Guidelines for Assessing and Enhancing the Organizational Human Resources Sprightliness: A Call to Action!
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت منابع انسانی
بهنوش جووری
1
(
استادیار ،گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
)
کلید واژه: Organizational Sprightliness, Human Resources, Kleizeri Methodology, Cohen's kappa. ,
چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of this applied and qualitative research is to identify the necessary infrastructure for creating Organizational Human Resources Sprightliness in the university environment. Data collection has been done using the method of targeted observation, semi-structured interviews, and the review of documents related to the strategic and operational plans of universities. Based on the Kleizeri methodology, In the selective coding, obstacles of human resources Sprightliness management from the perspective of university members were identified including: weakness in talent management and substitution, structural inadequacies, neglect of the cultivation of positive psychological capacities in members, lack of support for members' organizational and family responsibilities, and abandonment of scientific-executive abilities of members in a competitive environment. Responding to the environmental needs of the university, honoring the stakeholders, dynamic knowledge, communication, skill of members of the academic members, and the flourishing of educational-research activities were drivers of human resources Sprightliness management. By calculating Cohen's kappa, the average coefficient of experts' agreement with each other about codes and research findings was 0.66, which is an acceptable proportion of their agreement. The coefficiency of agreement between experts and researcher was 79%, which was calculated by rounding the same 80%, which means that five experts had good agreement with each other regarding the coding of the data for this research, which indicates the excellent status of these identified concepts.
The purpose of this applied and qualitative research is to identify the necessary infrastructure for creating Organizational Human Resources Sprightliness in the university environment. Data collection has been done using the method of targeted observation, semi-structured interviews, and the review of documents related to the strategic and operational plans of universities. Based on the Kleizeri methodology, In the selective coding, obstacles of human resources Sprightliness management from the perspective of university members were identified including: weakness in talent management and substitution, structural inadequacies, neglect of the cultivation of positive psychological capacities in members, lack of support for members' organizational and family responsibilities, and abandonment of scientific-executive abilities of members in a competitive environment. Responding to the environmental needs of the university, honoring the stakeholders, dynamic knowledge, communication, skill of members of the academic members, and the flourishing of educational-research activities were drivers of human resources Sprightliness management. By calculating Cohen's kappa, the average coefficient of experts' agreement with each other about codes and research findings was 0.66, which is an acceptable proportion of their agreement. The coefficiency of agreement between experts and researcher was 79%, which was calculated by rounding the same 80%, which means that five experts had good agreement with each other regarding the coding of the data for this research, which indicates the excellent status of these identified concepts.
Abduraimi, P. B., Mustafi, M., & Islami, X. (2023). The role of organizational culture on employee engagement. Business: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.17241
Akhavan Sarraf, A. R., Abzari, M., Nasr Isfahani, A., & Fathi, S. (2017). Generational differences in job engagement: a case study of an industrial organization in Iran. Industrial and Commercial training, 49(3), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-10-2016-0068
Alkaser, S. A. (2021). Implementation of Administrative Empowerment in Tackling Organizational Problems as Perceived by Female Leaders at Shaqra University. Journal of Service Science and Management, 14(6), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2021.146037
Alkorashy, H., & Alanazi, M. (2023). Personal and Job-Related Factors Influencing the Work Engagement of Hospital Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia. Healthcare, 11(4), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040572
Appel, D., Schäfer, E., & Appel, C. (2023). Success rate of orthograde endodontic retreatment after failed apicectomy–a retrospective study. International Endodontic Journal, 56(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13925
Azike, I. N., Okonkwo, E. A., Ezeh, M. A., Okonkwo, N. V., & Ikpenwa, C. E. (2023). Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support in the Relationship Between Work-Family Conflict and Work Engagement. ESUT JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 8(1). https://esutjss.com/index.php/ESUTJSS/article/view/159
BagusBerkah, S., & Yudianto, A. G. P. (2023). SATRIA DALEM'S SOCIAL CIRCLE. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 13(1), 01-09. https://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass/article/view/70
Çayak, S. (2021). The mediating role of organizational happiness in the relationship between work engagement and life satisfaction: A study on teachers. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(4), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.852454
Cortes-Denia, D., Lopez-Zafra, E., & Pulido-Martos, M. (2023). Physical and psychological health relations to engagement and vigor at work: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review. Current Psychology, 42(1), 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01450-y
Crump, R. K., Eusepi, S., Moench, E., & Preston, B. (2023). The term structure of expectations. In Handbook of Economic Expectations (pp. 507-540). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822927-9.00025-2
Ennida, K., & Allouani, S. (2023). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment of Teacher-Researchers through Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Literature Review. Social Sciences, 11, 164-184. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.113011
