بررسی و تحلیل مولفه های زیست پذیری شهری در راستای توسعه پایدار ( نمونه موردی : قائم شهر)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

زینب کرکه آبادی ¹ (دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران.)
حمزه بهروزی ² (دانشجوی دکتری، جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/01/27 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/02/16 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/11/01

کلید واژه: توسعه پایدار, زیست پذیری, ابعاد زیست پذیری, قائم شهر,

چکیده مقاله :

زیست پذیری یکی از مبانی اصلی توسعه پایدار است که مستقیما بر ابعاد فیزیکی ،‌اجتماعی –اقتصادی و روانی زندگی مردم تاثیر می گذارد و در بر گیرنده ویژگی های اکتسابی محیط است که آن را به مکانی مطلوب، مناسب و جذاب برای زندگی و کار تبدیل می کند. نوشتار حاضر در پی آن است که با هدف شناخت پایه ای از وضعیت حاکم به زیست پذیری شهرقائمشهر بپردازد. برای دستیابی به این هدف با بهره گیری از روش توصیفی – تحلیلی و ابزار پرسشنامه محقق ساخته ; 383 نفر از شهروندان ساکن شهرقائمشهر به روش نمونه گیری احتمالی ( تصادفی ساده) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته و اطلاعات جمع آوری شده با استفاده از تحلیل های آزمون های T تک نمونه ای ، آزمون فریدمن، در نرم افزار SPSS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل آماری قرار گرفتند. نتایج به دست آمده نشانگر این است که با توجه مقایسه سه مولفه اجتماعی، اقتصادی و زیست محیطی شهر قائم شهر، مقدار میانگین رتبه ای در بعد اجتماعی برابر با 48/1، بعد اقتصادی برابر با 54/1 و بعد زیست محیطی برابر با 98/2 بوده است و مقدار آزمون فریدمن که بر مبنای آماره کای دو محاسبه می شود برابر با 326/551 و سطح معنی داری 000/0 بوده که نشان میدهد تفاوت معنی داری بین این سه مولفه وجود دارد. در بعد اجتماعی زیر شاخص کیفیت دفع آبهای سطحی در شاخص خدمات بهداشتی و درمانی به همراه تمامی موارد در شاخص زیر بنایی دارای میانگین کمتراز حد نرمال می باشند که نشانگر عدم زیست پذیری در شاخص های موجود می باشد. همچنین در بعد اقتصادی شاخص اشتغال و مسکن دارای وضعیت مناسبی نبوده و باید راهکارهای مناسب در این خصوص مدنظر مدیران و دست اندرکاران قرار گیرد. تمامی ابعاد شاخص زیست محیطی دارای حداقل میانگین لازم می باشند که نشانگر زیست پذیری کامل این بعد می باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Liability is one of the main foundations of sustainable development that directly affects the physical, socio-economic and psychological dimensions of people's lives and includes the acquired characteristics of the environment that make it a desirable, suitable and attractive place to live and work. Slowly The present article seeks to address the viability of Ghaemshahr city with the aim of understanding the basic situation. To achieve this goal, using a descriptive-analytical method and a researcher-made questionnaire; 383 citizens of Ghaemshahr city were evaluated by probabilistic sampling method (simple random) and the collected data were statistically analyzed using one-sample t-test analysis, Friedman test, in SPSS software. . The results show that according to the comparison of three social, economic and environmental components of Ghaemshahr, the average rank value in the social dimension is equal to 1.48, the economic dimension is equal to 1.54 and the environmental dimension is equal to 98 .2 The value of Friedman test, which is calculated based on chi-square statistics, is 551/326 and the significance level is 0.000, which shows that there is a significant difference between these three components. In the social dimension, the surface water disposal quality index in the health services index, along with all the items in the infrastructure index, have a lower than normal average, which indicates the lack of viability in the existing indicators. Also, in the economic dimension, the employment and housing index is not in a good condition and appropriate solutions should be considered by managers and stakeholders in this regard. All dimensions of the environmental index have the minimum required average, which indicates the full viability of this dimension.

منابع و مأخذ:

• Aliabadi, Mohammad (2012), The place of reason in the concept of urban sustainability Another look at the theoretical foundations of Islamic architecture and urban planning, Iranian Journal of Architectural Studies, Volume 1, Number 1; Page 25 to Page 37.

and Development Quarterly, No. 3, pp. 26-2

• Bandar Abad, Alireza (2011): A livable city from basics to meaning, Azarakhsh Publications, first edition, Tehran, pp. 55-67


• Burton, M. (2014). Quality of place. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and Well-Being research (pp. 5312–5314): Springer.


