شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل کلیدی مؤثر در سیاست‌گذاری توسعه فیزیکی شهر ارومیه

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

حسن حکمت نیا ¹ (دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه پیام‌نور یزد، یزد، ایران)
میرنجف موسوی ² (استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران)
محمد رسولی ³ (دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران)
شراره سعیدپور ⁴ (دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/10/07 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/12/04 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/05/01

کلید واژه: شهر ارومیه, توسعه فیزیکی شهر, سیاست زمین شهری, MACTOR,

چکیده مقاله :

رشد و توسعه اصولی شهرها تسهیل­گر روند پایداری می­باشد که جهت تحقق این مهم سیاست‌گذاری‌ها و ذینفعان مهم‌ترین مؤلفه دخیل در آن هستند. بدین منظور تحقیق حاضر با  هدف شناسایی و تحلیل  عوامل کلیدی مؤثر در سیاست‌گذاری توسعه فیزیکی شهر ارومیه در تلاش است که با اعمال سیاست­ها و تغییر در قدرت عملکرد بازیگران، روند توسعه شهر را در مسیر صحیح هدایت کند. نوع تحقیق حاضر ازنظر هدف کاربردی و ازنظر گردآوری داده توصیفی-تحلیلی بوده است. در این پژوهش به منظور بررسی چگونگی رشد و توسعه فیزیکی شهر ارومیه از مدل هلدرن، و با استفاده از نرم­افزار میک­مک شاخص­های مؤثر درروند توسعه این شهر شناسایی و سپس بازیگران کلیدی نقش‌آفرین در محیط نرم­افزار Mactor مورد تحلیل و اقدام به تعیین میزان رقابت­پذیری، همگرایی و توافق بین بازیگران کلیدی شده است. نتایج تحقیقات بر اساس محاسبات مدل هلدرن نشان داد که حدود 8/25 درصد رشد شهر ارومیه در فاصلۀ سال­های 1355 تا 1395، بر اثر رشد افقی بدقواره(­­اسپرال) شهر و حدود 2/74 درصد مابقی توسعۀ شهر ناشی از رشد جمعیت شهر بوده است که منجر به افزایش تراکم جمعیت و کاهش سرانۀ زمین شهری شده است. برای تحلیل و ارزیابی سیاست‌گذاری توسعه فیزیکی شهر ارومیه از31عامل استفاده شده است که بااستفاده از نرم­افزار میک­میک، 8 پیشران کلیدی در سیاست‌گذاری استخراج و 5 بازیگر کلیدی جهت پیشبرد این سیاست­ها شناخته‌شده‌اند که مدیران شهری و بنگاه­های شهری به ترتیب بیشترین قدرت رقابت­پذیری، صلاحیت، تأثیرگذاری را داشته­اند. درنهایت بیشترین توافق بازیگران در رابطه با گمانه­های توسعه فیزیکی بر احتمال تبدیل‌شدن شهر به جولانگاه بورس‌بازی زمین و مسکن، و سیاست­ آمرانه و متمرکز بوده است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Abstract
Principal growth and development of cities is facilitating the sustainability process. To accomplish this Policy-making and stakeholders are the most important component. For this purpose the present study with the aim of identifying and analyzing key factors Influencing in policy- making for environmental (physical) development of Urmia, Trying that by applying policies and changing the power of actors, direct the city development process in the right direction. The purpose of this study is practical and data collection has been descriptive-analytical. In this research the Holdern model has been used to investigate the physical development of the city of Urmia, and by using the MicMac software, effective indicators have been identified for the development of the city, and then key actors have been analyzed In the Mactor software, and action has been taken to determine the degree of competitiveness, convergence and agreement between key actors. The results of the research based on Holdern model calculations showed that about % -25.8 of the growth was in the city of Urmia between 1355 and 1395 due to the Spiral horizontal growth of the city and about 74.2 percent of the rest of the city's development was due to city population growth this has led to an increase in population density and a decline in urban land use. 31 factors were used to analyze and evaluate the policy- making for environmental (physical) development of Urmia. Using MicMac software, eight key drivers in policy- making have been identified and 5 key players to advance these policies. Those have had urban managers and urban firms in the highest order of competitiveness, competence, influence.  Eventually most of the actors agreed on the physical development bug  on the likelihood of the city becoming a land exchange for housing and housing, and a focused policy.
 
