A Contrastive Rhetoric Analysis of 'Code Glosses' in Medicine Academic Research Posters Written in English by Native and Iranian Writers
الموضوعات : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)محمدرضا طالبی نژاد 1 , فریبا قدیانی 2
1 - دانشیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد شهرضا
2 - کارشناس ارشد، دانشگاه شیخ بهایی
الکلمات المفتاحية: Iran, native, Contrastive Rhetoric, Medicine, analysis, Code Glosses, academic posters, meta-discourse, non- native,
ملخص المقالة :
The present contrastive rhetoric study was aimed at analyzing 'Code Glosses' in a corpus of 60 Medicine Academic Research Posters (MARPs) written in English by Native and Iranian writers. To the best of the researchers’ knowledge, none of the previous studies had focused on this case. The two mentioned categories of MARPs published from 2012 to 2013 were selected randomly and regardless of particular specialty of medicine disciplinary. MARPs written by native and Iranian writers were respectively taken from F1000 posters site and Fifth International Congress (FIC) on Quality Improvement in Clinical Laboratories held in Tehran, Iran. Hyland’s (2005) model was used as the framework of the study and ‘Code Glosses’ were scrutinized in the corpus as the sub-type of meta-discourse markers. In line with the goals of the study the researchers conducted the following procedures: First, they performed the quantitative analysis of ‘Code Glosses’ by text analyzer_ MAXQDA software. Then, they performed the qualitative analysis manually to be sure of meta-discourse functionality of the counted markers in the context. Finally, they ran Chi- Square tests at α=0.05 to determine the probable significant differences between two categories of MARPs. The results of the study showed a significant difference between MARPs written by Native and Iranian writers in using rhetorical strategies regarding' Code Glosses'. It can be concluded that the observed difference was due to writers’ different first language and cultural context.
Alley, M. (2003). The Craft of Scientific Presentations. New York: Springer-Verlag, 211-217
Block, S. M. (1996). Dos and don’ts of poster presentations. Biophysical Journal 71, 3527-3529.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science 2, 40-57.
D’Angelo, L. (2010). Creating a Framework for the Analysis of Academic Posters....University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers. Vol. 2: 38-50
D’Angelo, L. (2011). Academic Posters across Disciplines: A Preliminary Study. University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers. Vol 3, 15-28
Fraser, J., Fuller, L., and Hutber, G. (2009). Creating Effective Conference Abstracts and Posters in Biomedicine. Radcliffe Publishing L.td. United Kingdom
Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization 7, 211-223.
Gherardi, S. (2001). From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations 54, 131-139.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman/Ann Arbor, MI: University ofMichigan Press.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25/2, 156-177
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133–151
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse. Applied Linguistics 28/2: 266–285
Kaplan, R.B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16 (1), 1-20.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
MacIntosh-Murray, A. (2007). Poster presentations as a genre in knowledge communication. A case study offorms, norms and values’. Science Communication 28, 347-376.
Matthews, L.D. (1990). The scientific poster: guidelines for effective visual communication. Technical
Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Frankfurt am main: Peter Lang.
Mauranen, A. (2001). Descriptions or Explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric. In Hewings, M. (Eds.), Academic Writing Context (pp. 43–54). University of Birmingham.
Miller, C.R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151-167.
Miracle, V. A. (2003). How to do an effective poster presentation in the workplace. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 22, 171-72.
Naerssen, Van M. (1984). Science conference poster presentations in an ESP program. The ESP Journal 3, 47-52
Paré, A., & Smart, G. (1994). Observing genres in action: towards a research methodology. In Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis, 146-154.
Salzi, G; Gölder, S; Timmer, A. et al. (2008). Poster exhibitions at national conferences: education or farce?Deutsches Ärzteblatt international 105, 78-83.
Swales, John 2004. Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G., and Thetela, P.(1995). The sound of one hand clapping: the management of interaction in written discourse. TEXT, 15(1), 103-27.
Valero-Garcés, Carmen (1996). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 15(4): 279–294.
