بررسی فرصت‌ها و تهدیدها، قوت‌ها و ضعف‌های کاربست نوآوری‌های هوشمندسازی مطالعه موردی دبیران مدارس متوسطه شهر اصفهان
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیعشرت زمانی 1 , علی قاسم پور 2 , رضا همایی 3 , ستاره موسوی 4
1 - 1دانشیار و عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
2 - 2استادیار و عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه پیام نور شهررضا، شهرضا، ایران
3 - 3استادیار و عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه پیام نور استان اصفهان
4 - 4دانشجوی دکتری برنامه درسی دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: نوآوری‌های هوشمندسازی, تدریس, فرصت‌ها و تهدیدها, قوت‌ها, ضعف‌ها,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی فرصت‌ها و تهدیدها، قوت‌ها و ضعف‌های کاربست نوآوری‌های هوشمندسازی مطالعه موردی دبیران مدارس متوسطه شهر اصفهان صورت گرفته است. جامعه آماری مشتمل بر کلیه دبیران مدارس متوسطه در نواحی پنج گانه شهر اصفهان در سال تحصیلی 90-1389 (2608N=) بوده است، از این تعداد 355 نفر با استفاده از جدول مورگان و از طریق نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای نسبی به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد. ابزارهای مورد استفاده شامل مصاحبه و پرسشنامه دموگرافیک است یافته‌ها با استفاده از نرم افزار Spss تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد زمانی که این فناوری نوین با فرایند تدریس تلفیق می‌شود، امر تدریس مؤثر و رضایت بخش‌تر می‌گردد. همچنین علاوه بر افزایش توانمندی‌های اساتید در تدریس، شیوه تدریس را سهل و آسان می‌کند. در نهایت در این مقاله به نقاط قوت و ضعف، قوت و ضعف‌های کاربست نوآوری‌های هوشمند سازی در زمینه تدریس از دیدگاه دبیران مدارس متوسطه شهر اصفهان پرداخته است.
The recent research was done to consider oppertunities and threats, strengths and weaknesses of using smart innovations (case study: Isfahan highschool teachers). The population included all the highschool teachers in fifth regions (N= 2608) in 2010-2011. 355 people were selected by using Morgan table and relative stratifid sampling.The used instruments were included the interview and demographic questionnaire. the findings was analyzed by using Spss. The findings showed that when new thechnology combined with teaching process, teaching could be more effective and satisfying. Also it increased not only professors’ abilities in teaching, but also it made teaching method easier. Finally this article was considered strengths and weaknesses of using smart innovations in teaching from Isfahan highschool teachers, perspectives.
Afioni, Safoura. Forughi Abari, Ahmad,.A, Yarmohammadian, Mohammad H, (2013). Study the feasibility of implementing virtual training courses in Islamic Azad University. Journal of Research in Planning,. 12, PP S80-92[Persian].
Afzal Khani, Maryam., Ghods, Solmaz. (2011).Evaluation of smart schools in the province of administrators and teachers. Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education,, 1 )2(,PP23-39[Persian].
Albirini, A. (2003).Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers and Education, 47(4) 373-398.Kankaanrinta, Ilta-Kanerva2000).). Finnish Kindergarten Student Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Modern Information and Communication Technologies. Retrieved from http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/media/mep9/kankaanrinta _ mep9 .pdf [12-08-2003].
Al-Zaidiyeen, N., Lai Mei, L., Soon Fook, F.(2010).Teachers’ Attitudes and Levels of TechnologyUse in Classrooms: The Case of Jordan Schools. International Education Studies, 3,)2(,PP211-218.
Aydın, Cengiz Hakan؛ Tasci, Deniz..(2004). Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflectionsfrom an Emerging Country. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4),PP 244-257[Persian].
Bagherian, Fateme. (2002).Consequences of using the Internet for higher education: a review of social psychology this phenomenon. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 8(1(, PP23-24[Persian].
Bergen, D.(2000). Linking technology and teaching practice. Childhood Education, 76(4),PP 252–53.
Bolstad, R, (2004). The role and potential of ICT in early childhood education. A review of New Zealand and International literature, 12) 21(, PP21-32.
Borotis, S. & Poulymenakou A (2004)..E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider before adopting e-Learning Interventions. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 1629-1622(Chesapeake, VA: AACE
Center for Educational Leadership Trinity University San Antonio, Texas(1992). Smart School for S San Antonio’s Future. A report on Public Education.
Chang V, Palmer J. (2003).Three instructional principles applied to Computer Based Learning (CBL) .Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
Couse, L. & Chen, D (2010). A Tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education, published PHDs thesis, university of new Hampshive.
Deilomgani, M (2003). Information technology in educational programs. Journal of Educational Technology, 5)22(,PP102-112.
Ebadi, Mohammad. (2007).Information technology and education. Tehran: Institute for Development of Educational Technology in schools. [Persian].
Gall, Merdit; Borg, Walter, and Gall, Joice, (2007). Quantitative and qualitative research methods in psychology, translated by Ahmad Reza Nasr al, Tehran: publisher side. [Persian].
Garrison, D.. RSS. Anderson, Terry (2006).E-learning in the 21st century), translated by Mohammad Attar. Tehran: Institute for Development of Educational Technology Smart Schools [Persian].
Georgina, D. A, & Olson, M. R (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 11,PP 1-8.
Gladun, A., & Rogushina, J (2009).An application of intelligent techniques and semantic web technologies in e-learning environments. An International Journal, 36(2), PP1922-1931.
