بررسی میزان سازگاری کشاورزان حوزه دریاچه ارومیه با خشکسالی (مورد: دهستان بکشلوچای شهر ارومیه)
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای
علی اکبر تقیلو
1
(دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران)
ساجد بهرامی جاف
2
(دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران)
فریده علیزاده
3
(دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی آمایش سرزمین، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران)
محبوبه شهبازی
4
(دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی آمایش سرزمین، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران)
کلید واژه: خشکسالی, دریاچه ارومیه, ارومیه, سازگاری, دهستان بکشلوچای,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی میزان سازگاری کشاورزان روستاهای دهستان بکشلوچای ارومیه میباشد زیرا تغییرات اقلیمی در بسیاری از نقاط جهان آثار خود را در دهههای اخیر بر جای گذاشته است و انتظار میرود تاثیر این تغییرات در دهههای آینده تشدید شود. در این بین معیشت در جوامع وابسته به کشاورزی به شدت تحت تأثیر آب و هوا بوده و آسیب پذیری بیشتری را تجربه مینمایند. به همین دلیل شناسایی مراحل پاسخ و واکنش آنها اهمیت زیادی دارد. با توجه به تاثیر منفی این تغییرات بر تولید بخش کشاورزی، و از طرفی دیگر به دلیل اینکه تولید محصولات کشاورزی منبع درآمد بسیاری از جوامع روستایی میباشد، لذا سازگاری جوامع روستایی (مخصوصا کشاورزان) برای حفظ معیشت و اطمینان از امنیت غذایی خود امری کاملا ضروری است. روش مورد استفاده تحلیل و توصیفی و روش جمع آوری اطلاعات نیز روش پیمایشی و اسنادی بوده است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات از آزمونهای آماریT تک نمونهای، آزمون کرونباخ، آزمون تحلیل عامل تاییدی و رگرسیون استفاده شده است، نتایج حاصل شده از آزمون کرونباخ نشان دهنده 0.731 بود. نتایج آزمون T نشان از پایین بودن میزان سازگاری کشاورزان به میزان 2.67 است و در بین مولفههای طرح شده مولفه دانش و اطلاعات نوین با امتیاز میانگین 3.19 اهمیت بیشتری داشته است. نتایج آزمون رگرسیون بیانگر تاثیر زیاد دانش و اطلاعات نوین و تغییر و تحول با سطح سازگاری کشاورزان به ترتیب با میزان 0.62 و 0.4 بوده است. نتایج تحلیل عاملی تاییدی بیانگر اهمیت مولفه دانش نوین بود،و در میان گویههای دانش نوین، میزان دانش در رابطه با روشهای نوین کاشت با امتیاز 0.9 و میزان دانش در ارتباط با روش های نوین برداشت با امتیاز 0.883 بیشترین تاثیر را داشتهاند.
Climate change has left its work in many parts of the world in recent decades, and it is expected that the impact of these changes will intensify in the coming decades. Meanwhile, livelihoods in agricultural communities are heavily influenced by weather and experience more vulnerability. For this reason, it is important to identify the response steps and reactions. Given the negative impact of these changes on agricultural production, and on the other hand, because agricultural production is the source of income for many rural communities, adaptation of rural communities (especially farmers) to maintain livelihoods and ensure their food security is an issue Absolutely necessary. The purpose of this study was to investigate the compatibility of farmers in the villages of Baskeholuchai village of Urmia. The method used was analytical and descriptive and data gathering method was survey and documentary. Data were analyzed using one-sample T-test, Cronbach's test, Bartlett's test, and regression. The results of Cronbach's test were 0.731 which had a high level of stability. The T-test showed The low level of farmers' compatibility is 2.67. Also, the results of regression test showed the great impact of new knowledge and information on the level of farmers' compatibility.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Climate change and its impact on surface water flows and groundwater resources along with inadequate management of water resources have increased the vulnerability of communities to these changes and, undoubtedly, exacerbated water crises have further increased the damage. It will become acceptable. Meanwhile, livelihoods in rural communities are heavily influenced by climate, with other socio-economic factors and political, cultural conditions also affecting the farmer's performance and ability to produce and profit. For this reason, it is important to identify the stages of response and response. Adaptation means harmonizing economic, social, environmental conditions with the consequences of climate change. The system's adaptability, capacity or potential to adapt to climate change.Agriculture can survive when the farmer recognizes beneficial adaptation strategies and applies them in the face of climate change, requiring that the farmer pay attention to climate change. Therefore, adaptation to climate change is a prerequisite for sustainable development and poverty reduction and must be taken into account in management processes .The purpose of this study was to investigate the adaptation capacity of farmers to drought in order to sustain their livelihoods. The main research question is what are the main factors affecting farmers' adaptability. And the research hypothesis is: New farmers' knowledge seems to be very important in the degree of adaptation of farmers.
