تحلیلی بر رابطه ی پراکنش توزیع خدمات اساسی و شاخص های جمعیتی با تأکید بر نظریه عدالت فضایی (مورد: شهرستان های استان خراسان رضوی)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

لیدا علیزاده ¹ , حمید شایان ²

1 - دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران
2 - استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/08/05 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/07/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1398/11/01

کلید واژه: عدالت فضایی, استان خراسان رضوی, پراکنش جمعیت, توزیع خدمات, نابرابری منطقه ای,

چکیده مقاله :

ا
    امروزه یکی از موضوعات مهم در برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای، مسئله توسعه متعادل و متناسب خدمات اساسی متناسب با پراکنش جمعیت آن منطقه می­باشد. چرا که ﻋﺪم ﺗﻮزﻳﻊ خدمات مذبور ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ اﻳﺠﺎد بحران های جمعیتی، اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ و ﻣﺸﻜﻼت ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪة ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ در راستای ﺗﻮزﻳـﻊ ﻋﺎدﻻﻧـﻪ و ﺗﻮﺳﻌﺔ ﻣﺘﻮازن ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ. هدف از این پژوهش، سنجش سطح خدمات زیر ساختی شهری- روستایی و رابطه آن با پراکنش جمعیتی در استان خراسان رضوی می باشد. این پژوهش دارای ماهیتی توصیفی- تحلیلی بوده که جهت گردآوری داده­ها از مطالعات اسنادی و میدانی و برای تحلیل داده­های خام و پهنه­بندی شهرستان­های استان خراسان رضوی از مدل­های تصمیم­گیری چندمعیاره و نرم­افزار GIS استفاده شد. در این رابطه، یافته­های حاصل از مدل ویکور و مدل سلسله مراتب فازی در سطح شهرستان­های استان بیانگر عدم توزیع متعادل خدمات می­باشد. شهرستان مشهد در بالاترین سطح از برخورداری و شهرستان­های سبزوار و نیشابور در حد متوسط و شهرستان­های خلیل­آباد و جوین در سطح نامطلوب قرارگرفته­اند. با توجه به اینکه شهر مشهد اولین شهر زیارتی ایران بوده به عنوان بزرگ­ترین کانون جذب جمعیتی در این استان می­باشد در وهله اول به نظر می­رسد این خدمات در سطح استانی در مقایسه با سایر مراکز جمعیتی متعادل نباشد و لذا این تحقیق دنبال این می­باشد که چه راهکارهایی با توجه به شرایط محلی و منطقه ای که عملی و قابل اجرا باشد می توان ارائه داد که این مراکز جمعیتی به سمت نقطه تعادلی  کشیده شود. در ادامه، جهت بررسی ارتباط بین شاخص های جمعیتی با وضعیت برخورداری شهرستان ها به لحاظ خدمات شهری از آزمون پیرسون استفاده شد. نتایج این آزمون نشان داد؛ بین تراکم جمعیت و نرخ رشد جمعیت با تمرکز خدمات، به ترتیب با ضریب (0.721)و (0.076) رابطه مستقیمی وجود دارد، از سوی دیگر، فاصله از مرکز استان با سطح برخورداری از خدمات اساسی با ضریب (0.113) رابطه چندان معنی­داری ندارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

          Today, one of the important issues in regional planning, The issue of balanced and proportionate development of basic services is proportional to the distribution of the population of that region. Because non-distribution of services will lead to demographic, social and complex spatial problems, in the direction of equitable distribution and balanced development of the regions. The purpose of this research is to measure the level of urban-rural infrastructure services and its relationship with demographic distribution in Khorasan Razavi province. This is a descriptive-analytic study. For collecting data, documentary and field studies were used to analyze the raw data and classify the cities of Khorasan Razavi province using multi-criteria decision making models and GIS software. The findings of the Vikor and AHPF model in the province's cities indicate non-distribution balanced of services. The city of Mashhad has the highest level, and the cities of Sabzevar and Neyshabur are moderate, and Khalil Abad and Jovein are in the unfavorable level. Considering that the city of Mashhad is the first Iranian pilgrimage city, it is the largest attraction zone of the province, it seems that these services are not balanced in comparison with other population centers. And so the research seeks out what strategies can be made to reach the equilibrium point, given local and regional conditions that are practical and feasible. Pearson test was used to investigate the relationship between demographic indicators and the status of cities in terms of urban services. The results showed that there is a direct relationship between population density and population growth rate with the focus of services. The distance from the center of the province is not significantly related to the level of facilities.
 
Key words: Population Distribution, Distribution of Services, Space Justice, Regional Inequality, Khorasan Razavi Province.
 



