اثربخشی وبلاگ‌ نویسی به عنوان یک فعالیت کمک آموزشی در آموزش محیط زیست

الموضوعات :

مریم لاریجانی ¹ , سحر رشیدی ² , حسین میبودی ³

1 - استادیار گروه علمی آموزش محیط زیست، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشجوی دکتری آموزش محیط زیست، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

تاريخ الإرسال : 06 الخميس , رمضان, 1435 تاريخ التأكيد : 07 السبت , صفر, 1436 تاريخ الإصدار : 12 الأحد , ربيع الثاني, 1436

الکلمات المفتاحية: ارتباطات, آموزش محیط زیست, وبلاگ‌نویسی,

ملخص المقالة :

پژوهش حاضر، با هدف سنجش اثربخشی بهره‌گیری از وبلاگ به‌عنوان یک فعالیت کمک آموزشی برای آموزش محیط زیست به دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی انجام شد. روش تحقیق در این پژوهش شبه تجربی از نوع پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل بوده است. جامعه آماری کلیه دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی شهر رامهرمز می‌باشد. حجم نمونه آماری، به کمک جدول تعیین حجم نمونه کرجسی و مورگان، 88 نفر تعیین شد. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای، دانش‌آموزان در 4 گروه دختران و پسران (2 گروه مداخله و 2 گروه شاهد، هر کدام 22 نفر) قرار گرفتند. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته می‌باشد. داده‌ها به کمک آمار توصیفی و استنباطی تجزیه و تحلیل گردید. نتایج به‌دست آمده از مقایسه دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل، حاکی از وجود تفاوت معنی‌دار برای دانش شناختی، نگرش و رفتار محیط زیستی می‌باشد و در نتیجه در سواد محیط زیستی گروه کنترل و آزمایش تفاوت معنی‌داری وجود دارد. هم‌چنین، نتایج آموزش در گروه پسران در مقایسه با گروه دختران دارای تفاوت معنی‌داری بوده است و اثربخشی به نفع گروه پسران بود. نتایج نشان از اثربخشی وبلاگ نویسی به عنوان یک فعالیت کمک آموزشی برای آموزش محیط زیست به گروه مورد آزمایش می‌باشد.

المصادر:

1. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.


2. Baroo, L., Markman, L., & Rouse, C. E. (2009). Technology edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction. American Economic Journal, Economic Policy, 1, 52-74.


3. Brescia, W. F., & Miller, M. T. (2006). What's it worth? The perceived benefits of instructional blogging. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5, 44-52.


4. Cashion, J., & Palmieri, P. (2002). Relationships on the line. Retrieved February 15, 2004, from Aus web 02, http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw02/papers/refereed/quayle/ paper.html


5. Chong, E. K. M. (2010). Using blogging to enhance the initiation of students into academic research. Computers & Education, 55, 798-807.


6. Deryakulu, D., Buyukozturk, S., & Ozcinar, H. (2010). Predictors of academic achievement of student ICT teachers with different learning styles. International Journal of Human and Social Science, 5, 567-573.


7. Dron, J. (2007). Designing the undesignable: Social software and Control. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 60-71.


8. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Simon and Schuster.


9. Ebrahim Abadi, H. (2009). The pattern of use internet: Learning environment and the social and cultural context. Cultural Studies, 2(7), 97-118. (in Persian).


10. Ellison, N. B., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99-122.


11. Esmaeilnia, M., Monfaradiraz, B., & Kohestani, H. (2013). The relationship between the knowledge of information technology and empowerment of high school teachers in Bojnurd City. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 3(12), 85-100. (in Persian).


12. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in distance education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), 87-105.


13. Hosseini Nasab, S. D., Gol Mohammad Nejhad, Gh., & Sajedi Far, U. (2010). Studing the effect of blogging on academic achievement and interest to students learning English. Journal of Instruction And Evaluation (Educational Sciences), 3(10), 41-67. (in Persian).


14. Hricko, M. (2008). Blogs. In Lawrence A. Tomei. Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum integration. Hershey: Information Sclence Reference.


15. Hsu, C-L., & Lin, J. C-C. (2008). Acceptance of blof usage: The roles of technology acceprance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45, 65-74.


16. Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.


