بررسی نقش عناصر برنامه درسی کلاین در افت تحصیلی درس ریاضی سال اول دوره متوسطه از دیدگاه شرکای برنامه درسی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیکیمیا ابراهیم کافوری 1 , حسن ملکی 2 , علی اکبر خسروی بابادی 3
1 - 1دانشجو کارشناسی ارشد، واحد تهران مرکزی، ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - 2دانشیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
3 - 3استادیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم اجتماعی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: افت تحصیلی, شرکای برنامه درسی, درس ریاضی, عناصر برنامه درسی کلاین,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش عناصر برنامه درسی کلاین در افت تحصیلی درس ریاضی سال اول متوسطه از دیدگاه شرکای برنامه درسی با استفاده از روش پژوهش آمیخته صورت گرفت. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه‌ای برای 368 دانش‌آموز و 120 دبیر ریاضی پایه اول دبیرستان‌های شهر تهران و مصاحبه‌ای با 15 کارشناس برنامه ریزی درسی و تألیف کتاب ریاضی سال اول متوسطه جمع‌آوری شدند. تحلیل داده‌های کمی از طریق آزمون‌های t تک نمونه‌ای، t دو گروه مستقل و فریدمن و تحلیل داده‌های کیفی به وسیله کدبندی استقرایی انجام شد. نتایج بررسی نشان داد که از نظر هر سه گروه، همه عناصر نه گانه برنامه درسی کلاین بر افت تحصیلی ریاضی دانش‌آموزان مؤثرند. از نظر دبیران فعالیت‌های یادگیری، راهبردهای یاددهی ـ یادگیری، مواد و منابع آموزشی و زمان آموزش و از نظر دانش‌آموزان، زمان آموزش، ارزشیابی، فعالیت‌های یادگیری، و راهبردهای یاددهی ـ یادگیری در اولویت‌های اول تا چهارم قرار گرفتند. از لحاظ تأثیر عناصر مواد و منابع آموزشی، فضای آموزش و گروه‌بندی دانش‌آموزان بر افت تحصیلی ریاضی، بین نظر دبیران و دانش‌آموزان تفاوت معناداری دیده نشد ولی بین نظر آنها درباره تأثیر عناصر اهداف، محتوا، راهبردهای یاددهی ـ یادگیری، فعالیت‌های یادگیری، زمان و ارزشیابی بر افت تحصیلی ریاضی تفاوت معنادار بود.
Once considering the viewpoints of the curriculum counterparts, this study was conducted to study about the influence of Klein’s curriculum components on the 1st year high school students’ math course drop out. The mixed-research method had been used for this study. The data were collected by means of a questioners distributed amongst the 365 students and 120 math teachers as well as the interview with 15 specialties of the curriculum planning and text book developing. The quantitative data analysis had been done by one-sample T- test, two independent-samples T-test, and Friedman tests. Inductive coding, also, was used for qualitative data analysis. The results showed that according to three above- mentioned groups, all nine Klein’s curriculum components are operative in math drop out. The first four polarities, from the teachers' points of view, have been categorized as: learning activities, teaching- learning methods, instructional materials and resources as well as Instructional time. These factors, however, from the students' points of view, are classified as instructional time, evaluation, learning activities, and teaching- learning methods, respectively .No significant difference was found between the teachers' and students' viewpoints regarding the influences of instructional materials and resources, instructional space, and learners grouping on math dropout however, such influence considering the objectives, content, teaching- learning methods, learning activities, Instructional time, and evaluation are found to be significantly different.
