دلالت‌های سیاستی مصرف در منظومه معنایی قرآن کریم مبتنی بر نظام خانواده

محورهای موضوعی : زن و جامعه

عباس ابراهیمی ¹ , سجاد نیکخو ² , عبدالعلی ابراهیمی ³

1 - استادیار پژوهشی،دبیرخانه شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی، تهران، ایران
2 - دکتری مدرسی معارف دانشگاه شیراز،شیراز،ایران
3 - .

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/01/31 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/03/02 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/04/01

کلید واژه: خانواده, سیاستگذاری مصرف, نظام معنایی قرآن, دلالت‌های سیاستی,

چکیده مقاله :

خانواده به عنوان مهمترین نهاد اجتماعی در اندیشه ونظام دینی دارای کارکردهای متعدد فرهنگی و تربیتی است. کارکردهای که متاثر از سیاست‌های حاکمیت و دولت سهم قابل توجهی را درساماندهی مصرف فردی و اجتماعی دارد. بررسی دلالت پژوهانه نظام معنای قرآن بیانگرتعلق ثروت به جامعه و کفالت عمومی اموال، رعایت شان، توجه به حد قوام، توجه به احکام دینی و تعیین سطح مناسبات مصرف خانواده بر مبنای عرف است. تبیین این گزاره‌ها و کشف وجوه افتراق مصرف خانواده در سبک زندگی از منظر قرآن و فرهنگ مصرف مدرن ما را به این نکته رهنمون می‌سازد که در منظومه فکری قرآن انسان موجودی با ابعاد مختلف روحی و جسمی است که برای تأمین نیازهای خود مصرف می‌کند. مصرف به‌‌خودی‌خود نکوهش نشده؛ ولی هدف غائی نیست؛ بلکه مقدمه‌ای برای رسیدن به هدف متعالی رشد و حیات طیبه است. لذاسامان هی این مقوله مهم نقش مهم واساسی درایجادوتعمیق وتوسعه سبک زندگی اسلامی ایرانی دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The family, as the most important social institution in religious thought and system, has various cultural and educational functions. Functions that are influenced by the policies of the government and the state have a significant share in the organization of individual and social consumption. A semantic study of the meaning system of the Qur'an indicates the affiliation of wealth to society and the general sponsorship of property, their observance, attention to consistency, attention to religious rules and determining the level of family consumption relations based on custom. Explaining these propositions and discovering the differences between family consumption in lifestyle from the perspective of the Qur'an and the culture of modern consumption leads us to the point that in the intellectual system of the Qur'an man is a creature with different mental and physical dimensions to meet his needs. It does. Consumption itself is not condemned, but it is not the ultimate goal; it is the prelude to achieving the sublime goal of good growth and life.

منابع و مأخذ:

- Danaei Fard, H. (2016). .Methodology of Research means Studies in the Social Sciences and Humanities Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches and Implementation Steps, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Social Sciences, Spring. PP 39-71

2- Bakak, R. (2002). Consumption, Translated by Khosro Sabri Dashti, Tehran, Shirazeh Research Publications. P 51

3- Keynes, J.M. (2005). The General Theory of Employment, Benefit, and Money, Translated by Manuchehr Farhang, Tehran, Institute of Economic Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran. P131

4- Marcel John, (1972). The principle of Economy, Translated by Houshang Nahavandi, Tehran, Higher Institute of Accounting. P 295

5- Tavanaeian Fard, H. (2006). Descriptive culture of economics, Tehran, Jahan Rayaneh Publications. PP 219-220

6- Jedari Aali, M. (2015). The Islamic Model for Consumption Ethics, Tehran, Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. P 45

7- Ghadiri Asl, B. (2000). The Generalities of Economics, Tehran, Sepehr Publications. P 274

8- Giddens, A. (2008). Modernity and individuality, society and personal identity in the new age, Tehran, Ney Publications. P120

9- Khademian, T. (2008). The Cultural Lifestyle, and Consumption, Tehran, Jahane Ketab Cultural Institution. PP 25-26

10- Boudiar, J. (2010). The consumer society of myths and structures, Translated by Pirouz Izadi, Tehran, Sales Publications.

