موانع و چشم‌اندازهای مشارکت سوژهی زنان در امر سیاسی ایران (نمونه مطالعاتی: دهمین دورهی انتخابات مجلس شورای اسلامی)
محورهای موضوعی : زن و جامعه
1 - گروه حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران- دانشگاه تهران.
2 - گروه حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات تهران- عضو هیئت علمی جهاد دانشگاهی.
کلید واژه: امر سیاسی, دموکراسی جدلی, سوژهی زنان, سوژ‌گی, کلیشه‌های جنسی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این مقاله، بررسی مشارکت سیاسی زنان، به منزله ی عاملیت یا سوژهی بسط دموکراسی در چهارچوب ساختار حاکم بر جامعه‌ی ایرانی است. بدین منظور، نگارندگان با استفاده از روش تحلیلی- توصیفی و نیز بهره گیری از نظریهی ساختارگرایی آلتوسر و نظریهی دموکراسی مجادله ای موفه، تحلیلی جامعه شناختی از مشارکت زنان در دهمین دورهی انتخابات مجلس شورای اسلامی ارائه دادند. یافته های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، عدم هم‌افزایی سطوح مختلف ساختارهای اقتصادی، ساختار سیاسی و فرهنگی موجود با تحولات ناشی از جهانی شدن و توانمندسازی زنان، موجب استمرار گفتمان مسلط مردسالاری و ضعف عاملیت زنان در امر سیاسی ایران شده است. در نهایت، از این تحقیق نتیجه گیری شد همانگونه که اساس نظریهی رادیکال دموکراسی موفه در مفصل‌بندی با اقتصاد لیبرال محقق می‌شود، برای ارتقای عاملیت زنان در حوزهی امر سیاسی و نیل به دموکراسی واقعی، میزانی از توسعهی اقتصادی با هدف کاهش آثار اتکای بر منابع رانتیر ضروری است.
We attempt to examine the political participation of women, as the agency or subject in the expansion of democracy, within the framework of the ruling structure in the Iranian community. We use descriptive analytical method and Agonistic Democracy Theory's Mouffe and Structuralism Theory's Althusser to present sociological analysis of women's political participation on the 10 Th parlimentary election in Iran. Along these lines, we used Althusser's theory to explain obstacles for the emergence and formation of female subject. Therefore, we used structuralism theory and attempted to explain the role of economic structure and then political and cultural structure on the continuation or naturalization patriarchy discourse and the denial of female subject. Mouffe referred to polemical democracy in articulation with Liberal economy. It was concluded that polemical democracy has no relationship on articulation with rentier states. To achieve real democracy, economic development is undeniable and necessity to change the economic nature and structure of these communities.
- Abediardakani M & Ghazavi Z. (2014). Social Capital and Political Participation. Political-Economic Informations. No.298. (Persian)
- Abasnia A & Mosafa N. (2011). Women's participation in the I.R.I. Women Research. Vol. 5, No.1. (Persian)
- Abdollahi M. (2004). Women and Civil Institues. Sociology of Iran. Vol.5, No.2. (Persian)
- Agbalajobi D.T. (2010). Women’s Participation and the Political Process in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations. Vol. 4, No.2.
- Akochian A & Arabnejad M. (2010). The Religious Principles of Women Participation on the Political Development. Women Strategic Studies. Vol.13, No.2.
- Bashirieh H. (2009). Political Sociology. Tehran: Ney publication. (Persian)
- Betis D & Fered P. (1999). Cultural Anthropology. Translated by Mohsen Salasi. Tehran: Elmi publication. (Persian)
- Cohen J. (1996). Procedure & Substance in Deliberative Democracy. in Democracy & Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. ed. By Benhabib. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
- Delys S. (2014). Women and Political Representation. Handbook on Increasing Women’s Political Participation in Georgia. Tbilisi.
- Ferreter L. (2006). Louis Althusser. New York: Routledge.
- Glaeser E. (2001). The Formation of Social Capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research. Vol.2, No.1.
- Habermas J. (1989). The Structural of Transformation of the Public Sphere. Translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge: polity press.
