ارزیابی مؤلفههای کارآفرینی در برنامه درسی تجربهشده دانشجویان دانشگاه کابل
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیمصطفی رضایی 1 , رحمت اله مرزوقی 2
1 - عضو هیئتعلمی دانشگاه کابل و کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
2 - استاد دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
کلید واژه: کارآفرینی, برنامه درسی تجربه شده, مؤلفه های کارآفرینی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف کلی پژوهش ارزیابی مؤلفههای کارآفرینی در برنامه درسی تجربهشده دانشجویان کارشناسی دانشگاه کابل در سال تحصیلی 93-92 بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش، دانشجویان سال آخر دوره کارشناسی دانشگاه کابل بود (4590 نفر). بر اساس فرمول کوکران 346 نفر بهعنوان نمونه به روش نمونهگیری طبقهای تصادفی بهینه شده انتخاب شدند. برای ارزیابی کارآفرینی در گام اول چارچوب کارآفرینی تدوین شد، در گام دوم بر اساس آن ابزار ارزیابی مؤلفههای کارآفرینی در برنامه درسی تجربهشده تحقیق ساخته شد. پایایی ابزار پژوهش با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ 88/0 بود. روایی ابزار مورد تأیید متخصصان قرار گرفت. در بخش آماری از میانگین، انحراف استاندارد و آزمون T تستها، تحلیل واریانس اندازهگیریهای مکرر و روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده گردید. که بهوسیله نرمافزار spss و lisrel پس از تحلیل دادهها یافتههای نشان داد که چارچوب کارآفرینی دارای اعتبار است. بعد غالب کارآفرینی در برنامهدرسی تجربهشده، مقوله موقعیتشناسی است. در کل وضعیت کارآفرینی از حد متوسط پایینتر بود. بین دانشجویان دختر و پسر تفاوتی وجود ندارد، اما بین کارآفرینی دانشجویان دانشکدههای مختلف تفاوت معنادار مشاهده میگردد. بیشترین مؤلفهای که در برنامه درسی تجربهشده شیوع شده، مؤلفة خلاقیت و نوآوری و کمترین آن مقوله کنترل درونی بود.
Abstract The goal of study was the evaluation of the entrepreneurship components in the experienced curriculum from perspectives of fourth year undergraduate students at Kabul university in the academic year of 2013-14. The statistical populations were the undergraduate students from the Kabul University (4590). The method of sampling was classified random sampling. 346 students were selected as a sample size on the basis Cochran formula and data were collected through researcher made questionnaire. The first step was to develop a conceptual framework for evaluating entrepreneurship components and in the second step the research tools were made based on that. The reliability of the instrument using Cronbach's alpha test was 88/0 and validity was confirmed by experts. In statistical part, mean, standard deviation, t-tests, repeated measures and Confirmatory factor analysis were used. Due to SPSS and LISREL software, data were analyzed. Research findings indicated that framework of the entrepreneurship is valid. The dominant aspect of perception entrepreneurship in the curriculum from the perspective of students was the component of “situation recognition”. The overall condition of perception of entrepreneurship was at an average level. Also the finding showed that there is no difference between perception of entrepreneurship in the experienced curriculum by male and female students, but there is a difference between the perceptions of entrepreneurship of students in various faculties. The most prevalent components in the experienced curriculum was the components of creativity and innovation, and the least was relevant the concept of internal control.
Akker, J.J.H. van den. (2003). “curriculum perspectives: an introduction”. in J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hemeyer (Eds). Curriculum Landscape and trends. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Adejimola AS, Olufunmilayo TO (2009).Spinning off an entrepreneurship culture among Nigerian university students: prospects and challenges. Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 3:80-88.
Ahmad Zadeh, N (2004). Evaluation of undergraduate science education according to students' entrepreneurship skills (case study: Shahid Beheshti University). [Persian].
Ahmadi H, Faraj Hosseini, J and Omidi Najaf-Abadi, M. (2009). Identify some of the factors associated with the promotion of entrepreneurship among students of the Graduate School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch of Tehran. Journal of Leadership and Educational Administration, second edition, pp. 9 - 24. [Persian].
Ali Miri, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship education: the creation, development, trends and challenges. Development of entrepreneurship, the first issue, pp. 133-169. [Persian].
Arabion, A., Rukn al-Din honorEftekhari, A. and Mrydsadat, M. (2010). Integrating sustainable entrepreneurship in agricultural policies necessary for the realization of Vision 1404. [Persian].
Avladyan, M, Saif Naraqi, M, Naderi, E and Shariatmadari, A. (2010). "Factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship from the perspective of the graduates of Tehran University in Tehran entrepreneurs and
managers in order to provide a suitable model curriculum orientation in educational sciences (Management and Planning School)". Journal of new ideas in Educational Sciences, 5(2). [Persian].
Badri, E., Lyaqtdar, MJ, Abdi, MR and parsley, E. (2005). "The capabilities of the entrepreneurial university". Journal of Higher Education programs, No. 40, pp. 90-39. [Persian].
Bodlaei, H. Zare, R (2013). Discourses the challenges and solutions in the theories of entrepreneurship. Tehran: Termeh. [Persian].
