تحلیل عملکرد دهیاری‌ها در فرایند توسعه اقتصادی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی مورد: بخش بادرود- شهرستان نطنز

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

حیدر لطفی ¹ (استادیار گروه جغرافیا، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، گرمسار، ایران)
سعید صالحیان بادی ² (دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران)
حمیدرضا قاسمی بادی ³ (کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/06/15 تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/05/25 تاریخ انتشار : 1395/05/01

کلید واژه: روستا, توسعه اقتصادی, دهیاری, بخش بادرود,

چکیده مقاله :

      یکی از محورهای اساسی در تحلیل مسائل روستایی، توجه به ساختار مدیریت در این جوامع است. روستاها به ‌منزلۀ مکان­هایی خاص با شیوه زندگی متفاوت نسبت به شهرها نیازمند الگوی مدیریتی مجزا و منطبق با شرایط اقتصادی، اجتماعی و بوم‌شناختی حاکم بر روستا هستند. دهیاری‌ها نهادهای عمومی و غیردولتی هستند که طی چند سال اخیر به­ منظور اداره امور عمومی روستاها در عرصه نظام مدیریت روستایی کشور مطرح شده­اند. پژوهش حاضر که به شیوه توصیفی- تحلیلی و پیمایش انجام شده، به بررسی تحلیل عملکرد دهیاری‌ها در فرایند توسعه اقتصادی روستاهای بخش بادرود در شهرستان نطنز استان اصفهان پرداخته است. تعداد خانوارهای ساکن در 6 روستای بخش بادرود 1407 نفر بوده که 262 نفر به عنوان حجم نمونه برگزیده شده­اند. تحلیل اطلاعات پرسشنامه نیز با آزمون ویلکاکسون صورت پذیرفته است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از این است که بین دهیاری و توسعه اقتصادی روستا رابطه معناداری وجود داشته و دهیاری‌ها نقش مثبتی در توسعه اقتصادی روستاها ایفا کرده‌اند. همچنین دهیاری‌ها از نظر اقتصادی نقش چندانی در ایجاد زمینه برای تشکیل کارگاه‌های تولیدی در روستا نداشته‌اند، اما تأثیر مثبتی در بازاریابی محصولات کشاورزی و سنددار شدن املاک روستاییان داشته‌اند. داده‌های میدانی این تحقیق در سال 1389 گردآوری شده که در سال 1394 بازنگری و به‌روز شده و صحت آن به تأیید دوباره رسیده است.  

چکیده انگلیسی:

One of the basic aspects in the analysis of rural problems is paying attention to management structure in these communities. Villages as especial places with different lifestyles than cities, require different management model which is consistent with the economic, social and ecological circumstances of the villages. The main target group of development plans is people living in villages.So, their satisfaction with managers and governors should be considered as one of the most important issues in preparing those plans. The village management offices are public and private institutions which have been established for the management of public affairs in the field of rural management system in villages. Since the previous governors were not successful in the achieving development, achieving this goal is the outmost importance in developing villages. This descriptive- analytical study focuses on economic development in rural area of Badrood in the Natanz County of the Isfahan Province. The number of households in six villages of Badrod is 1407 that 262 people were selected as sample size. Data analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon test. The research results indicate that there is a significant relationship between the village management offices and rural economic development. So, village management has played positiuve role in rural economic development. Data analysis has been done by "SPSS" software,"Wilcoxon signed-rank test" and "t-test". Also villages' managers have not had any role in establishment of productive workshop but it has positive impact on agricultural marketing and property ofvillagers. The field study data were gathered in the year 1389 that have been updated and revised in the year 1394. The updated data confirm the previous research results

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Ashraf zadeh, Hasan Reza (2009): Review and assessment of Factors affecting the performance of local management in rural areas, Case Study: villages' managers in Khaf town, MA thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian)


2. Imani jajrami, Hosein & Majid Abdollahy (2009): study of changes in rural management in Iran from constitutional up to the present, strategy magazine, 18, No. 52, pp. 18-25. (in Persian)