Key words: Urban Land Policy, environmental (physical) development of the City, Urmia City, MACTOR
 



 


 
 



 
 
 
Extended abstract
Introduction:
          Physical development is sustained when during the time, the city is environmentally habitable, and life is economically sustainable and be socially connected and uplifting. To this end, they should be precisely identified for proper policy making in the field of urban physical development, key city resources and areas that can be effective in this regard. The fundamental issue is that the lack of proper understanding of the forces contributing to the growth and expansion of the city cannot prevent its horizontal growth, so the most important step in achieving sustainable urban development is to identify key forces and factors that lead to the physical and urban growth of the city and, over time, lead to its sustainability.
Methodology:
       The present study is a descriptive-analytical method and in terms of nature, it is also part of applied research. The method of data collection is library and survey (questionnaire). In terms of the nature of the data, it is also a qualitative research. The statistical population in this study is 20 experts and faculty members of the Department of Geography of Urmia University. In this study, a Holdern model was used to illuminate the type of growth in Urmia and after collecting the indices and variables, the interaction matrix was formed in two stages, So that the indexes are in rows and columns. Mic Mac and Mactor software were used to convert indexes and variables.
 
Results:
       The result of the Holdern model calculations, it indicated that In the years 1355-1395 regardless of its quantity one can imagine the phenomenon of irregular horizontal dispersion for the city of Urmia, In order to identify the key factors influencing the policy- making for environmental (physical) development of Urmia City were extracted early Factors Influencing the Future of Physical Development of Urmia City Using the Delphi Method. And it was identified by examining the questionnaires received from the experts overall 31 factors in 4 different domains as the primary variables. that is according to experts in the MicMac software environment 8 Indicators as Key Proponents of policy- making for environmental (physical) development of Urmia City. and according to the key factors, five key players (Citizens (Buyers - Landowners), Departments (Ministry of Interior, Roads and Urban Development, Natural Resources, Agricultural Jihad, Land Management, Endowments, Documentation and Real Estate, Revolutionary Institutions, Military Institutions), Managers and Local Organizations (Council And municipalities), agencies, cooperatives and the private sector) in the realization of city development policies were identified using the Mactor model. Investigations in the field of actors have shown the most direct and indirect effects by urban managers (council and municipality). Who played the most roles for inter-departmental coordination in line with the physical development of Urmia and firms were next.
 
Conclusion:    
        This study evaluates the actors' views on the key factors influencing the policy- making for environmental (physical) development of Urmia. That was according to the assessments; Lack of strength of local government institutions, subordinate and centralized policy rather than expert policy, weak coordination among urban management agencies, turning the city into a place for landowners and urban housing, lack of transparency of land and urban housing policies. Turning the city into a field for stockholders can be subject to the lack of transparency of land policies and urban housing. Finally it must be said Municipalities and councils, as the most active actors in the physical development process of the city, need to establish a close and coordinated process with other institutions, including the administrative sector to make policies and laws clearer. Also, due to the close relationship between the firms and the citizens, it is necessary to intervene in this area, especially the municipal administration, especially the municipalities and weaken this link, which is one of the factors behind the city's inappropriate development Finally, given the limited municipal activities in the field of urban management despite the different actors, it is necessary to pay more attention to this management body as coordinator of other urban sectors and highlight its role.
 

منابع و مأخذ:

1. 1.       Ahmadi, Sh. (2018). Analysis of the Limitations of the Physical Development of Cities (Case Study: Sardasht City), Journal of student of Human Settlement Planning, 12(4): 953-972.


2. 2.       ­Amiri, M. Mojtabazadeh Khanghahi, H. Ziari, Y. Nuri Kermani, A. (2019) analysis of effective variables in the process of policy- making for environmental(physical) development of sari, Scientific &International Journal, 61(17): 125-139.


3. 3.       Amoateng, P., Cobbinah, P.B., Adade, K.O (2013) Managing physical development in peri-urban areas of Kumasi, Ghana: A case of Abuakwa. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, V.7, n.1, pp:  96-109


4. 4.       ­Azimi, N. Zali, N. Azadeh, S.R. (2016). Analysis of the Patterns of Physical Development of Iranian Cities According to Population, Natural and Physical Variables, Human Geography Research Quarterly, 48(3): 461-473.


