اثر زمان برداشت بر عملکرد ریشه و برخی خصوصیات کیفی ارقام تجارتی چغندرقند در خوی

محورهای موضوعی : توليد محصولات زراعي

زهرا حبيبي ¹ (دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد خوی، دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد زراعت، خوی، ایران )

تاریخ دریافت : 1389/07/05 تاریخ پذیرش : 1390/08/08 تاریخ انتشار : 1389/07/17

کلید واژه: ارقام, تاریخ برداشت, چغندرقند, عملکرد ریشه و عیار قند,

چکیده مقاله :

به منظور مطالعه تاثیر زمان برداشت بر روی برخی خصوصیات کمي و کیفی چغندرقند، سه تاریخ برداشت (30 مهر، 15 آبان و30 آبان) بر روی پنج رقم هیبرید چغندرقند (افشاری، زرقان، شیرین، رسول و جلگه) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. این تحقیق به صورت آزمایش فاکتوریل با طرح پایه بلوک های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار طی سال 1388 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی شهرستان خوی اجرا شد. کشت در اواخر فروردین ماه و عملیات داشت بر اساس توصیه ها و به صورت یکنواخت برای همه تیمارها انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که بین ارقام اختلاف معنی داری از نظر درصد قند، درصد قند سفید، ضریب قلیائیت و مقدار ناخالصی های سدیم و نیتروژن وجود داشت. رقم رسول درصد قند و قند سفيد بیشتری نسبت به سایر ارقام داشت. اختلاف بین تاریخ های برداشت نیز از نظر عملکرد ریشه، درصد قند، قند سفيد ، عملکرد قند ناخالص و عملکرد قند سفید معنی دار بود. حداکثر عملکرد ریشه در برداشت 30 آبان به میزان 360/94 تن در هکتار به دست آمد. بیشترین درصد قند و قند سفيد نيز مربوط به تاریخ برداشت 30 آبان بود. همچنين بالاترین عملکرد قند خام و محصول قند سفید نیز به ترتیب با 98/12 تن و 34/10 تن در هکتار متعلق به تاريخ برداشت 30 آبان بود که نسبت به دو تاریخ برداشت دیگر، اختلاف معنی دار داشت.

چکیده انگلیسی:

To study the effect of harvesting time on the quantity and quality of sugar beet, 3 harvest dates (October 22nd, November 6th& November 21st) and on the five varieties of sugar beet (Afshari, Zarghan, Shirin, Rasul& jolgheh) were evaluated. The study was conducted in factorial experiment based on complete block design with three replications in Khoy Agricultural Research Center during 2009. Cultivation operations in mid-April, based on recommendations and the same for all treatments were performed. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between cultivars in terms of sugar content, white sugar content, alkality, sodium and nitrogen impurities. Variety of Rasul sugar content and white sugar content was more than other varieties. The difference between harvesting dates of the root yield, sugar content, white sugar content, white sugar yield and sugar yield was significant. November 21st harvest root yield found with 94.360 tons per hectare more than previous harvest dates. The highest sugar content, white sugar content was related to the date of November 21st and was higher than other harvest dates. The highest sugar yield and white sugar yield respectively, 12.98 and 10.34 tons per hectare belonged to November 30th harvest. That was of significant difference rather than two other dates.

منابع و مأخذ:

Abdollahian Noghabi, M . 1994. Study of some Parameters growing of sugar beet in Mashad Region. sugar beet Journal. 10 (1, 2): 35- 42. (In Persian).
Ashraf Mansuri, G. and L. Jokar. 2004. Effect of Planting Pattern on the Quantitative and Quality Characteristic in monogerm hybrid varieties of sugar beet in Oglid and Zargan Region. Abstracts of 8th Iranian Agronomy and plant breeding Congress. Gelan University. 3-5 Shahrivar. 336 Pp. (In Persian).
Azari, M.T., G.R. Khalil Zadeh., and A. Gharib Eshgi. 2004. Evaluation of Root Yield and Sugar Content of new Sugar Beet Cultivars in Different Planting Dates in Moghan Region. Abstracts of 8th Iranian Agronomy and plant breeding Congress. Gilan University. 3-5 Shahrivar. 327 Pp. (In Persian).
BagaiKeya, M. 2000. study the effect of harvesting time on the quantity and quality characteristics of five varieties of sugar beet in Peranshr Region. Abstracts of 6th Iranian Agronomy and plant breeding Congress. Babolsar. Mazandaran University. 12-16 Shahrivar. 336 Pp. (In Persian).
 Besheit, S. and A. Gharbawy. 1991. Cultivars, harvesting dates and their effect on yield and
quality of sugar beet. Annual of Agricultural Science Moshtohor. 29: 717-728.
 Cakmakci, R. and N. Tingir. 2001. The effect of growing period on growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Atatürk Universitesi, 32(1): 41-49.
 Carboni, G., M. Fois., M. Lendini., and A.Virdis. 2000. Sugarbeet cultivars for autumn sowing in Sardinia. Informatore Agrario, 56(41) 61-63.
Cook, D. A., and R. K. Scott. 1993. The Sugar Beet Crop. Chapman and Hall Pub. 654PP.
Goto, A., M. Sato., M. Sasaoka., K. fujii., A. Shinsenji., T. Sugawara., and M. Kimura. 1992.
Interaction between varietal characteristics and environmental conditions. (1) Location of experiment and harvest time. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 34: 64-69.
Ebrahimian, H.R. 1993. Effect of harvesting date and growing period on growth during of sugar beet. Abstracts of 1th Iranian Agronomy and plant breeding congress. University of Tehran. 15-18 Shahrivar. 131 Pp. (In Persian).
Ebrahimi Kulaei, H. 2002. Determination of favorite harvesting date of three sugar beet varieties in Hamedan.sugar beet Journal.18(2):131-142. . (In Persian).
Ebrahimian, H. R., S.Y. Sadeghian., M. R. Jahad Akbari., and Z. Abasi. 2008. Study of adaptability and stability of sugar beet monogerm cultivars in different locations of Iran. sugar beet Journal. 24(2):1-3. (In Persian).
Hayashida, M., S. Takada., and H. Dempo. 1989. The distribution of sucrose and non-sucrose substances in sugar beet roots. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 31: 30-34.
 Jozefyová, L., J. Urban., and J. Pulkrábek. 2002. The influence of harvest time delaying on yield of sugar beet and sugar. Listy Cukrovarnické a Reparské,118(9/10):205-207.
Keshavarz, S., M. Mesbah., Z. Ranji., and R. Amiri. 2001. Study on stability parameters for determining the adaptation of sugar beet commercial varieties in different areas of Iran. sugar beet Journal. 17(2): 15-36. (In Persian).
Kolivand, M. 1993. Study on the Sugar Beet Growth Pattern in Kermanshah Region. Abstracts of 1thIranian Agronomy and plant breeding congress. University of Tehran. 15-18 Shahrivar. 149 Pp. (In Persian).
 Lauer, J.G. 1995. Sugar beet performance and interactions with planting date, and harvest date. Agronomy Journal. 89: 469-475.
Shibayama, T., S. Takada., and M. Hayashida. 1989. Interaction between varietal characteristics and environmental factors( 5). Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 31:13-19.
Sohrabi,Y., M.R. Shakiba., and M. Abdollahian., 2006. Investigation of limited irrigation and root harvesting dates on yield and some of quality charactrestics of sugar beet. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi.70:8-15. (In Persian).
Takada, S., H. Dempo., and M. Hayashida. 1988. Interaction between varietal characteristics and environmental factors(4). Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. 30: 23-28.