• De Jong, M., et al., (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon–eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner production, 109, pp. 25-38.


• Embry, M.( 2009) Designing community: The application of new urban principles to create authentic communities, Thesis Project, Master of Science Department of Geography.


• Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran. 45-52


• Ghanbari, Mohammad, Shokouhi, Mohammad Ajza, Rahnama, Mohammad Rahim, Kharazmi, Omid Ali, (2016), An analysis of urban viability with emphasis on security and sustainability (Case study: Mashhad metropolis), Political Geography Research Quarterly, first year, third issue.


• Ghorbani, Zeinab; Khakpour, Baratali; Mafi, Ezatullah; 1392. Analysis of the spatial distribution of quality of life in the neighborhoods of Chalous, research and urban planning, No. 13, pp. 18-1.


• -Hatami Nejad Hossein, Rezvani Mohammad Reza, Khosravi Kurdistani Fariba, Measuring the livability of the second region of Sanandaj, Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards Winter 2014. pp. 81-92


• Heylen, K. (2006). Liveability in social housing: three case studies in Flanders.


• -Issa Lou, Ali Asghar, colleagues 2014. Fig. Viability of a New Approach to Improve the Quality of Life in Rural Communities (Case Study: Qom County, Kahak Ward), Quarterly Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, No. 146, pp. 120-107


• Midgley and M. Livermore (1998), “Social Capital and Local Economic Development: Implications for Community Social Work Practice,” Journal of Community Practice 5(1/2): 29-40.


• , & Rickson, K. (2010). Happy people inmixed-up places: The associationbetween the degree and type of local socioeconomic mix and expressions ofneighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, 47(3), 467–485.


• Khorasani, Mohammad Amin (2012): "Explaining the viability of suburban villages


• Khorasani, Mohammad Amin, Rezvani, Mohammad Reza, Matiei Langroudi, Seyed Hassan, Rafieian, Mojtaba (2012) Measuring and evaluating the viability of suburban villages (Case study: Varamin city), Rural Research Quarterly, Winter 2012, third year, No. 4, pp. 104-79.


• Ley D. (1990). Urban liveability in context. Urban Geography, 11(1), pp. 31-35.


• Ley, A. and Newton, P. (2010) ‘Creating and sustaining liveable cities’, in Kallidaikurichi, S. andYuen,B.(Eds.):Developing Living Cities:From Analysis to Action, World Scientific,Singapore.


• Litman, T. 2011. Sustainability and Livability: Summary of Definitions, Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators.Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.


• Liu, and Lin, 2017, Urban Livability and Tourism Development in China: Analysis of Sustainable Development by Means of Spatial Panel Data. Habitat International,Vol. 68,PP99-107


• Arch.(2002) New Urbanism & Development in Contemporary China, Thesis Project, Master of Architecture.


• Mastura Adam, Norafida Ab Ghafar, Abubakar Ahmed, and Keumala Nila,(2017), A Systematic Review on City Liveability Global Research in the Built Environment: Publication and Citation Matrix, Journal of Design and Built Environment, Special Issue .


• McCrea, R., & Walters, P. (2012). Impacts of urban consolidation on urban liveability:Comparing an inner and outer suburb in Brisbane, Australia. Housing, Theory andSociety, 29(2), 190-206.


• McCrea, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (2005). Testing a moderated model of satisfactionwith urban living using data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia. SocialIndicators Research, 72(2), 121–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-2211-


• Mercer QualityofLivingSurvey. ⟨mercer.com.⟩.


• Mohamad, Kashef,(2016), Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries, Frontiers of Architectural Research.


• National Association of Regional Councils(NARC).(2003),U.S.D.epartment of Transportation .Newton,P.(2012),Liveable and Sustainable?Socio-Tecchnical Challenges for Twenty-First-Cntury Cities, Journal of Urban Technology, Vol.19, pp 81-102.


• Omuta, G. E. (1988). The quality of urban life and the perception of livability: A casestudy of neighbourhoods in Benin City, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 20(4),17-440.


• Rezvani, Mohammad Reza; Mansoorian, Hossein; 2008. Assessing Quality of Life: A


• Robert Steuteville (2016), “What is a livable Community, Anyway?,” Pubic Square, Congress for New Urbanism (www.cnu.org); at cnu.org/publicsquare/2016/10/25/what-livable-community anyway.


