عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر روابط دموکراتیک در خانواده(مورد مطالعه: زنان متأهل شهر اندیمشک)

محورهای موضوعی : زن و جامعه

اسحق ارجمند سیاهپوش ¹ , داریوش رضاپور ²

1 - گروه روان شناسی، واحد اندیمشک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اندیمشک، ایران.
2 - عضو هیأت علمی گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/09/25 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/02/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/05/01

کلید واژه: خانواده, روابط دموکراتیک, جامعه‌پذیری جنسیتی, میزان تحصیلات, اندیمشک,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر روابط دموکراتیک در خانواده در بین زنان متأهل شهر اندیمشک است. روش پژوهش، پیمایشی و واحد تحلیل فرد پاسخگو و سطح تحلیل، خرد است. شیوه نمونه‌گیری، خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای است و حجم نمونه طبق فرمول کوکران 375 نفر می‌باشد. ابزار گردآوری داده‏ها، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته و تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که میزان روابط دموکراتیک در خانواده در پاسخگویان در حد نسبتاً پایینی است و میزان محسوسی از نابرابری نیز وجود دارد. بین متغیرهای میزان دینداری، میزان تحصیلات و جامعه پذیری جنسیتی با میزان روابط دموکراتیک رابطه مثبت و مستقیم وجود دارد. تحلیل رگرسیونی نشان می‌دهد که 1/58 درصد از تغییرات میزان روابط دموکراتیک به متغیرهای مستقل مربوط می‌شود و متغیرهای میزان دینداری و میزان تحصیلات زن تأثیر بیشتری در میزان روابط دموکراتیک دارند. همچنین متغیر کلیشه‌های جنسیتی کمترین اثر را بر میزان روابط دموکراتیک در خانواده داشته است. هرچه میزان دینداری و جامعه‌پذیری جنسیتی بیشتر باشد، باعث افزایش روابط دموکراتیک و برابری بیشتر قدرت تصمیم‌گیری در درون خانواده در ابعاد خانوادگی و اجتماعی می‌شود.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the social factors affecting democratic relations in the family among married women in Andimeshk city. The research method is survey and the unit of analysis is the respondent and the level of analysis is micro. The sampling method is multi-stage clusters and the sample size according to Cochran's formula is 375 people. Data collection tool is a researcher-made questionnaire and using SPSS software for data analysis. The results showed that the level of democratic relations in the family in the respondents is relatively low and there is a significant level of inequality. There is a positive and direct relationship between the variables of religiosity, education and gender socialization with the degree of democratic relations. Regression analysis shows that 58.1% of the changes in the degree of democratic relations are related to independent variables and the variables of the degree of religiosity and the level of female education have a greater impact on the degree of democratic relations. Also the variable of gender stereotypes had the least effect on the degree of democratic relations in the family. Increasing religiosity and gender socialization increase democratic relations and greater equality of decision-making power in the family and social dimensions.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Mehrabi Zadeh Honarmand M, Hosseinpour M, Mehdizadeh, L. The effectiveness of increasing life skills in enhancing marital adaptability of married women 20-40 years old. Training and Learning Studies. 2010;2(1):125- 39. https://www.sid.ir/paper/476084/fa


2. Sarukhani B. Woman, power and family: a research into the place of woman in the power pyramid of the family. Woman in Development & Politics. 2005;3(2):29-50. https://jwdp.ut.ac.ir/article_13245.html?lang=fa


3. Mahdavi MS, Saburi Khosrowshahi, H. Investigating power distribution structure in the family. Women Studies. 2003;1(2):29-67. https://jwsps.alzahra.ac.ir/article_1248.html


4. Saeedian F. Investigating the relationship between power structure in the family and marital conflicts: Tarbiat Moalem Unversity; 2003. https://www.sid.ir/paper/456113/fa


5. Ghanei Rad MA. The decline of patriarchy, the collapse of the family or the rise of the civil family. Tehran: Culture Criticism; 2017. https://www.adinehbook.com/gp/product/6008405250