- Hashemi A. (2015). Effects Social Factors on the Women Participation. Women and society. Vol.6, No.1. (Persian)
- Huspek M. (2007). Symposium: Habermas and Deliberative Democracy: Introductory Remarks. Communication Theory. No. 17.
- Imamjomezadeh J & Marandi Z. (2012). The Study of Relationship Between Social Capital and Political Participatioin of students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Political knowledge. Vol.1, No.1. (Persian)
- Jonathan Di J. (2010). The Resource Curse: Theory and Evidence. Real Institute Elcano, 15.12. 2010.
- Khajenoori B & Moghadas A. (2007). Globalization and Political Participation of Women in Iran. Social science quarterly. No.52. (Persian)
- Lipset S.M. (1998). Political Man. New York: Free Press.
- Motaghi E & Roshanaei A. (2011). The Role of the State in the Development and limitation of the Discourses of Contemporary Women's Civil Right. Social Development Studies of Iran. Vol.4, No.1. (Persian)
- Movahed M. (2003). Political Participation and Social Factors. Women Studies. Vol.1, No.3. (Persian)
- Mouffe C. (1999). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism, Social Research. Vol.66, No. 3.
- Movahed M, Enayat H & Purnemat A. (2008). Study of Relation Between Social Capital and Political Participation. Human and Social Science. (Persian)
- Mousavi M, Vadadhir A & Barzegar N. (2010). Human Development in the Gender and Education’s Women. Women in Development and Politics. Vol.8, No.4. (Persian)
- Najirad M.A. (2003). Obstacles of Women Political Participation in I.R.I. Tehran: Kavir Publication. (Persian)
- Panahi M & Bani Fatemeh S. (2016). Political Culture and Women's Political Participation. Social Science. No.68. (Persian)
- Pirahmadi M. (2012). The Curse of Reources, Democracy and it’s Rol in Economic Growth. M.A thesis, unpublished.University of Tehran . (Persian)
- Pishgahifard Z & Zohdigoharpur M. (2010). The Status and Role of Women on the Political Participation in Middle East. Women and Society. Vol.1 , No.1. (Persian)
- Pishgahifard Z & Zohdigoharpur M & Abedinirad A. (2015). The Functions of Gender Empowerment in the Development of Women's Political Participation. Central Eurasia Studies. Vol.7, No.2. (Persian)
- Rabiee A. (2007). The Riddle of the State in the Third World. Tehran: Research and Development human science institue. (Persian)
- Rancière J. (1995) .Politics, Identification and Subjectivization. in The Identity in Question, ed.John Rajchman. NewYork: Routledge.
- Rancière J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
- Poulantzas N. (1974). Political Power and Social Classes. London: Verso.
- Rancière J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Razavialhashem B. (2009). Analysis of the Status of Women's Participation in the Process of Social- Political Development of I.R.I. Social Science Monthy Journal. No.21. (Persian)
- Renzentti, C. M. & Curran, D. J. (1989). Women, Men, and Society: The Sociology of Gender. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Samadirad A. (2006). Mechanisms of Promoting Women's Participation in Political and Economic Dimensions. Social Welfare. Vol.5, No.21. (Persian)
- Sedighi B & Ameri P. (2017). The role of Women's Political Participation in the Sustainable Development Process. Social Research. Vol.8, No.38. (Persian)
- Shvedova N. (2005). Obstacles to Women’s Participation in Parliament. in Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers. edited by Julie Ballington and Azza Karam. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
- Stevens C. )2010). Are Women the Key to Sustainable Development?. Sustainable Development Insights. 003, April .
- Tavana M & Azarkamand F. (2014). Comparison of The Political and the Favorable Political Society in Habermas and Moffe’s Thoughts, Political Study. Vol.5, NO.4. (Persian)
- Tourine A. (1985). An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements. Social Research. No.52.
- World Survey on the Role of Women in Development. (2014). Gender Equality and Sustainable Development. UN Women. in
- http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital_library/publications/2014/10/world-survey-2014
_||_