Brindley, C. (2005).“Barriers to women achieving their entrepreneurial potential: women and risk”.journal of women entrepreneurship. 11(2), 144-161.
Brown, T. H, Davidsson, P. &Wiklun, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management journal, 22, 953-968.
Brunner, Mark David. (2001). “Use of curriculum domains and subsystems”.
Brush, C. G. (2003).“Doctoral education in the Field of entrepreneurship”. Journal of management.Vol, 29, No. 3, 309-331.
Chambers, R. (2005).“Human capital for entrepreneurship in higher Education”. London: Edger.
Damuri, D. NejatiAjibshe, M. Monfared, sh. (2010). “Identifying and ranking motivations for entrepreneurship among female university students using a fuzzy topsis approach: case of female students of university of Yazd”.
Fairlie, R. W. & Holleran, W. (2011).“Entrepreneurship training, risk aversion and other personality traits: Evidence from a random experiment”. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 366-378.
Faoite. D, et al. (2003). “Education and training for entrepreneurs”. education + training, Vol 45 No. 8/9, 430-438.
Fathi Vajargah, K. Shafii, N. (2005). Quality of university curriculum, Journal of Research and Higher Education programs, No. 5, pp. 27-1. [Persian].
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2005). The autopsy a model curriculum in Iran in the field of research in Iran. The scope of the curriculum in the current situation and future prospects (Proceedings of the Association of Curriculum Studies). Tehran, Samt.
Fayolle, A. (2005). “Evaluation of entrepreneurship education: Scholarship-focused Outreach and Engagement”. Meet Michigan Orientation (May 10-21, 2005). Michigan State University.
Fuchs. K. Werner. A & wallau, F. (2008).“Entrepreneurship education in Germany and Sweden: What role do different school”.
Gelard, p. (2009).Family: Iranian women’s entrepreneurship development strategies.Woman in development and politics (Women’s research). 7(2(25)): pp. 131-149.
Histrich, R, Peters, M. and Dea, S, (2005). Entrepreneurship, MC Grow Hill, New York.
Jafarzadeh, M. (2004). "Explanation of a model for prediction of entrepreneurship". Thesis in the field of management, School of Management, Tehran University
Jones, C. &Enghish, J. (2004).“A Contemporary approach to Entrepreneurship Education”.Journal Education Training. 46. 416-423.
Keng neo & Lynda Wee. (2004) learning. International Journal of Technology Management Volume 28, Numbers 7-8.
Kousari, M, Norouzzadeh, R. (2009). The four defining characteristics of the undergraduate curriculum with an emphasis on entrepreneurship skills. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 54, pp. 18-1. [Persian].
Lounsbury, Michael. (2001). “Collective Entrepreneurship: the mobilization of college and university recycling coordinators”. Journal of Organizational change Management. Vol, 11, No. 1,5069.
Luen, Wong.Kee. (2008). “curriculum Gaps in Business Education: a Case study of Stakeholders Perceptions”. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Leicester.
Mehr Mohammadi, M (2011). Curriculum, approaches and perspectives. Sixth edition. Tehran: Razavi. [Persian].
Mohammadi, M. (2007). "The basic science and engineering curriculum, experiential satisfaction incoming students at Shiraz University", offer an explanatory model. Journal of Psychology Shahid Chamran University, 3(4), pp. 96-63. [Persian].
Moltege, L. (2012). Provide structural model of efficiency and competence development of their leadership curriculum experience of students at Shiraz University. MS Thesis, University of Shiraz. [Persian].
Momeni Mahmoei, H, Karami, M. and Timurid, S. (2011). "The students experienced curriculum BS degree in primary education", Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(1), pp. 80-65. [Persian].
Momenimahmoei, H. (2008). Planning, competency-based curriculum for elementary education degree. Thesis Course curriculum planning. Tehran, Tarbiat Modarres University. [Persian].
Okudan GE. And SE. Rzasa (2006).“A project-based Approach to Entrepreneurship leadership Education”. Journal of Technovation, vol, 26.
Peykarifard, F, Mahnegar, F. (2012). The Role of Universities in the development of entrepreneurship. National Conference on entrepreneurship, business management knowledge base.
Saif Naraqi, M and Avladyan, M. (2011). Compare graduates entrepreneurial attitude based on individual attributes and occupational variables and the factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship education in the curriculum Educational Sciences. Journal of Social Development in Iran, 2.
Shah Hosseini, A. (2009). Entrepreneurship in action. Tehran: Aeej. [Persian].
Sharifi, M, Moghadam, M and Mazbohi, S. (2011). "Entrepreneurship education curriculum: objectives, content, teaching methods and assessment methods". [Persian].
Smith, A. and Montgomery, A. (2008).”Values and hidden curriculum”. http//: Cain web service.
Souitaris, V. Zerbinati, S. Al-laham, A. (2007). “Do entrepreneurship programmers raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.22, No. 4, pp. 566-591.
Urbano, david.Aponte, marines & toledano, N (2008).“Doctoral education in entrepreneurship: a european case study”. Journal of small business and enterprise development.vol 15, no.2.
Waine& Bruce. (2003).“Definition of curriculum”. Faculty senate task force on curriculum.
Wilson, L. O. (2006). “Curriculum course”. ED 721 & 726, unpublished.
_||_