6. Yazdi SM, Hosseini Abadi, F. The relationship between power structure in the family and women’s emotional intelligence. Youth Studies. 2008;12:157-70. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1455297


7. Zahiri H, Fathi S. Family management in the theories of sociology compared to Allameh Tabatabei’s theory. Research Letter of the Quran and Hadith. 2010;8: 99-120. https://www.sid.ir/paper/363408/fa


8. Zolfaghar M, Hosseinian S, Yazdi S.M. The investigation of the relationship between power structure in the family and marital satisfaction of working and house-working women in Tehran city. Counseling Research. 2004;3(21). https://www.sid.ir/paper/70166/fa


9. Nabavi S, Ahmadi L. Investigating the effect of social factors on symbolic gender inequality in the family (inequality in decision-making power). Iranian Journal of Sociology. 2007;8(2):57-75. https://www.sid.ir/paper/67429/fa


10. Sohrabzadeh M, Shoaa S, Movaheh M, Niazi M. The Relationship between Family Solidarity and Family Power Distribution Structure: Case Study of Married Women in Shiraz. Sociology of Social Institutions. 2020;6(14):261-85. https://www.sid.ir/paper/260889/fa


11. Zalizadeh M BM, Moltafet H. A Study of Family Factors Affecting Social Tolerance among Students of Ahvaz Shahid Chamran University. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2018;29(2):129-46. https://www.sid.ir/paper/154892/fa


12. Zarei Toopkhaneh M. Power structure in the family from Islam’s viewpoint compared to the theories of psychology and sociology. Special issue of National Symposium of Islamic style life2013. https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/articlepage/996020/text/


13. Hosseinian S, Karami, A, Amini, M. . Strategic ideas, woman and family online2011. https://www.olgou.ir/index.php/fa/ketab03


14. Koester D. Gender Power2015. www.dlprog.org.


15. Center. AHsN. Family Group Decision – Making Webinor Series. 2010. https://www.hunter.cuny.edu/socwork/nrcfcpp/downloads/tools/fgdm-tool.pdf


16. Mohd Nor L. Decision – Making Process. Group ESC Toulouse. 2010. http://proceedings.utwente.nl/59/1/MohdNor.pdf


17. Srinivasan K. Social Networks and Decision – Making: Women’s Participation in Household Decisions, . Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies. 20029. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/13767.html


18. Giddens A. The Third Way - the renewal of social democracy. Tehran: Shirazeh Publication; 20028. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1417536


19. Ritzer G. Contemporary sociological theory. Tehran: Elmi Publications; 2003. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1829452


20. Tavasoli G. Theories of sociology. Tehran: SAMT Publication; 2007. https://samta.samt.ac.ir/content/9091


21. Coltrane SL, Collins, R. . Sociology of marriage and the family. Edition t, editor. Howard: Publisher Eve; 2001. https://www.amazon.com/Sociology-Marriage-Family /dp/0534579604


22. Movahed M. EH, Gorgi A. The Impact OF Socio-economic Factors on women’s attitude towards gender inequality Woman in Development and Politics. 2005;3(2)::95-113. https://sid.ir/paper/55549/en


23. Khanali Zadeh. A sociological investigation into the structure and method of applying power in the family with an emphasis on gender: a case study of married men and women of Tehran city. tehran: tehran; 2010. https://noordoc.ir/thesis/38846


24. Falahi Gilan R. Investigating the effect of power distribution structure in the family on the political and social participation of the youth with an emphasis on the students of Sharif University of Technology. tehran: Department of Social Sciences. University of Tehran; 2011. https://noordoc.ir/author/85439


25. Ezazi S. Sociology of Family with emphasis on the role, structure and function of family in contemporary era. Tehran: Roshangaran and Women Studies Publication; 2003. https://www.adinehbook.com/gp/product/964551262X


26. Bostan Najafi H. Islam and the sociology of family. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University; 2009. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11084987


27. Navabakhsh M, Fathi S. Parenting methods and social adaptability of children. Religious Research. 2011;22:33-64. https://www.sid.ir/paper/90825/fa