تجارب زیسته اساتید دانشگاه پیام نور از چالشهای ارزشیابی آنلاین در دوران همه گیری کرونا
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
پروین ذوالقدری
1
,
مرجان کیان
2
1 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: ارزشیابی آنلاین, چالش¬ها, تجربه زیسته,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تجربه زیسته اساتید دانشگاه پیام نور از چالشهای ارزشیابی آنلاین در دوران همه گیری کرونا انجام شد. این پژوهش کیفی و از نوع پدیدارشناسی است. جامعه مورد مطالعه شامل همه اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه پیام نور استان زنجان به تعداد 23 نفر در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 است. با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری در دسترس 15 نفر به عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری، مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود که از طریق روشهای پرسش از همکار و چک اعضا، دادهها تأیید و برای تحلیل دادهها از روش تحلیل مضمون استفاده شد. بر اساس یافته‌های بدست آمده، مهمترین چالشهای ارزشیابی در قالب 5 مضمون اصلی (مشکلات ناشی از امکانات نرم افزاری و سخت افزاری، فقدان دانش مبتنی بر فناوری، افزایش تقلب، مشکلات فرهنگی-اجتماعی و مشکلات جسمی و روانی)، فرصتهای آن شامل 5 مضمون (اقتصادی، بهداشتی، فنی، آموزشی و زمانی) شناسایی شد. همچنین عمدهترین راهکارها برای غلبه بر چالشهای ارزشیابی در قالب 4 مضمون اصلی (استفاده از ارزشیابی حضوری- الکترونیکی، استفاده از ارزشیابی چندگانه، ارزشیابی مبتنی بر کوییز، تغییر در شکل ظاهری و محتوای آزمونها) دسته بندی شد. متناسب با آسیبها و بالا بردن کیفیت ارزشیابی پیشنهاد شد اساتید از روشهای ارزشیابی تلفیقی و آزمونهای الکترونیکی به صورت کوییز در فواصل زمانی کوتاه در طول ترم برای ارزشیابی آموختههای دانشجویان استفاده کنند.
The aim of this study was to investigate Professors'Lived Experience of Payam Noor University from the online evaluation challenges in during the Corona epidemic. This is a qualitative and phenomenology research.The studied community includes all faculty members of Payam Noor University in Zanjan province, 23 people in the academic year of 1400-1401. Using the Convenience Sampling method, 15 people were selected as research sample. Data collection tool was semi-structured interview and content analysis method was used for data analysis. The validity of the data was verified through methods of asking a colleague and checking members. Based on the Findings, the main evaluation challenges in the form of 5 main themes (problems caused by software and hardware facilities, lack of technology-based knowledge, increase in fraud, socio-cultural problems and physical and psychological problems), its opportunities included 5 themes(economic, health, technical, educational and time) were identified. Also main soluation for overcoming to these challenges in the form of 4 main themes (use of in-person-electronic evaluation, the use of multiple evaluations, quiz-based evaluation, changes in the appearance and content of the tests) were categorized. In proportion to these harms and improving the quality of evaluation, it was suggested that professors should use integrated evaluation methods and electronic tests in the form of quizzes in short intervals during the semester to evaluate the students' learning.
Abbasi Kasani, H., Shams Mourkani, G., Seraji, F., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Abedi, H. (20200). E-learning challenges in Iran: A research synthesis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 96-116.
AL-Emran, M., & Salloum, S. A.(2020). Students Attitudes Towards the Use of Mobil Technologies in E-valuation. Int. J. Intract. Mob. Technol., 11(5) 195-202.
Adibmanesh, M. (2021). Living experience of primary and secondary school teachers from teaching challenges and providing solutions to empower teachers to teach in cyberspace (Jouranal of Research in Curriculum Planning), vol 18 No 43, 60-75.
Al-Qahtani, M.H. (2020). Teachers and students perceptions of virtual classes and Effectiveness of virtual classes in Enhancing Communication Skills. Classes in Enhancing Communication Skills. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue: The Dynamics of EFL in Saudi Arabia. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3512530.