• Rue, H., Rooney, K., Dock, S., Ange, K., Twaddell, H., & Poncy, A. (2011). The role of FHWA programs in livability. Retrieved from http://www .fhwa . gov/livability/state _of _the _practice _summary/research2011.pdf; September 28, 2012


• Sarafi, Muzaffar, Tavakoli Nia, Jamileh, Mohammadian determined, Hassan. (1393). New ideas in urban planning. Tehran: Qadiani.


• Sasanpour, Farzaneh, Toulaei, Simin, Jafari Asadabadi, Hamzeh (2014) The viability of cities for sustainable urban development (Case study: Tehran metropolis) Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Geographical Association, Fall 2014, New Volume, Year 12, Number 42, pp. 129-157.


• Sasanpour, Farzaneh, Toulaei, Simin, Jafari Asadabadi, Hamzeh (2015) Measuring and Evaluating Urban Viability in Twenty-Two Districts of Tehran, Regional Planning Quarterly, Summer 2015, Volume 5, Year 5, Issue 18 , Pp. 27-42.


• Seif, AA, (2013), Modern Educational Psychology, Psychology of Learning and Education, Tehran, Doran Publishing


• Shamaei, Ali and Leila Bigdeli (2016) Dimensions of livability in the 17th district of Tehran, Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Geographical Association, Fall 2016 New Volume, Fourteenth Year, No. 50, pp. 171-191.


• Sofeska, E., 2017, Understanding the Livability ina City Through Smart Solutions and Urban Planning Toward Developing Sustainable Livable Future of the City of Skopje, International Conference –Green Urbanism, Procedia Environmental Sciences 37, PP. 442-453


• Soltanipour, Farzaneh, Damari, Behzad, (2016), Journal of the Faculty of Health and Institute of Health Research, Volume 14, Number 4 # R00170; Page 1 to Page 14.


• -Stanislav,A,&Chin,J.T.(2019).Evaluating livability and perceived values of Sustainable  neighborhood design: New Urbanism and original urban suburbs.Sustainable cities and society, 47, 101517.

Study of Concepts, Indicators, Models and Proposing Models for Rural Areas, Rural   

• Susan Shaheen, et al. (2016), Moving Toward a Sustainable California: Exploring Livability, Accessibility & Prosperity, UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center (http://innovativemobility.org) for the California Department of Transportation; at p81


• Tan Khee Giap,(2014), A new approach to measuring the liveability of cities:the Global Liveable Cities Index, World Review of Science, Technology and Sust. Development, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2014.


• Türksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurementof the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 163–187.


• UNEP (2013) City-level decoupling. Urban resource fl ows and the governance of infrastructuretransitions. A report of the Working Group on Cities of the International Resource Panel.UNEP, Nairobi


• UN-ESA (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division)(2014). World urbanization prospects [highlights]. The 2014 revision. (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)


• United Nations,(2014),World Urbanization Prospects, REVISION,2014.


• Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of redictions implied inthree theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research 34, 33–68.


• Victorian competition and efiiciency commission (2008), A state of Liveability: An in inguir in to enhancing victoria’s Liveability, final report


• Visser, P., Dam,V. F., & Hooimeijer, P. (2005). The influence of neighbourhood characteristics on geographical differences in house prices in the etherlands.In European Network for Housing Research (ENHR) International HousingConference (Vol.29,pp.149-169).


• Vuchic, V. (1999) Transportation for Livable Cities, Center for Urban Policy Research,New Jersey


• West, S. and M. Badham, (2008). A strategic framework for creating livable new communities: Final report, Victorian Growth Areas Authority: Melbourne, Victoria.


• Wheeler, Stephen; 2014. Planning for Sustainability: Creating a Livelihood, Balanced and Ecological Society, translated by Mahmoud Jamehpour and Shokoofeh Ahmadi, Social Science Publishing, Tehran.Baum, S., Arthurson,


• with a quality of life approach to the case study of Varamin city", PhD thesis in


• Woolcock, G. (2009). Measuring up? assessing the liveability of Australian cities.In State of Australian Cities: National Conference, Perth (pp. 1-19). PromacoConventions.


• Young, E., & Hermanson, V. (2013). Livability literature review: synthesis of current practice. In Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting (No. 13-2940).Washington, DC, USA: National Association of Regional Councils.                   


• Zarabi, Asghar, Mousavi, Miranjef, (2009), Study and function of small towns in regional development (Case study: Yazd province), Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, Volume 20, Number 2, Summer 2009


• Ziari,Keramatullah, Hatami, Ahmad, Mesbahi, Sahar, Ashouri, Hassan (1397) Evaluation and analysis of dimensions and components of livability of small cities for sustainable development (Case study of Bandar Deylam), Geography Quarterly (Planning Regional), Fall 1398, Year 9, No. 4, pp. 569-586.