Methodology
The present study is quantitative in nature and applied in purpose. The research method is descriptive-correlational in terms of data acquisition and data processing. According to the scope of the research, the research carried out has a cross-sectional use. In this study, library and field methods were used as a questionnaire to obtain the required information and data collection. The researcher-made questionnaire consisted of two sections. In the first part, the individual and professional characteristics of the respondents were questioned. The second part was related to the research variables. The statistical population of this study consisted of village farmers (Yuvalar, Keshtiban, Qeshlaq Mirza Ali and Mohammad Gholi, Isaikan, Igdir, Balderloo) who were the closest villages to Lake Urmia in Bekshluchai village. Cochran's formula was used to determine the sample size. According to the size of the statistical population (total number of household heads 1029), the sample size was 280.
Results and discussion
As shown in Table 4, the average compatibility is 2.67 overall. The results of the single sample T test show that the level of compatibility of farmers is lower than the theoretical average value of 3, which means that farmers are not well adapted to drought and drought in Urmia Lake. Among the components designed to assess farmers 'compatibility, the only component of modern knowledge was higher than the theoretical average of the statistical test, and the impact of this component on farmers' compatibility was greater due to the increased level of awareness of farmers and their families to Knowledge and knowledge of different aspects of agriculture. The rest of the research components had no effect on the level of adaptation of farmers in the studied villages.
In general, among the items related to farmers' adaptation, the most recent knowledge about the new harvesting and planting methods were 0.901 and 0.883, respectively, which were the most effective strategies to increase drought adaptation. Farmers' burden options and non-agricultural income had the least impact on compliance, with -0.501 and 0.503, respectively. After the Matrix 2, the use of agricultural technologies and access to financial credit were unprofessional, which means that they do not have an impact on the rate of farmers in the study area. Sub-criteria that have a high score in each criterion can be used as practical strategies to increase the degree of adaptability of farmers in the study area.
According to the output of linear regression analysis of access to services and credits with (0.168), participation with (0.315), new knowledge and information with (0.621), indigenous knowledge with (0.284) and component of transformation with (0.405) as Factors affecting adjustment were identified which can be used in the calculation of regression. In general, based on the results of linear regression based on the level of significance and standard beta coefficient, the new knowledge and information variable had the most relationship with the adaptation of drought farmers, ie, with increasing and decreasing level of new knowledge and information in drought. Among the farmers in the study area, the degree of compatibility of the farmers will also change. Then the transformation variable is in the second place of impact on adaptation, the participation variable is in third place of impact on adaptation. The variable of access to services and credits also had the least effect on drought adaptation of farmers in the study villages based on regression model.
Conclusion
The results of T-test and linear regression showed that the new knowledge and information variable in the study area was more effective than the rest of the research findings. The results of T-test indicated the effect of access to services and credits component on farmers' compliance rate. Financial and extension services are one of the factors affecting adaptability, access to credit, such as lending to farmers, is increasingly effective in drought compliance and access to credit and lending enables farmers. Perform numerous drought adaptation activities India. Participation or Membership in Social Entities Another Factor Affecting Farmers' Adaptation Capacity Researchers believe that individuals who are members of these institutions can interact with each other and gain experience in helping each other in times of drought and other climate disasters. The dominant agricultural activity in the rural areas of Lake Urmia has a deep relationship with the environment and water resources, which has caused this population to be affected more than other parts of the problem. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the adaptation of drought farmers in Urmia Lake, considering that the conditions that have the greatest impact on the agriculture and the economy of the region, as well as the migration of its population and the relative disruption of the market and its related problems. We have come up with solutions to prevent problems and adapt to the situation. It can be concluded that the research hypothesis that modern farmers 'knowledge seems to be of great importance to the extent of farmers' adaptability. Confirmed.