Gallo, F., Manzardo, A., Camana, D., Fedele, A., & Scipioni, A. (2023). Integration of a circular economy metric with life cycle assessment: methodological proposal of compared agri-food products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02130-0
Ghahramani Qajar, S., Mohammadi Moghadam, Y., & Jovari, B. (2017). A study of the role of human resource vigor in organizational decision-making (case study: scientific-research centers). Journal of Naja Human Resources, 80(5), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2021.26926.2723 [In Persian]
Ghita, I., Handra, C., Naghi, E., Gurzu, I., & Chirila, M. (2022). Vulnerability to Stress and Depression Risk Related to Occupational Exposure to Aluminum. Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine, 10, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.4236/odem.2022.104020
Hejazi, S. K., Mokhtari Baye Kolaei, M., Gorjiposhti, M., & Gilanipour, J. (2023). Designing a Systemic Model of Competency for Managers of the Iranian Ports and Maritime Organization. Journal of System Management, 9(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.30495/jsm.2023.1972925.1713 [In Persian]
Hossain, M. (2020). Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Organizational Commitment among Clinical Nurses in Bangladesh. Nursing, 10, 693-704. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2020.107049
Jovari, B. (2023). Organizational Vigor Creation Paradigm Model in Universities. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 10(6), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8217674
Jovari, B., & Mohammadi Moghadam, Y. (2021). Vigor and strategies for its implementation in universitie. Journal of New Educational Ideas, 17(1), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2021.26926.2723 [In Persian]
Jovari, B., Mohammadi Moghadam, Y., Gharamani Ghajar, S., & Moradi, H. (2020). The Organizational Barriers of Vigor-Creating in the University;Providing a Grounded Model (A Case Study of Alzahra University). Management in the Islamic university, 8(18), 329-350. http://miu.nahad.ir/article_728.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Kaloka, P. T., Yuliarto, H., & Wulandari, P. P. (2024). Validity and Reliability of a Nonlinear Pedagogy Assessment Test (GPAI) in Invasion Games 6th Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education and Sport Science (YISHPESS 2023), https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-356-6_12
Mohammadzadeh, Z., & Salehi, K. (2015). Pathology of Academic Vitality and Dynamism in Scientific and University Centers: A Study with a Phenomenological Approach. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Policies, 3(11), 1-25. [In Persian]
Omasu, F., Kawano, A., Nagayasu, M., & Nishi, A. (2022). Research on Lifestyle Habits Caused by Stress. Preventive Medicine, 12, 190-198. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2022.129014
Pan, J., & Yang, Z. (2023). Knowledge mapping of relative deprivation theory and its applicability in tourism research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01520-5
Pryce-Jones, J. (2011). Happiness at Work: Maximizing Your Psychological Capital for Success. Management Decision, 49(6), 1028-1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470666845
Qoreyshi Khorasgani, M. (2019). Guest editor: looking at the university from the perspective of entrepreneurship. Science and Technology Policy, 11(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00104-X
Rosafizah, M., Norhaini, M., & Khairuddin, I. (2020). Organizational Support-Citizenship Behavior Relationship in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions. CreativeEducation, 11, 2293-2304. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1111168
Sankaran, S., Sankaran, K., & Bui, T. (2023). Student satisfaction with R vs. Excel in Data Mining and Business Analytics: A Herzberg's motivation‐hygiene theory perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 21(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12285
Sepahvand, R., & Bagherzadeh Khodashahri, R. (2021). Strategic human resource management practices and employee retention: A study of the moderating role of job engagement. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 437-468. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2020.291391.673843 [In Persian]
Shah, P. N., Mishra, D. K., Falahat, P., Fischer, L., Guzman, G., Terheyden, J. H., & Wintergerst, M. W. (2023). Inter-Rater Reliability of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment on Wide-Field OCT-Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 12(7), 13. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.7.13
Sidhu, S. K., Ong, F. S., & Balaji, M. S. (2023). Impact of failure severity levels on satisfaction and behavior: from the perspectives of justice theory and regulatory focus theory. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(4), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2022-5412
Taherian, H., Faiz, D., & Heydarkhani, Z. (2013). Studying the Effective Managerial and Organizational Factors on the Happiness and Joy in the Universities and their Effects on the Knowledge Production. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education(72), 99-116. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702844_en.html?lang=fa [In Persian]
Warnabarana, T. D., & Randika, P. A. D. D. (2022). Influencing Factors of Employee Engagement on Financial Wellbeing: Special Reference to Bank of Ceylon, Matara District, Sri Lanka. Business and Management Research, 7(1), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.1.1274
Yaman, F., & Yaman, M. (2023). The Effect of Job Stress and Feeling of Entrapment on Perceived Task Performance and the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction in the Scope of Organizational Sustainability. Business and Management Research, 11, 11-30. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2023.111002
Yildiz, H. (2019). The Interactive Effect of Positive Psychological Capital and Organizational Trust on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. SAGE Open, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019862661
Yurdakul, G., & Arar, T. (2023). Revisiting Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Is it still universal content? Journal of human behavior in the social environment, 1103-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2177227