Genre Analysis of English Abstracts and Their Persian Translations

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Alireza Bahremand ¹ , Esmail Zainodiny Mofrad ² , alireza bahremand ³

1 - MA in Translation studies, Faculty member at English Language and Literature, College of Literature and Humanities, Velayat University, Iranshahr, Iran
2 - MA in Translation studies, Faculty Member at English Language and Literature, Velayat University, Iranshahr, Iran
3 - MA in Translation studies, Faculty of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

Received: 2021-09-02 Accepted : 2021-09-02 Published : 2021-09-01

Keywords: move, genre, Genre Analysis, translation,

Abstract :

This research aimed to investigate English and Persian abstracts of TEFL theses. To achieve the study's objective, 120 English thesis abstracts and their Persian translations of Iranian TEFL students at the MA level at different universities of Iran were collected and then analyzed. The sampling method used was purposive sampling. First, two raters' qualitative content analysis was done based on Swales’ (2004) model. Then, the frequencies and percentages of different moves were calculated in the English and Persian corpora. Finally, Chi-square tests were run to check the significance of the difference between the frequencies of different English and Persian corpora moves. The results showed the occurrence of various moves in the English corpus. The results also confirmed that other moves were present in the Persian corpus. Finally, the results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between the frequencies of different moves in the two corpora, except Move 1 Step 2 Making topic generalizations, Move 2 Step 1B Indicatina gap, Move 2 Step 1C Question raising, and Move 3 step 6 (PISF) Stating the value of the present research.

References:

Abdollahzadeh, E., & Salarvand, H. (2013). Book prefaces inprimaryc, applied and social sciences: A genre-based study.

Afshar, H. S., Doosti, M., & Movassagh, H. (2018). A genre analysis of the introduction section of applied linguistics and chemistry research articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 163-214.

Al-Zubaidi, N. A., & Jasim, T. A. (2016). Preface Sections in English and Arabic Linguistics Books: A Rhetorico-Cultural Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 25-32.

Asghar, S. A., Asghar, Z. M., & Mahmood, M. A. (2015). A Genre Analysis of Preface Sections of Textbook. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 58-63.

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis: A&C Black.

Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzinggenre: Language use in pro 一 fessional settings LMJ. London & NY: Longman.

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2004). The genre of grant proposals: A corpus. Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics, 24, 235.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. Talking about text, 14, 128.

Ershadi, S., & Farnia, M. (2017). Comparative generic analysis of discussions of English and Persian computer research articles. Komunikacija i kultura online, 6(6), 15-31.

Farnia, M., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Comparative generic analysis of introductions of English and Persian dentistry research articles. Research in English language pedagogy, 5(1), 27-40.

Flowerdew, J., & Dudley‐Evans, T. (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied linguistics, 23(4), 463-489.

Ghazanfari, M., Mohtasham, N. H., & Amirsheibani, M. (2016). Genre analysis of Nursing and ELT academic written discourse. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 973.

Jalilifar, A., & Golkar Musavi, Z. (2016). Genre analysis and genre-mixing across various realizations of academic book introductions in applied linguistics. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(1), 111-138.

Keshavarz, M. H., Atai, M. R., & Barzegar, V. (2007). A contrastive study of generic organization of research article introductions written by Iranian and non-Iranian writers in applied linguistics. Teaching English Language, 1(2), 13-33.

Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2010). A comparative study of introduction and discussion sections of sub-disciplines of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 97-122.

Kuhi, D. (2008). An analysis of the move structure of textbook prefaces. Asian ESP Journal, 7, 63-78.

Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2000). Student writing in higher education: New contexts: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.

Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for specific purposes, 23(3), 280-302.

Maktiar Singh, K. K., Mohamad Ali, A., Chan, M. Y., & Tan, H. (2019). A genre-based investigation of the introduction sections of academic oral presentations. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(2), 1-31.

Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. Children writing: reader, 1, 984.

Martı́n, P. M. n. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for specific purposes, 22(1), 25-43.

Massoum, Y. H., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2019). A genre-analysis of the discussion section of Iranian and English ELT theses: A comparative study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1611-1623.

Nguyen, L. T. T., & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Move analysis of results-discussion chapters in TESOL master’s theses written by Vietnamese students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 21(2).

Poudel, A. P. (2018). Academic Writing: Coherence and Cohesion in Paragraph (Research Project). Dhankut M. Campus, Dhankuta, Nepal. Available online: https://www. researchgate. net/publication/322537095_Academic_Writing_Coherence_and_Cohesion_in_Paragraph (accessed on 3 November 2019).

Rashidi, N., & Ghaffarpour, H. (2012). A generic analysis of academic written discourses: TEFL and Astrophysics in contrast. Teaching English Language, 6(1), 161-184.

Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for specific purposes, 22(4), 365-385.

Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for academic purposes, 7(1), 55-67.

Shirani, S., & Chalak, A. (2016). A genre analysis study of Iranian EFL learners’ master theses with a focus on the introduction section. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(10), 1982-1987.

Soodmand Afshar, H., & Ranjbar, A. (2017). A Comparative Study of Rhetorical Moves Adopted in Research Questions and Method Sections of Applied Linguistics Research Articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 46-71.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions Aston ESP Research Report 1. Language Studies Unit.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications: Cambridge University Press.

Trosborg, A. (2000). Analysing professional genres (Vol. 74): John Benjamins Publishing.

Vyncke, M. (2012). The Concept and practice of critical thinking in academic writing: An investigation of international students' perceptions and writing experiences. King's College London,

Zekrati, S. (2015). A Move Analysis of Discussion Section of Medical Articles. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 7(1), 38-50.