17. Karimzadegan, H., & Meiboudi, H. (2013). Effectiveness of environmental education on environmental knowledge of kindergarten children in Rasht city. Journal of Environmentally Friendly Processes, 1(4), 18-25.


18. Khaledi, M. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of technical and vocational educations, technical colleges and academic and appliedcourses in the separation of public and private and employment. Research Project of Organization of Labor and Social Care, Institude of Labor and Social Care. (in Persian).


19. Kharazi, S. K., & Esfandiari Moghaddam, M. R. (2010). Feasibility of commence virtual training for agricultural producers. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 6(1), 56-43. (in Persian).


20. Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 51, 1342-1352.


21. Lingelbach, J., & Purcell, L. (2000). Hands-on nature. Woodstock, Vermont: Institute of Natural Science.


22. MacBride, R., & Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Capitalizing on emerging technologies: A case study of classroom blogging. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 173-183.


23. Mahmoudi, M., & Veisi, H. (2005). An Environmental Extension and Education Approach to Primary Environmental Care. Journal of Environmental Science, 8, 57-64. (in Persian).


24. Matheson, D. (2004). Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism. New Media & Society, 6(4), 443-468.


25. Mcloughlin, C., & Lee, J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the web 2.0 era. ascilite Singapore. Retrieved 8 June, 2008, from http://www.slideshare.net/bemdrue/ berlined-presentation/


26. Niazazari, K., Behnamfar, R., & Andy, S. (2010). The influence of ICT on improving learning in elementary students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2(3), 31-43.


27. Niazazari, M., & Hosseini, Z. (2012). The evaluation of the influence of information technology on improving learning in math and English in secondary schools in Babol. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 3(1), 109-129


28. Niro, M., Haji Hossein Nejhad, Gh. & Asgari, M. (2012). Comparing the effectiveness of environmental education based on Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences and traditional method. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 5, 43-54. (in Persian).


29. Norouzi, M., Zandi, F., & Mosamadani, F. (2008). Ranking methods use information technology in teaching-learning process in schools. Journal of Educational Innovations, 7(26), 34-9. (in Persian).


30. Ozkamp. A., S. (2009). Applied socialpsychology (Translation by Maher, F.). Publications: Astan Ghods.


31. Papzan, A., Mahdizadeh, H., & Motamednia, Z. (2011). The relationship between environmental education and e-readiness of owners and managers of agricultural enterprises. Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2(1), 119-139.


32. Pascu, C. (2008). An empirical analysis of the creation, use and adoption of socialcomputing applications: IPTS exploratory research on social computing. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC46431.pdf


33. Pettenatti, M. C., Cigognini, E., Mangione, J., & Guenn, E. (2007). Using social software for personal knoweldge management in formal online learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3).


34. Pinkman, K. (2005). Using blogs foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner indepence. The Jalt Call Journal, 1(1), 12-24.


35. Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC Information Reference Center.


36. Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83-94.


37. Seraji. F., & Ataran, M. (2009). Investigating about the effect of participation at website wirting as learning activities for teching studends to getting learning experiences. International Conference on E-learning, Iran University of Science and Technology. (in Persian).


38. Seyedan, N. (2011). Teacher's perspective regarding the feasibility of using new technologies in environmental education to students. M.S. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran. (in Persian).


39. Soleymanpoor, J., Khalkhali, A., & Raayat Konande Fallah, L. (2011) The Effect of ict-based teaching methods in creating sustained learning in experimental science course in third grade secondary school students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(2), 77-93.


40. Taher Khani, S. (2009). Providing a theoretical framework for environmental education in primary school with an emphasis on educational methods. M.Sc. Thesis of Environmental Education, Payam Noor University, Tehran. (in Persian).


41. Top, E., Yukselturk, E., & Inan, F. A. (2010). Reconsidering usage of blogging in preservice teacher education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 214-217.


42. Tsai, Y. (2009). Blended learning via blogging: The impact of blog-assisted instruction on learning satisfaction. Unpublished Master's thesis, Graduate Institute of Telecom- munications, China.


43. Zhang, S., X., Olfman, L., & Ractham, P. (2007). Designing ePortfolio 2.0: Integrating and coordinating Web 2.0 services with ePortfolio systems for enhancing users' learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(2), 203-214.