 


 
 



 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
           Spatial inequality in the deployment of area residents and activities is not a new phenomenon in any part of the world. But in developing countries, the spatial divergence between regions is exacerbated by the socioeconomic disparities and inequality in the distribution of essential services. Proper and optimal distribution of basic facilities in the social, economic, cultural and health sectors across regions and regions is one of the most important factors in preventing inequality and gaps in development and proper spatial distribution of population across the land. One of these areas is the metropolis of Mashhad in Khorasan Razavi province, which comprises a significant part of the population and is then hierarchically located in the cities of Neyshabur and Sabzevar. In this regard, we are dealing with cities that have not been able to compete with such large metropolitan areas, but this does not mean that the metropolitan areas of Khorasan Razavi have all the potential but rather that they should be compared to the population in which they are located. The city of Mashhad itself has many deprived areas that cannot compete with the central parts of the city and its populations lack basic and basic services on a large scale. Therefore, this research seeks to find out what is feasible and feasible for local and regional conditions, so that the province can be brought to regional equilibrium. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between population component distribution and basic services with the spatial justice approach in Khorasan Razavi cities. The obtained results were obtained through combination models and rank-sum method and correlation method.
Methodology:
           In this study, the integration model (a combination of multi-criteria decision making models) is used to analyze and weight the research indicators of the model (TOPSIS), and to integrate the eight indicators, the VIKOR model and the model A fuzzy hierarchy (AHPF) is used. At the end of the research, Pearson correlation test was used to investigate the relationship between population indices (population density and population growth rate) with the degree of basic services of provincial cities.
 Results and discussion:
           Findings of Vikor model and AHPF model in Khorasan Razavi province provinces show unbalanced distribution. Mashhad is in the highest level and the cities of Sabzevar and Neyshabur are in the average level and Khalilabad and Javin are in the lower level. Pearson test was used to examine the relationship between population density, distance of cities from provincial centers and population growth rate with the status of provinces. The results of this test show that there is a direct relationship between population density and natural growth rate with the distribution of urban services such that Mashhad, Neyshabour, Sabzevar and Quchan have the highest density and natural growth rate among provincial cities. They have a relatively favorable spatial distribution. The results showed that the relationship between the cities distance from the center of the province and the rate of enjoyment of the urban services index is very weak, so that Neyshabur and Sabzevar cities have relatively high distance with the capital city in the high ranks. They are indexed by municipal services, while Binaloud is 68 kilometrs from the provincial capital. Also by comparing the distance of Torbat-e-Heydariyeh and Torbat-Jam cities, both of which are approximately the same distance from the provincial capital but do not have the same status in terms of Utilities Index. In other words, the distance from the provincial capital does not guarantee superior municipal services at the regional level.
Conclusion:
         Given that many cities of Khorasan Razavi province are in undesirable level, paying attention to the potentials and capabilities of these areas, especially in the cultural and health index, can lead to significant spatial inequalities in the distribution of services and facilities. Reduce the need for balanced and balanced development at the regional level.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. 1.      Ahadnejad, M. Zolfi,. A. and M. Nourozi, (2013): The Evaluation of Population and Utilities Distribution in Urban Regions with Sustainable Development and Social Justice Approaches Using VIKOR AND TOPSIS Models(A case Study Zanjan City), Quarterly Journal of Human Geography,5(2), pp. 169-183.


2. 2.      Ahangari, A-M, and M. Saadatmehr, (2008): The Relationship between Risk and Private Investment in Iran, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), PP.1-16.


3. Amer, S. (2007). Towards spatial justice in urban health    services planning: a spatial-analytic GIS-based approach using Dar es Salaam, Tanzania as a case study (Vol. 140). Utrecht University.


4. 4.      Anabestani, A-A and M. Javanshiri, (2015): Spatial analysis comparative advantage of major groups of the rural population's job, Quarterly Journal of Space Economy & Rural Development, 4(4), PP. 23-50.


5. 5.      Badri, SA. Akbarian Ronizi, SAR and H. Javaheri, (2006): Determining the Developmental Levels of Rural Areas of Kamyaran County, Geographical Research Quarterly,21(3), PP. 130-116


6. Chang, H. S., & Liao, C. H. (2011). Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28(5), 361-371.


7. 7.      Esmaeilzadeh, H.  Karbasi, P.  Roy Del, J.  Afzali, M. and Z. Afzali, (2016): Spatial analysis of population & urban services distribution according to social justice using synthetic method(case study: Bonab city), Geographical Urban Planning Research, 4(2), PP. 260 – 241.


8. Gan, L., Li, D., & Song, S. (2006). Is the Zipf law spurious in explaining city-size distributions. Economics Letters, 92(2), 256-262.


9. Hangaragi, S, S. (2008), The Dimension of Inter-Taluka Disparities in the Levels of Development of Old Bijapur District of Karnataka State, Indian Journal of Regional Science, 40, 38-59


10. Henderson, V. (2002). Urbanization in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 17(1), 89-112.


11. 11.  Kalantari , Kh. Asadi, A and Sh. Choubchian, (2009): Compiling and Validation of Sustainable Rural Areas Development Indicators, Journal Urban - Regional Studies and Research, 1(2), PP. 69-86.