1- Adger, W.N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D. & Hulme, M., 2003, Adaptation to Climate Change in the Developing World, Progress in development studies, 3(3), P. 179-195.
2- Asante, S.K., (2011), Empowering Farming Communities in Northern Ghana with Strategic Innovations and Productive Resources in Dry Land Farming, Project Number 6, CPWF Project Report, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute.
3- Azizi, Amir and Saeedi, Shabanali and Alambeigi, Hossein Amir and Pourassef, Fereshteh (2016); Analysis of the role of livestock value in resilience of ranchers response to drought; (Study Area: Kamijan County); Second National Congress of Irrigation and Drainage.
4- Barak B. 2006. Consideration for the impact of climate change information on stated preferences. Ph.
5- Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27(12):2021-2044.
6- Bryan, E., Ringler, C., Okoba, B., Roncoli, C., Silvestri, S., & Herrero, M. 2011. Adapting agriculture to climate change in Kenya: Household and community strategies and determinants. In International Conference on May, 18.
7- Campbell, D., Barker, D. & McGregor, D., 2011, Dealing with Drought: Small farmers and environmental hazards in Southern St. Elizabeth, Jamaica, Applied Geography, Vol. 31, issue 1, PP. 146-158.
8- Ebi, K.L., Lim, B. & Aguilar, Y., 2005, Scoping and Designing an Adaptation Process, Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York, PP. 33- 46.
9- Esmaeil Nejad, M and Pudineh, MR (2017); Assessment of climate change adaptation in rural areas of South of South Khorasan; Journal of Natural Environment, 6th year, No 11.
10- Fatahi, E and Keshavarz, M R and Vazifeh Doost, M and Bahyar, Mohammad Bagher (2012); Regional Calibration of Experimental Coefficients Governing the Palmer Drought Intensity Index; Climatic Research, No. 12, pp. 89-99.
11- Feleke, FB. Berhe,M., Gebru, G., Hoag D. (2016). Determinants of adaptation choices to climate change by sheep and goat farmers in Northern Ethiopia: the case of Southern and Central Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of SpringerPlus. (2016) 5:1692
12- Ghamber Ali, R, Popzan, A and Afsharzadeh, N (2012); Reviewing Farmers' Viewpoint on Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies (Case Study: Kermanshah County); Rural Researches, Vol. 3, No. 11.
13- Ghanbari, Yousef and Arianfar, Wajieh and Mahouraie, Zeinab (2018); Structural Equation Modeling of the Impact of Agricultural Status on Pre-Post and Post-Drought Utilization System on Rural Population Sustainability (Case Study: Fasa City); Geography and Development, No. 50, pp. 143-160.
14- Heidari Sarban, V and Majnouni, T. Khomeini, A (2016); The Role of Livelihoods in Reserving Rural Households around Lake Urmia Against Drought; Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, Third Year, No. 4.
15- Ifeanyi-obi C.C., Etuk U.R. & Jike-wai O., 2012, Climate Change, Effects and Adaptation Strategies; Implication for Agricultural Extension System in Nigeria, Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, ISSN: 2276-7770, 2 (2), PP. 053-060.
16- Jamshidi, A and Nouri Zaman Abadi, H and Ebrahimi, M (2015); Farmers' adaptability to climate change in Sirvan, Ilam province: adaptation effects and options; Journal of Rural Research and Planning, Year 4, Issue 2.
17- Kazemi Sani Ata-Allah, N (2015) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Coping Strategies against Drought ; Journal of Crisis Prevention and Management, Vol. 5, No 2.
18- Khaledi, F and Zar Afshani, K and Mirkzadeh, A and Sharafi, L (2015); Effective Factors on Farm Capacity Consistency against Climate Change in Sarpol-e Zahab County, Kermanshah Province; Journal of Rural Studies, Period Sixth, No. 3.
19- Khatibi, Seyedeh Atiyeh and Golkarian, Ali and Masoodi, Abolfazl and Sajasi Gheidari, Hamdollah (2016); Qualitative Evaluation of Watershed Management Measures and Drought Impacts on Rural Habitat (Case Study: Mahvid Watershed); National Conference on Agriculture and Natural Resources.