Hadad, W.D &Draxler, A (2002).The dynamics of Technologies for Education. In w.D Hadad & Draxler (EDS) Technologies for Education: potential, parameters &prospects.(pp 2-17) paris:UNESCO.
Kafash, Hamidreza. (2009). The necessity of e-learning content, Journal of Development of Technical and Vocational courses, 6(4), PP20-32[Persian].
Kaur, Kuldip & Abas, Zoraini. (2004). An Assessment of e-Learning Readiness at the OpenUniversity Malaysia. International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE) (pp 1017-1022. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Exhibition Center
Lopes, CT(2007)..Evaluating e-learning readiness in a health sciences higher education institution. In Miguel Baptista Nunes and Maggie McPherson (Eds),IADIS International Conference e-Learning (pp59-67). Retrieved from http:// www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/showsearch/iadis-international-conference-e-learning-2007-part-of-mccsis-2007
lopez, J & M (2010). Technology and preschool education in Mexico: country in transformation –chapter 4-technology for early childhood education and Socialization: develop men applications methodologies editors Sally blake and Satomi Taylor.
Mahmoudi, Jaffar. Nalchiygar, Soroush. Ebrahimi, Seied Babak. B. and Sadeghi Moghadam, Mohammad.R. (2006).Smart schools in the country's development challenges, Journal of educational Innovations, 27,PP61-78 [Persian].
Maleki,Hassan. Garmabi Hassan,A, (2007). Status and application of ICT in the primary school curriculum experts and teachers in Tehran, Journal of Educational Innovations, 31, PP36-52[Persian].
Masters Farahani, Fateme. Rezai,Ali. Hasanlu, Hassan, (2012). Barriers to the use of information and communication technologies in the teaching and learning process, Journal of Educational guidelines, course 1(1) PP25-35[Persian].
Mehtadi,Somaie.Atashak,Mohammad.(2014). The effectiveness of electronic interactive exercises designed to learning English. Research in Curriculum Planning, 12(44),1-13[Persian].
Melikian, Faramarz., Narimani, Maryam, Sahebjami,Sagar, (2009). The role of motivation in students' cognitive and metacognitive strategies of ICT-based educational system. Journal of Research in Planning, 25 pp. 21-38[Persian].
Miller MT, Mei-Yan L,Serving (2003). Non-traditional learners in e-learning environments: Building successful communities in the virtual campus. Educe Media Int, 40)1(, PP163-169.from: http://web.ebscohost.com
Mossadegh, Hossein, (2011).The Feasibility of organizing learning in Yazd Gas Company, published master s thesise. Tehran University. [Persian].
Mungania, P.(2003). The seven e-learning barriers facing employees. Kentucky: University of Louisville.
NAEYC, N (1996). Position Statement: Technology and young children—Ages three through eight. Young Children, Education Journal, 24(1), PP 43–44.
Pelgrum, W.D & Anderson, R.E (2001).ICT &the emerging paradigm for lifelong learning .Amesterdam: IEA. (1999-2001).
Psycharis, S (2011). Presumptions and actions affecting an e-learning adoption by the educational system Implementation using virtual private networks، University of the Aegean – Department of Primary Education and Greek Pedagogical Institute،(http://www،eurodl،org/?p=&sp=full article =204).
RezaeiRad,Mojtaba.Falah,Ebrahim.(2014). The effect of education on the mobile phone on achievement motivation, self-concept and academic achievement of students in Arabic language .Research in Curriculum Planning,12(44),1-13[Persian].
Sheikhs, F. (2012).Role of pedagogical quality of e-learning: from theory to application. Effective schools, 9(20)PP101-112.
So, K & Swatman, P.(2007).E-Learning Readiness in the Classroom: a study of Hong Kongprimary and secondary teachers. University of South Australia. Retrieved fromhttp://www.collecter.org/archives/2006-june/22.pdf.
Summak, M., Baglibel, M., Samancioglu, M(2007) . Technology readiness of primary schoolteachers: A case study in Turkey. Innovation and Creativity in Education2,(2),PP 2671- 2675.Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com
Ya'acob, A., Mohd Nor, N. F., & Azman, H (2005).Implementation of the Malaysian smart school: An investigation of teaching-learning practices and teacher-student readiness. Internet Journal of e-Language Learning & Teaching,2,)2(, PP16-25.
Yaghobi, Asgar, (2008). Students and faculty members in the desirable features of e-learning in higher education: virtual students' perspective, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 14(1) PP160-173[Persian]..
Yarmohammadian, Mohammad,H, Shafipour Motlag, Farhad. (2013). A model to evaluate the factors influencing the development of effective communication between student and teacher perceptions of smart schools. Journal of Research in Planning, 2, )9(,PP 16-26[Persian].
Yildirim, S (2010).Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A reviewof teacher’s ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media2007., 34(2) 171-186.
Yu, S., Chen I. J., Yang, K. F., Wang, T. F., & Yen, L. L (2007). A feasibility study on the adoption of e-learning for public health nurse continuing education in Taiwan, Nurse Educ.Today, 27( 7)PP 755-761.
Zain, M. Z. M., & Murugaiah, P (2004). Management practice in Malaysian Smart School: Tasks and support analysis of the ICT implementation. In Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies,,PP 1008-1012.
Zamani, Eshrat. Ghasab pour, Bita. Jabalameli, Jalal, (2010). Evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the smart schools. Quarterly innovative educational teeth. 4(36),PP 79-100[Persian].