5. 5.       Fang, Li., Li, Peng, Song, Sh(2017), China's urban development policies and city growth dynamics: An analysis based on the Gibrat's Law, International Review of Economics:1-8


6. 6.       Ghadiry, M. Dasta, F. (2016), an Analyzing of the Physical- Spatial Growth Pattern of Tehran Metropolis, Geographical Researches Quarterly Journal, 31(1):31-45


7. 7.       Ghasemi, H. (2016) Presentation thephysical development model of Abadeh-e-Tashkaccording tosmart growth urban, Thesis on Geomorphology, Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Science and Economic, Payam-e-Noor University.


8. 8.       Hekmatnia, H. Mousavi, M. (2013). Model Application in Geography with Emphasis on Urban and Regional Planing, Third edition, Tehran, azadpeyma Publications,


9. 9.       Hill, C., and Jones, G. (2009). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Cengage Learning publisher, Canada, 524 pages


10. 10.   Hoseinzadeh, K. Houshyaar, H. (2007) The effective elements and viewpoints on the physical development of cities in Iran, Geography and Regional Development, 6: 213-226


11. 11.   Hoseinzadeh, R. (2017). Future studies of physical changes in large cities with the approach of Urban Sustainable development, case Study: Orumieh City, Thesis Ph.D in Geography and Urban Planning, Department of social Sciences, Payame Noor University.


12. 12.   Justice Kufour, O.A., Atta-Boateng, F (2016), The Spatial Expression of Physical Development Controls in a Fast Groing Ghanaian City, Land use policy, No, 54: 147-157.


13. 13.   Karimi, A. (2014), investigating and analyzing effective elements on urban physical expansion with emphasis on permanent urban expansion Case study (Noorabad city), Requirements for the Degree of master of Science (M.Sc.)in Geographyaqnd Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Science, Hakim SabzevariUniversity


14. 14.   Lam, sh. T., Conway, T.M(2018), Ecosystem services in urban land use planning policies: A case study of Ontario municipalities, Land Use Policy, No. 77: 641-651


15. 15.   Long, Y., Huang, C.C., 2017. Does block size matter? The impact of urban design on economic vitality. For Chinese cities. Environ. Plann. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 0 (0) :1–17.


16. 16.   Mabasa, A., Davis shekede, M., chirisa L., Gwitira, I., Bandauko, E (2015), urban physical development and master planning in Zimbabwe: An assessment of conformance in the city of Mutare, university of Zimbabwe.


17. 17.   Nahrin, K. (2018). Urban development policies for the provision of utility infrastructure: a case study of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Utilities Policy 54 : 107–114.


18. 18.   Nasiri, E., Nasser, M. (2014). Analysis of factors Affecting Physical Development of Small Towns in the Last Two Decades (Case Study: Garmdarreh City), Scientific and Research Electronic Journals, 6(19): 44-53


19. 19.   Ploeger, H., Bounjouh, H (2017), The Dutch urban ground lease: A valuable tool for land policy?, Land Use Policy, No. 63: 78-85


20. 20.   Pourramzan, E. Majd Rahimabadi, M. (2015).Analysis the Influenced Factors on Physical Development of Rahim Abad City (Rodsar Township) in the last two Decades, Journal Management System,5(17): 135-150


21. 21.    Roostayi, Sh. Ali Akbari, E. Hoseinzadeh, R. (2016). Studying the Key Influencing Factors On The Growth Of Large Cities (Case Studt: The City of Urmia), Quarterly Research and Urban Planning, 7(26): 53-74


22. 22.    ­Savari, M. (2016), Urban management role in physical development the Izeh city, A Thesis (M.Sc.)in Geography, Faculty of Human Sciences, Golestan University.


23. 23.    Shamsodini, A. Kian, P. Amiri, M.R. (2016), Spatial Analysis of Physical Development of the City Nurabad Mamasani With an Emphasis on Healthy City indicators, Quarterly Research and Urban Planning, 7(26): 113-130


24. 24.    Statistical Center of Iran. (2016), Kurdistan Statistics


25. 25.    Wu, J., Guo, Q., Hewings, G. J (2019), Land regulating economy as a policy instrument in urban China, Cities, No.94: 225-234

26. ­Ziari, K. Pourahmad, A. Ghahraei, H. (2019) Urban Land Policies and their Effects on the Physical Development of Isfahan, Human Geography Research Quarterly, 51(1):­ 211-227.