20- Kheyrolahi, M and Ali Beigi, A and Zarafshani,K (2016) Investigating the Wheat Farmers' Vulnerability in Working Against Greenhouse Using Fuzzy Logic Case Study: Dehloran County, Rural Researches, Volume 7, Number 1.
21- KhosraviPour, B and Mohammadzadeh, S and Monfared, N and Khosravi, O and Solaimanpour, M (2013); Determining the factors affecting farmers' behaviors against the groundwater crisis; Journal of Research Rural Villages, Year 4, No. 1.
22- Maponya, Ph., & Mpandeli, S. (2012). Climate Change and Agricultural Production in South Africa: Impacts and Adaptation options. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(10), 48-60.
23- Mc Carthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J. & White, K.S. (Eds.),
2001, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, PP. 877–912.
24- Mirlotfi, M and Mohammadzai Rad, T (2015) ; The Study of the Role of Crisis Management in Sustainable Rural Development in Sistan Area; National Conference on Civil and Architectural Approaches to Sustainable Development.
25- Moredsadat, P and R. Eftekhare. A(2018); Strategic analysis of sustainable agricultural development with entrepreneurial approach (Case Study: Khozestan Province); Regional Planning Quarterly, Year 8, serial number 30. PP 31-50.
26- Najafi Kani, A.K, and Sahneh. B. and Akhlaghi, M (2018); The role of managing the risk management of agricultural activities in improving the economic indices of households. Case Study: gorgan city; Regional Planning Quarterly, Year 8, serial number 31. PP 61-76.
27- Narasimhan, B. and R. Srinivasan, (2005). Development and Evaluation of Soil Moisture DeficitIndex (SMDI) and vapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for Agricultural Drought Monitoring.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 133:69-88.
28- Ndamani, F., Watanabe, T. (2016). Determinants of farmers’ adaptation to climate change: A micro level analysis in Ghana. Journal of Scientia Agricola. Vol .73 no .3 Piracic aba May 2016
29- Palmer, W.C. 1965. Meteorological drought. Research. Paper No. 45, U.S. Department of Commerce Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C. 58p
30- Pour Taheri, M and Roknaddin Eftekhari, A (2016); Level and degree of drought-induced vulnerability in rural areas; Journal of Human Geography Researches, Vol. 48, No. 1.
31- Pourtahari, Mehdi, and Eftekhari, Abdolreckarnaddin and Kazemi, Nasrin (2013); The Role of Drought Risk Management Approach in Reducing Economic, Social Vulnerability of Rural Farmers; Journal of Rural Research, Fourth Year, No. 1, pp. 22–2.
32- Rezaei, R (2016) A look at the impact and status of climate change in the international human rights system; Two issues of environmental law, first year, issue 1.
33- Salehi, S and Pazokinejad, Z (2016); Analysis Socio-cultural factors affecting farmers' tendency towards sustainable agriculture. Peoples and Rural Planning Magazine, Vol 5, No 1.
34- Soleimani, A. and Afrakhteh, H and Azizpour, Fand Tahmasebi, A (2016); Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, Third Year, No 2.
35- Stakhiv, E. and Stewart, B.: Needs for Climate Information in Support of Decision-Making in the Water Sector world Climate Conference – 3, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 1, 102–119, doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.008, 2010
36- Suarez, P. (2005) Decision making for reducing vulnerability given new climate predictions: Case studies from metro Boston and rural Zimbabwe. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University, United States Massachusetts. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3171199)
37- Sujakhu, NM,. Ranjitkar, S,. Niraula. RR,. Pokharel, BK. (2016). Farmers' Perceptions of and Adaptations to Changing Climate in the Melamchi Valley of Nepal. Journal of Mountain Research and Development. Feb 2016 / pg(s) 15-30.
38- The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries ExperiencingSerious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa (UNCCD), 2009
39- Wilhite, D.A., and Glantz, M.H. 1985. Understanding the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water International. 10:111-120.
40- Akbarian Ronezi, S (2018); Analysis of Agricultural Sustainability and its Factors in Rural Areas Case: Roniz village - Estahban County; Year 8, serial number 31. PP 181-190.
_||_