12. Kim ،Sukko. (2008), Spatial Inequality and Economic Development : Theories ،Facts ،and Policies. Washington ،DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development , The World Bank.


13. Liao, C. (2009), Explore the Spatial Equity of Urban Public Facility Allocation Base on Sustainable development.


14. 14.  Mahdavi, D. and A. Amiri, (2016): Evaluation and Grading of Villages in Kiar City Based on the Rate of Service and Infrastructure Indicators; Journal of Geography (Regional Planning); 6(4), PP. 109-131.


15. 15.  Maleki, S. and R. Ahmadi, (2013): The Investigation of Sustainability in the Distribution of Spatial Development in Cities of Khuzestan Province, Journal of Socio-Cultural Development Studies, 2(1), PP. 129-157.


16. Martinez, J, (2009). The use of GIS and Indicators to Monitor Intra-Urban Inequalities: A Case Study in Rosario, Argentina, Habitat International, Vol. 33, No. 1, Pp. 387- 396


17. 17.  Molai Hashtjin, N, (2003): Optimal Model for Rural Development Planning in Iran (Case Study: Southern Ardabil Province), Journal of Geographical Research, 70(122), PP. 47-73.


18. 18.  Mosalinejad, A, (2005): Government and Economic Development in Iran, Ghooms Publications, First Edition, Tehran.


19. 19.  Movahed, A. Tavallaei, S. Kamanroudi, M. and N. Tabei, (2014): Analysis of the spatial inequalities in distribution of services in neighborhoods of six region of Tehran, Town And Country Planning, 6(1), PP. 59-82.


20. Nel, E., & Rogerson, C. M. (2009, May). Re-thinking spatial inequalities in South Africa: Lessons from international experience. In Urban Forum (Vol. 20, No. 2, P. 141). Springer Netherlands.


21. 21.  Parizadi , T. Hosseini, F.   and H. Bhboody Moghadam, (2016): Analysis of the Spatial Inequalities in Distribution Utilities in Term of Righteoysness (Case Study: City Marivan, Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 21(6), PP. 91-102.


22. Paul, S, (2012), Analysis of Micro Level Disparities in Urban Facility-utility Services: a Study on Barasal city, West Bengal, India, Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, vol IV 2


23. 23.  Pourmohamadi , M.R  and N. Zali, (2010): Regional Disparities Analysis and Development Foresight (Case Study: East Azerbaijan Province), Journal of Geography and Planning, Volume:15 Issue:32,, PP. 29-64.


24. Pumain, D. (2004). Scaling laws and urban systems.


25. 25.  Sarvar , H. Lalepour, M. and S. Sarbazgholi, (2016): The Evaluating of Spatial Distribution of Population and Services in Urban Zones of Tabriz, Geography, 14(51), PP. 305-324.


26. Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert systems with applications, 37(12), 7745-7754.


27. 27.  Taleshi, M and M. Amir Fakhrian, (2013): Utilizing Quantitative Patterns for Spatial Analyzing of Population in Spatial Planning of Rural Settlements Case Study: Khorasan Razavi Province, Journal of Rural Research, 3(4), PP.111-134.


28. 28.  Tavakolinia, J. Moslemi ,A. Firozi , E. and S. Bandani, (2016): Analysis of the spatial distribution of population and distribution utilities on the basis Spatial Justice Case Study Ardabil, Geographical Urban Planning Research, 3(3), PP. 285-308,


29. Tsou, K. W., Hung, Y. T., & Chang, Y. L. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424-435.


30. Tsou, Ko-Wan, Yu-Ting Hung, Yao-Lin Chang. 2005. An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities, Journal of Cities, 22(6).


31. Uitermark, J., & Nicholls, W. (2017). Planning for social justice: Strategies, dilemmas, tradeoffs. Planning Theory, 16(1), 32-50.


32. 32.  Varesi, H-R. Rahmati, Gh and I. Bastani Far, (2007): Investigating the Impacts of Urban Services Distribution on Population Spatial Imbalance: A Case Study; Isfahan City Areas; Journal of Geography and Development, 5(9), PP. 91-106.


33. Yaghfoori, H. and Kashefi Doust, D, (2016). Distribution of Urban Facilities and Services by Social Justice Approach, Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 6(19).


34. Yaghfoori, H. Ghasemi, S. and Ghasemi, Na, (2017). Study of Spatial Justice in the Distribution of Services, with an Emphasis on Urban Management (Case study: the neighborhoods of nineteen district of Tehran), Geographical Research, 32(3), 114-128.


35. 35.  Zayyari, K. Mahdian Bahnemiri, M. and A. Mahdi, (2013): Survey of Spatial justice and measurement of urban public services benefice based on the Population distribution and accessibility in Babolsar city, Scientific Journals Management System, 13(28), PP. 217-241.