Ahmadvand Esmat, (2001). A meta-analysis survey on researches which are carried out from 1973 to 2000 in the field of dropout, MS dissertation, psychology and instructional science department, Alameh Tabatabaee university [Persian Alamolhodaei seied Hasan, (2002). Novel guidelines in Math instruction, Tehran: Shiveh publication [Persian] Biabangard Esmaeel, (2010). Methods for dropout prevention, Tehran: parents-teachers society publication [Persian] Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating student to learn, New York: McGraw- hill. Esmaeeli Reza, and Kordabadi Mohammad, (1992). Effective causes of dropouts among first year students in higher schools of province Isfahan, Report on a research by research council of central education & upbringing governmental office of province Isfahan [Persian] Fathi vajargah Kourosh, (2009). Basic fundamentals and concepts of curriculum planning, Tehran: Baal publication [Persian] Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and student at risk, Washington, DC: national center for education statistics. Fuller, B. (1987). School effects in the third world, journal of education research, Vol. 57, pp. 255- 292. Hashemi Zahra beigom, (2006). Recognition to educational factor and other factors such as personal and family educational falling of freshman girl students in Shirvan high school in opinion of teachers and students, M.S. Dissertation, Educational science and psychology department, Shahid Beheshti University [Persian] Irani Yousef, (2004). An investigation on the in-school causes of dropout among higher school students of province Qom in educational year (2001-2002), A research plan by education organization of province Qom [Persian] Johnson Burke, and Christensen Larry, (2008). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, Translated version by Khosravi Ali akbar, Pooshaneh Kambiz, and Aghazadeh Moharam, Tehran: aiezh publication [Persian] Karami Morteza, Mohamadzadeh Ghasr Azam, and Afshari Masoumeh, (2012). The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Group tendency and Academic Achievement of High School Students in Mashhad, Research in Curriculum Planning, Islamic Azad University, Khurasgan, Isfahan, Vol. 9, No. 6 (continues no. 33), pp. 93-105 [Persian] Karimi Abdolazim, (2007). A view on the ranking and progress of Iranian students in the TIMSS and PIRLS studies, A report of national center of TIMSS and PIRLS at Iranian research center of education studies [Persian] Kilpatric Jeremy, and Swafford Jane, (2002). Helping children learn mathematics, Translated version by Behzad Mahdi, and Gooya Zahra, Tehran: Fatemi publication [Persian] Kim, L. Y. (1993). Factors affecting student learning outcomes, annual meeting of the American educational research, Atlanta press. Lee, V. & Burkam, D. (2003). Dropping out of high school: the role of school organization and structure. American educational research journal, Vol. 40, pp. 353-393. Lever, N., Sander, M. A., Lombardo, S., Randall, C., Axelrod, J., Rubenstein, M. & et al. (2004). A drop-out prevention program for high-risk inner-city youth, behavior modification, Vol. 28, pp. 513 –515. Lotfi Karachi Ebrahim, (2004). An investigation on the influence of meaningful learning approach on the academic achievement among students of secondary school 3rd class in math and social science, A research plan by Iranian education organization [Persian] Maleki Hasan, (2008). An introduction to curriculum planning, Tehran: SAMT Publication [Persian] Mehrmohammadi Mahmoud, and colleagues, (2009). Curriculum: theories, approaches, and perspectives, Tehran: SAMT publication [Persian] Moaieri Mohammad taher, (1994). Education problems, Tehran: Amirkabir publication [Persian] NCTM, (2006). Math takes time: A position of the National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. Available on line at: http://www.nctm.org/uploadedfiles/About-NCTM.htm Nosrat Fatemeh, Yousefi Alireza, and Liyaghatdar Mohammad Javad, (2010). Effect of active and technological education of Physics on the academic achievement among students of higher school, Research in Curriculum Planning, Islamic Azad University, Khurasgan, Isfahan, Vol. 7, Continues no. 25, pp. 53-64 [Persian] Rahmani Mahdi, (2003). Math education: what are the goals of it? And what role it has on the development of Mathematics?, In proceedings of second conference on the math education, Kermanshah, pp. 138-143 [Persian] Reinhartz, J. & Beech, D. M. (1997). Teaching and learning in the elementary school: focus on curriculum, Prentice Hall. Russell, W.R. (1987). High school dropout, Journal of education research, Vol. 57, pp.101-121. Salsabili Nader, and Ghasemi Narjes, (2005). Factors effecting school failure: revisiting the internal and external agents, Quarterly journal of education, the institute for educational research ministry of education, Tehran, Vol. 21, No. 3 (continues no. 83), pp. 25-59 [Persian] Seals, J. R. (1991). Recommendation of standards for educational space for public school facilities, University of Texas at Austin. Shekaari Abbas, (2004). Education in Iran: problems and solutions, Tehran: Abed publication [Persian] Shokrkon Hossein, Pouladi Mohammad ali, and Haghighi Jamal, (2000). An Investigation on important causes of dropout in boys higher schools of Ahwaz, Quarterly journal of educational science, Chamran University of Ahwaz, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, pp. 103-114 [Persian] Sjosten- Bell. W. (2005). Influence of time-of-day on student performance on mathematical algorithms, division of education, Unpublished masters thesis, University of California. Sobhani Nejad Mehdi, and Zamani Manesh Hamed, (2012). Identifying Dimensions of Effective Teacher and Validating its Components by High School Teacher in Yasooj, Research in Curriculum Planning, Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan, Isfahan, Vol. 9, No. 5 (continues no. 32), pp. 68-81 [Persian] UNESCO, Regional office for Education in Asia and pacific (1987). Coping with dropout, Bangkok, pp. 1-10. Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educated Psychology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Zimmer- Gembek, M. J., Chipuer, H. M., Hanisch, M., Greed, P. & McGregor, L. (2006). Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement, Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 26, pp. 911-933. Zohrevand Razieh, (2010). Correlation of school-engagement with academic achievement and dropout attitude among secondary school students, Quarterly journal of education, the institute for educational research ministry of education, Tehran, Vol. 26, No. 2 (continues no. 102), pp. 50-69 [Persian].
_||_