مدیریت «چرخه شایستگی» و برنامه ریزی آموزشی در دوره کارشناسی فناوری اطلاعات
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیفرهاد ابراهیم آبادی 1 , محبوبه عارفی 2 , کوروش فتحی واجارگاه 3 , جعفر توفیقی 4
1 - دکتری برنامهریزی درسی در آموزش عالی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3 - استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
4 - استاد گروه مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: مدیریت, مهندسی, شایستگی, فناوری اطلاعات,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش بررسی نحوه مدیریت شایستگی و نحوه برنامهریزی آموزشی در کارشناسی فناوری اطلاعات در کشورها یا حوزه های استحفاظی مختلف و مقایسه آن با وضعیت ایران بوده است. روش شناختی پژوهش حاضر، آمیخته از نوع به هم تنیده بوده و روش های تحقیق شامل بررسی اسنادی و روش زمینه یابی بوده است. در بررسی اسنادی، جامعه آماری شامل اسناد مرجع بینالمللی و ملی، مقالات و پژوهش های علمی بوده است. در روش زمینه یابی، که ابزارهای تحقیق شامل مصاحبة نیمهساختارمند، پرسشنامه و فن دلفی است جامعه و نمونه متناسب با هر ابزار تعیین شده است. یافته های پژوهش نشان داد که نوع برداشت از شایستگی بر مدیریت شایستگی و برنامه ریزی آموزشی تأثیر میگذارد. دیگر یافته ها نمایان ساختند که در حوزه مهندسی از جمله کارشناسی فناوری اطلاعات، شایستگی در طول چهار مرحله پرورش یافته، سنجیده شده و بسط می یابد که به چرخه شایستگی مهندسی شهرت دارد. در کشورها یا حوزه های استحفاظی مختلف، الگوهای تقریباً مشابهی برای استقرار صحیح چرخه شایستگی در مهندسی خصوصاً در حوزه فناوری اطلاعات ارائه شده است. همچنین یافته های پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که الگوی مناسبی برای مدیریت چرخه شایستگی کارشناسی فناوری اطلاعات در ایران وجود ندارد و چرخه مذکور بهدرستی استقرار نیافته است.
this study aimed to investigate managing “Competency” as well as educational program developing in Information Technology undergraduate at different countries or jurisdictions as well as comparison with its situation in Iran. The methodology of this study is Mixed-Intertwined-method and methods including Documentary Study and Survey. In the Documentary Study, the population includes international and national reference documents, articles and scientific researchs. In Survey that the research tools include semi-structired interview, questionnaire and Delphi thecniqu, the population and sample is determined according to the each tool. The results showed that the interpretation of competency impact on managing “competency” and educational program developing. Other findings indicated that in engineering field especially Information Technology, “Competency” will be developed, assessed, maintained and expanded during the four stages that is known “Engineering Competency Cycle”. In different countries or jurisdiction, almost similar models are be presented to appropriately establish “Competency Cycle” in engineering field especially Information Technology. Also, findings showed that in Iran a proper model has not for managing Competency Cycle in Information Technology undergraduate and this Cycle has not been properly established.
Abedi Ja’fari, H., Taslimi, M., Faghihi, A., Sheikhzade, M. (2011).Thematic Analysis and Thematic Networks: A Simple and Efficient Method for Exploring Patterns Embedded in Qualitative Data Municipalities). Strategic Management Thought, 5 (2), 151-198.
ABET. (2016). Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), www.abet.org
Ghanon Barnameh Panjome Toseh of Iran (2011-2016). Available from: www. Rc.majlis.ir.
Ahmadi, S., Yarmohamadian, M. H & Saadatmand, Z. (2013). Designing and developing a competency based curriculum model in Information Technology desciplin. (Ph.D. Thesis). Islamic Azad Universtiy, Isfahan (Khrasgan) Branch, Faculty of education (In Persian).
Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario. (2013). Guide to the required experience for licensing as a Professional Engineer in Ontario. http://www.peo.on.ca.
