyst. Ni-Mo/beta zeolite-ASA and Ni-Mo/USY zeolite-ASA catalysts were prepared by the impregnation method. The samples were characterized with X-Ray diffraction (XRD), field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and BET methods. Catalytic behavior of these catalysts was evaluated on hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil at 400 and 55 bar in a fixed bed continuous microreactor. The XRD patterns of the prepared samples determined the phase structure of the samples. FE-SEM images of the nanozeolites indicated that the particle sizes of them are less than 10 nm. The results indicated that the catalyst containing USY with higher pore diameter and acidity was more useful in middle distillate products (87%), while the conversion of the catalyst containing beta zeolite was more than the other catalysts (44.8%).

المصادر:

[1] P.P. Dik, I.G. Danilova, L.S. Golubev, M.O. Kazakov, K.A. Nadeina, S.V. Budukva, V. Yu. Pereyma, O.V. Klimov, I.P. Prosvirin, E. Yu. Gerasimov, T.O. Bok, I.V. Dobrekova, E.E. Knyazeva, I.I. Ivanova, A.S. Noskov, Fuel 237 (2019) 178–190.
[2] Q. Cui, Y. Zhou, Q. Wei, G. Yu, L. Zhu, Fuel Process. Technol. 106 (2013) 439-446.
[3] L-E. Sandoval-Diaz, J-A. Gonzalez-Amaya, C-A. Trujillo, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 215 (2015) 229-243.
[4] I.C. Neves, G. Botelho, A.V. Machado, P. Rebelo, Eur. Polym. J. 42 (2006) 1541-1547.
[5] Q. Cui, Y. Zhou, Q. Wei, X. Tao, G. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Yang, Energy Fuel 26 (2012) 4664−4670.
[6] J. Francis, E. Guillon, N. Bats, C. Pichon, A. Corma, L.J. Simon, Appl. Catal. A 410 (2011) 140−147.
[7] A.A. Asadi, S.M. Alavi, S.J. Royaee, M. Bazmi, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 259 (2018) 142-154.
[8] L. Ding, Y. Zheng, Z. Zhang, Z. Ring, J. Chen, J. Catal. 241 (2006) 435-445.
[9] M.A. Ali, T. Tatsumi, T. Masuda, Appl. Catal. A 233 (2002) 77–90.
[10] D. Karami, N. Mahinpey, Chem. Engin. Commun. 203 (2016) 251-257.
[11] L. Ding, Y. Zheng, H. Yang, R. Parviz, App. Catal. A 353 (2009) 17–23.
[12] M. Heuchel, Ch. Dörr, R. Boldushevskii, S. Lang, E. Klemm, Y. Traa, Appl. Catal. A 553 (2018) 91–106.
[13] S. Chen, T. Li, G. Cao, M. Guan, US Pat. (2002) 6 399 530.
[14] C. Leyva, M.S. Rana, F. Trejo, J. Ancheyta. Catal. Today. 141 (2009) 168–175.
[15] M. Majka, G. Tomaszewicz, A. Mianowski, J. Energy Instit. 91 (2018) 1164-1176.
[16] J. Jiang, Zh. Dong, H. Chen, J. Sun, Ch. Yang, F. Cao, Energy Fuel 27 (2013) 1035-1039.
[17] M. Subsadsana, P. Kham-or, P. Sangdara, P. Suwannasom, Ch. Ruangviriyachai, J. Fuel. Chem. Technol. 45 (2017) 805-816.
[18] X. Wang, F. Guo, X. Wei, Z. Liu, W. Zhang, S. Guo, L. Zhao, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33 (2016) 2034–2041.
[19] C. Manrique, A. Guzmán, J. Pérez-Pariente, C. Márquez-Álvarez, A. Echavarría, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 234 (2016) 347-360.
[20] L. Ding, Y. Zheng, Z. Zhang, Z. Ring, J. Chen, Appl. Catal. A 319 (2007) 25–37.
[21] A. Hassan, S. Ahmed, M.A. Ali, H. Hamid, T. Inui, Appl. Catal. A 220 (2001) 59–68.