3. Badri, Seyyed Ali (2007): Interactive role of Islamic Rural Councils, village administrators and people in sustainable rural development, Dhyary‌Ha Magazine, number 21, p p. 25-18. (in Persian)


4. Papal Yazdi, Mohammad & Hossein Rajabi Snajrdy (2003) Theories of the city and periphery, the Samt publisher, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)


5. Taghdisi, Ahmad. et al (2011); Assess and analyze the level of village managers performance in rurals management, case study: Conany district in Kohdasht town, Journal of Urban Management, Tehran, pp. 174-157. (in Persian)


6. Chambers, Robert (1997): Rural Development, priority to the poor, translation Mustafa Azkia, Publishing Tehran University, Tehran. (in Persian)


7. Chvbchyan, Shahla., et al (2007): Factors affecting the performance of RMs Gilan province. Journal of Rural Development, Year 10, No. 2, pp. 108-87.


8. Hasan Alian, Davood. (1988): geomorphology of Karkas in Natanz, supervisor: Servati, MA Thesis, University of Shahid Beheshti, Department of Physical Geography. Tehran. (in Persian)


9. Rezaeian, Ali (2001): Principles of Management, the Samt publisher, Second Edition, Tehran. (in Persian)


10. Rezvani, Mohammad Reza, Somayeh Mohammadi and Sedigheh Piri (2013): Village management performance evaluation using Generel Evaluation Framework (CAF) (Case Study: Dehloran town), Studies Human Geography, Volume 45, No. 1, pp. 216 -199. (in Persian)


11. Sheikhi, Hojjat, Taher Parizadi and Bijan Varmarzyar (2013): review and evaluation of villages managers in the process of rural management and development (case study: the Hamedan town), spatial planning (Geography), Volume 3, row 10, pp. 32 -17.


12. Salehian Badi, Saeid (2013): Analysis of Geographical Naming of Emamzadeh District (Badrod), National Conference of Geographic Names, Tehran.


13. Salehian Badi, Saeid & Mohammad Rahgoshay (2013): the role of Desert ecotourism in the development of rural settlements (Case Study: Matin Abad tourist Camp in Badrod), National Conference on Geography and rural planning, Mashhad, pp. 1910-1901.


14. Salehian Badi, Saeid (2013): Transformation in the methods of exploitation of water resources and its roles in the development of rural agricultural economy Badrod (Natanz), Supervisor: Zia Tavana & Monshi Zadeh, Master thesis geography and rural planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. (in Persian)


15. Fal Soleiman, Mahmood et al., (2014): Review and evaluation of village Managers in the process of Rural Management and Development (Case study: the central District of Birjand), Research and rural planning, Tehran, pp. 95-73. (in Persian)


16. Ghadiri Masoum, Mojtaba & Mohammad Riahi (2004): Checking axes and challenges of rural management in Iran, Geographical Research Quarterly, No. 50, pp. 198-177. (in Persian)


17. Ghanbari, Yousef et al., (2014): Analysis of performance of Village Managers in the cultural, economic and Construction development of villages, Case study: Meymand District of Firooz-Abad Town, Conference on rural development and agriculture with emphasis on national production, the PNU of Piranshahr. (in Persian)


18. Lashni Parsa, rohollah, (2006): Evaluate the effectiveness of the performance of Village Management in Boroujerd, MA thesis in management graduate. Tehran University, Tehran.


19. Statistical Center of Iran, villages Profile Natanz town, 1996-2006. (in Persian)


20. Statistical Center of Iran, villages Profile Natanz town, 1966-1986. (in Persian)


21. Department of Village Management- Office of Planning (2004): A collection of rules and regulations of Village-Management, Press 1, Organization of Municipal and village management, Tehtan.


22. Mahdavi, Masoud & Najafi Kani (2005): Village-Management, experience in managing of Iranian villages, Geographical Research Quarterly, No. 53, Tehran, pp. 39-21. (in Persian)


23. Nemati, Morteza & seyyed Ali Badri (2007): Evaluation of The role of modern management system in rural, Comparative Village-Management in the great and small villages of Golestan, geographical research journal, Issue 59, pp. 176-161. (in Persian)