Augusti, G. (2009). EUR-ACE: the European Accreditation system of engineering education and its global context. In Engineering Education Quality Assurance (pp. 41-49). Springer US.
Castillo, J., Caruana, C. J., & Wainwright, D. (2011). The changing concept of competence and categorisation of learning outcomes in Europe: Implications for the design of higher education radiography curricula at the European level.Radiography, 17(3), 230-234.
CDIO. (2000). www.cdio.org. [Cited 2016].
Eaton, J. S. (2006). An Overview of US Accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). (2006). Recognition of Accrediting Organizations- Policy and Procedures. http:// www.chea.org
Ebrahimabadi, F., Arefi, M., Fathi vajargah, K. & Towfighi, J (2017). Educational Program Based on Competency and National Innovation System: Case study Information Technology. (Ph.D. Thesis). Shahid beheshti university, Faculty of education (In Persian).
ENQA, “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area”, 3rd Edition, 2009; www.enqa.eu [Publications; ESG] (accessed 27/05/2010).
European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE) (2016). Standards and Guidelines for Accreditation of Engineering Programmes. www.enaee.eu
Faiz, M & bahadori Nejad, M. (2010). Identifying appropriate professional competency of engineering graduates in Iran: case study gradutes of Sharif University, Ph.D thesis. [In Persian[
Gonczi, A., & Hager, P. (2010). The competency model. International encyclopedia of education, 8, 403-410.
Hanrahan, H. (2011). The Washington Accord Past, Present, Future.
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis. (2015) www.iupui.edu.
International Engineering Alliance. (1 January 2013). Agreement Recognising Comptence For Independent Practice.
International Engineering Alliance. (13 April 2015). Best Practice in Accreditation of Engineering Programs. http://www.ieagreements.org.
International Engineering Alliance. (15 September 2011). Glossary of Terms . http://www.ieagreements.org/
International Engineering Alliance. (21 June 2013). Graduate Attributions and professional competencies. Http: // www.ieagreements.org.
Lansu, A., Boon, J., Sloep, P. B., & van Dam-Mieras, R. (2013).Changing professional demands in sustainable regional development: a curriculum design process to meet transboundary competence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 123-13.
Lunt, B. M., Ekstrom, J. J., Gorka, S., Hislop, G., Kamali, R., Lawson, E,. & Reichgelt, H. (2008). Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information technology. Retrieved March, 2, 2009.
Memarian, H. (2013). Innovation in engineering education. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (2002). “Educational program of IT engineering undergraduate”.
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (2013). “Reviewed curriculum of computer engineering undergraduate”.
Mohamadi, R., Arefi, M., Bazargan, A., Pardakhtchi, M. H & Fathi vajargah, K. (2013). Designing a Model for Quality Audit and Feasibility study its implementionin University System of Iran. (Ph.D. Thesis). Shahid beheshti university, Faculty of education (In Persian).
New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2015). www.njit.edu.
Occupational Information Network. (2016). https://www.onetonline.org.
Rahdari, M., Nasr, A R., Nili, M. R., Tork Ladani B. (2015). Evaluating professional skills and employment status of baccalaureate's alumni in Information Technology Engineering. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 21 (2), 1-24
Ranjbar, H., haghdoost, A. A,. Salsali, M., Khoshdel, M., soleimani, M & bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: a guide for beginning. J army Univ Sci, 10 (3), 238-250.
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A & Hejazi, E. (2015). Research Methodology in Behavioral Sciences. Agah Press. [In Persian].
Seoul accord. (2016). www.seoulaccord.com.
Nagheshe Jame Elmi Keshvar. (2011). Available from http://en.farhangoelm.ir.
University of North Texas. (2015). http://www.unt.edu.
Yadegarzadeh, Gh., Fathi Vajargah, K., mehrmohamadi, M & Arefi, M. (2013). Designed and accreditation the job competencies of higher education curriculum specialists and evaluation doctoral curriculum. (Ph.D. Thesis). Shahid beheshti university, Faculty of education (In Persian).
_||_