Bararim N., khorasanim A., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Alami, F. (2019). Educational standads for feedback design in e-learning environments. based on the Bloom-Anderson classification. Educational Scinces (Journal of Educational Scinces and Psyclogy., 26(1), 155-174.
Boyle,P.Pettigrove, M.& Atkinson, C. (2009).Australian national universitystudentevaluation of teaching ANUSET: a guide for academic staff. 3rded. Canberra: Australian National
Bacon, A. K., & Ham, L. S. (2020). Attention to social threat as a vulnerability to the development of comorbid social anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorders: an avoidance-coping cognitive model. Addictive behaviors, 35(11), 925-939.
Glaser, B.& Strauss, A. (1998). The discovery of grounded theory , Aldine Publishing Company. Chicago.
Ganji Arjenaki, B. (2017). Surveying The Quality of Electronic Tests in The Students Satisfaction, Education Strategies in Medical, 10(3):180-188.
Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Yaqin, L. N., Parhanuddin, L., Razak, R. A., Nazry, N. N. M., . . . Fathurrijal, F. (2021). Mapping instructional barriers during covid-19 outbreak: Islamic education context. Religions, 12(1), 50.
Jafari, M. Chenari, Kh, Nourizadeh, SH. (2021). Types of e-Learning and Expert-Based Evaluation. Intelligent Multimedia Processing and Communication Systems (IMPCS).1(1).
Jefferson, R. N., & Arnold, L. W. (2009). Effects of virtual education on academic culture: Perceived advantages and disadvantages. Online Submission, 6(3), 61-66.
Kian, M.(2019). Identifying Mobail Phone Educational Capabilities for Graduate Students. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies Vol9. No18,135-158.
Lee, A. N., Nie, Y., & Bai, B. (202o). Perceived principalꞌs learning support and its relationships with psychological needs satisfaction, organisational commitment and change-oriented work behaviour: A Self-Determination Theory’s perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 93, 103-110.
Mirani Sargazi, N,. Heydar Abravan, M, J,. Asgari, M,. and Kosh Khahesh, R. (2022). Corona and the Challenges of Virtual Education in Iran, 2nd Conference on Psychology, Educational Science, Social Sciences and Counseling, Tehran.
Mihai, S,. & Grabka, D. (2019). U. S. Patent No. 10, 339.616. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Naseri. (2018). Examining the lived experience of humanities department professors of evaluation methodsStudents and its psychological consequences. . Master thesis of Ferdowsi University Mashhad.
Rezaei, A. M. (2020). Evaluating what students have learned during the Corona: Challenges and solutions. Quarterly of Educational Psychology, 16(56), 179-214.
Rezaei, SH,. Malkeian, F, GHasemi, A, Mohammadi, S,.(2023). Professors'Lived Experience of Online evaluation in the e-learning system of Islamic Azad University during the covid-19 epidemic, challenges and solutions, Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences
Roshani ali bene see H. Shahalizadeh M . Heydari S, Fattahi M. (2017). Implementation Pathology of the E-learning Curriculum in Iran (Cacse Study Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran). 7 (2): 44-61.
Seraji, F. (2014). Evaluation in virtual enviroment . Iranian Encyciopedia of Curriculum 1-5 [In Persian]
Safford. K., & Stinton, J. (2016). Barriers to belended digital distance vocational Learning for non-traditional students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1). 135-150.
Sarlak M. (2018). Virtualization of Universities in Iran. J of Information Technology;23: 45-51.
Urdan, A. (2002). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new Frontier, Comput Educ, 4(1), 23-41.
Vonderwellm S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experienses and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Educatin, 6, 77-90.
Sabon, Y. o. , Istyiono, E., & Salamah, U. (2022). Technology Literacy in the Development of Mathematics Learning in Indonesia During the Covid- 19 Pandemic. In 5th International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE) (pp. 137-142). Atlantis Press.
Zamani, B. E., Parhizi, R., & Kaviani, H. (2015). Identify challenges of evaluating students' academic performance e-courses. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 9(2), 105-112.
Zaikin, O,: Kushtina, E. & Rozewski, P. (2005). Algorithm of the Conceptual Seheme Formatiom for Knowledge Domain in Distance Learning, European. Journal of Operational Research, 2(4), 327-340.