11- Bakak, R. (2002). Consumption, Translated by Khosro Sanri Dashti, Tehran, Shirazeh Research Publications. P 100

12- Smith, Ph. D. (2005). An introduction to cultural theory, Translated by Hasan Pouyan, Tehran, International Center for the Dialogue of Civilizations, Office of Cultural Research. P 384

13- Boudiar, J. (2010). The consumer society of myths and structures, Translated by Pirouz Izadi, Tehran, Sales Publications. PP 85-86

14- Ghoroshi, S. A. A. (1992). Lexicon of Quran, 6^th Ed., Tehran, Islamic Library. Vol. 2 P 354

15- Ragheb Isfahani, H. B. M. (1995). Translation and research of the contents of Quranic words (Ragheb Isfahani), 4^th Ed., Vol. 2, Tehran, Mortazavi, Vol. 1 P  682

16- Mozaffar, M. R. (1986). The Logic, Translated by. P 40 Manouchehr Sanei Darreh Beidi, Qom, Hekmat Publications. P 40

17- Mohammadi, A. (2006). Explanation of the Kefayat AL- Usul, five volumes, published by Imam Al-Hassan Ibn Ali Publications Alifourth edition, Qom. Vol.1 P 58

18- Fazel Movahhedi, F., Lankarani, M. (2006). Clarification sufficiency, Vol. 6, 5^th Ed., Iran – Qom, Noah Publications. Vol. 1 P 79

19-  Mozaffar, M.R. (1986). The Logic, Translated by Manouchehr Sanei Darreh Beidi, Qom, Hekmat Publications. P 40

20- Ibn Babawayh, M. I. A. (1959). Ayoun Alakhbar Al-Reza (PBUH), Tehran, 1^st Ed. Vol. 2 P87

21- Tabatabaei, M. H. (1982). Almizan in Quran Interpretation, Beirut, Scientific Institute for Press. Vol.1 P 300

22- Tabarsi, F. B. H. (1993). Majma 'al-Bayan, Vol. 5, Tehran, Naser Khosro Publications. 3 P13

23- Balaghi, M. J. (1825). Alaa Al-Rahman in the interpretation of the Quran, Qom, Be’sat Institution. Vol.2 P 12

24- Tabatabaei, M. H. (1995). Translation of Almizan Interpretation, 5^th Ed., Qom, Qom Seminary Teachers Association, Islamic Publications Office. Vol.4 PP 270-271

25- Moti’e, M., Agha Dousti, E., and Nikzad Hosseini, F.S. (2017). Semantic components of the field of tradition in the Quran, Meshkat, Issue 36, Number 1, Consecutive Number 134, Spring. P 20

26- Ayyashi, M.B.M. ( 19?). Tafsir Al-Ayashi, Seyyed Hashem Rasouli Mahallati, Tehran, Islamic Scientific Library. Vol.2 P13

27- Kalini, M. B Y. (1987). Alkafi, 4^th Ed., Tehran, Islamic Publications. Vol.5 P 55

28- Ameli, Sh. H. (1994). Vesael al Shi’a, Qom, Al al Beit. Vol.21 P 560

29- Shaibani, A., and Karimi, A.A. (2015). A comparative study of the concept of dignity in the consumption pattern of a Muslim and the theory of demonstrative consumption, BiQuarterly Journal of Islamic Economics Studies, Number 14. P 148

30- Javadi Amoli, A. (2006). Tasnim, An Interpretation to Holy Quran, Vol. 9, Researched by Hasa Vaezi Mohammadi and Hossein Ashrafi, Edited by Hossein Shafiei, 1^st Ed., Qom, Asra Center. 9 P 587

31-  Mulla Sadra, M. I. I. (1982). al-arshiyah, Tehran, Mola Publications. P33

32- Mulla Sadra, M. I. I. (1989). Hikmat al-muta‘aliya fi-l-asfar al-‘aqliyya al-arba‘a, Qom, Publications Mustafawi Library. Vol.8 PP 136-137

33- Sadr, S. M. B. (1996). Out Economy, Qom, Islamic Information Office. PP 128-129

34- Tabatabaei, M. H. (1982). Almizan in Quran Interpretation, Beirut, Scientific Institute for Press. Vol.9 P144

35- Tabatabaei, M. H. (1995). Translation of Almizan Interpretation, 5^th Ed., Qom, Qom Seminary Teachers Association, Islamic Publications Office. Vol.16 PP 172-173

36- Sadr, S. M. B. (2016). Al-Ma'alim al-Jadidah  lil-Usul, Tehran Al-Najah Publications,. P 5

37- Jafari Langeroudi, M. J. (2004). An Introduction to Law Science, Tehran, Ganje Danesh Publications. PP 51-52

38- Jafari Langeroudi, M. J. (2008). Extensive in Law Terminology, Ganje Danesh Publications, Vol. 2. 2 P 2522

39- Jafari Langeroudi, M. J. (2009). The Law Encyclopedia, Tehran, Ganje Danesh Publications, Vol. 2, 2nd Ed. Vol.2 P 59

40- Kharrazi, S. M. (1995). Concerning the truth of custom and its types and principles, the role of time and place in the ijtihad of the collection of interviews of the Congress of Imam Khomeini's jurisprudential studies, 14^th Ed. P 155

41- Zargha, M. A. (1998). The general jurisprudence entrance, Damascus, Dar al Ghalam Publications. P 51

42- Hakim, S. M. T. (1998). General principles of comparative jurisprudence, Qom, The global complex for Ahl al-Bayt (PBUT). P 421