طراحی مدل پویای مدیریت کسب و کارهای نوپا بر اساس پویاییشناسی سیستم
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت فناوری و اطلاعاتحمید عدل دوست 1 , محمود البرزی 2 , سید عبداله امین موسوی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: پویاییشناسی سیستم, کسب و کارهای نوپا, عوامل موفقیت و شکست, مدل کسب و کار ,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش ایجاد یک مدل پویاییشناسی سیستم، برای مدیریت دوره حیات کسب و کارهای نوپا -بر اساس عوامل شناسایی شده مؤثر در شکست و موفقیت این کسب و کارها و بررسی تأثیرات این عوامل در حلقههای مختلف است. روش این پژوهش در بخش شناسایی عوامل از نوع تئوری زمینه ای بوده و در بخش مدل سازی بر اساس پویاییشناسی سیستم میباشد. بر اساس مطالعات انجام شده، نرخ موفقیت کسب و کارهای نوپا (استارتآپ ها) در سراسر جهان بسیار پایین و طبق نتایج پژوهشها کمتر از 10 درصد میباشد. لذا شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت و شکست استارتآپها و استخراج یک مدل پویا از این عوامل، میتواند به مدیریت استارتآپها و افزایش احتمال موفقیت بینجامد. جهت استخراج عوامل شکست و موفقیت در این پژوهش، 25 مصاحبه با فعالان حوزه کسب و کارهای نوپا در تهران، در چهارچوب روش نظریه زمینهای ساخت گرا صورت پذیرفته است و پس از شناسایی عوامل مذکور شامل 87 مفهوم، 32 مقوله و 7 مقوله کلی، ابتدا نمودارهای علی-حلقوی در حوزههای مختلف ترسیم شده و سپس یک مدل بر اساس پویاییشناسی سیستم، شامل 13 متغیر حالت از عوامل مؤثر ایجاد گردیده است. مدل حاصل، با تستهای متعدد بررسی شده و نتایج نشان از امکان پیشبینی روند رشد و یا شکست استارتآپها از طریق مدلسازی و تعیین ضرایب مربوطه دارد.
The purpose of this research is to create a system dynamics model to manage the life cycle of start-up businesses based on the identified factors that are effective in the failure and success of these businesses and to examine the effects of these factors in different circles. The method of this research is grounded theory in the identification of factors and in the modeling part it is based on system dynamics. According to the studies, the success rate of startups around the world is very low, less than 10%. Therefore, identifying the factors affecting the success and failure of start-ups and designing a dynamic model based on these factors can lead to the management of start-ups and increase the probability of success. In order to extract failure and success factors in this research, 25 interviews were conducted with the activists of start-up businesses in Tehran, within the framework of the constructionist grounded theory method. The identified factors included 87 concepts, 32 categories and 7 general categories. To design the model, first, causal loops diagrams were drawn in different areas and then a model, based on system dynamics, was designed which included 13 stocks of effective factors. The resulting model was checked with numerous tests, the results of which revealed the possibility of predicting the growth or failure of startups through modeling and determining the relevant coefficients.
A., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A Krishna. (2016). Predicting the Outcome of Startups: Less Failure, More Succes. IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 798-805. doi:10.1109/ICDMW.2016.0118
Anh, D., Hoa, Q. & Quoc, T. (2012). Critical success factors for Vietnamese software companies: A framework for investigation. Journal of Sociological Research, (2)3, 160-169. doi:10.5296/jsr.v3i2.2307
Anna Klabunde.(2015). How Much Should an Investor Trust the Startup Entrepreneur? - A Network Model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination. 11(2), 293-312. doi:10.1007/s11403-015-0147-7
Arto Wallin، Kaisa Still، و Katja Henttonen. (2016). Entrepreneurial Growth Ambitions: The Case of Finnish Technology Startups. Technology Innovation Management Review. 6(10), 5-16. doi:10.22215/timreview/1023
Chuthamas Chittithaworn، Md. Aminul Islam، Thiyada Keawchana، Dayang Hasliza، و Dayang Hasliza Muhd Yusuf. (2011). Factors Affecting Business Success of Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand. Asian Journal of Social Science, 7(5),180-190. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n5p180
Daniel Cockayne. (2019) What is a startup firm? A methodological and epistemological investigation into research. Elsevier, 107, 77-87. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.009
Erik Stavnsager Rasmussen، و Stoyan Tanev. (2015). The emergence of the lean global startup as a new type of firm. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(11), 12-19. doi:10.22215/timreview/941
Haiyang Li. (2001). How does new venture strategy matter in the environment–performance relationship? The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2),183-204. doi:10.1016/S1047-8310(01)00036-0
Hormiga, E., Batista-Canino, R. & Sánchez-Medina, A. (2010) . The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures. International Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 7(1) 1-22. doi:10.1007/s11365-010-0139-y
J Lee. (2001). Grounded Theory: Integration and Internalization in ERP Adoption and Use, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Nebreska, In Proquest UMI Database. Url: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280150284_A_grounded_theory_Integration_and_internalization_in_ERP_adoption_and_use
J Mohr، S Sengupta، و S Slater. (2010). Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations, 3rd Edition. New Jersey, Upper Saddle River, USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Url, 1-576. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233894918_Marketing_High_Technology_Products_and_Innovations
Jane Mills, Ann Bonner, Karen Francis. (2006). The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. International Journal Of Qualitative Method, 5(1), 26-35 Url: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 232272017_The_Development_of_Constructivist_Grounded_Theory
John Sterman. (2000). Business Dynamics, System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill Education, 1-1008. Url: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44827001_Business_Dynamics_System_Thinking_and_Modeling_for_a_Complex_World
John T. Gourville. (2006). Eager Sellers and Stony Buyers: Understanding the Psychology of New-Product Adoption. Harvard Business Review, 84(6),98-106.Url:https://hbr.org/2006/06/eager-sellers-and-stony buyers- understanding-the-psychology-of-new-product-adoption
José Santisteban & David Mauricio. (2017). Systematic literature review of critical success factors of Information Technology startups. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(2), 1-23. Url: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/322094432_Systematic_literature_review_of_critical_success_factors_of_Information_Technology_startups
K Charmaz. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sag, 1-208.. Url: http://www.sxf.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Charmaz_2006.pdf
Kelly Carvalho Vieira، José Willer do Prado، Valderí de Castro Alcântara، Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo. (2015). External Sources in the process of Open Innovation: Reinforcing and Restrictive Factors in Tech Startups. Journal on Innovation, 6(3), 3-28. doi:10.24212/2179-3565.2015v6i3p3-28
L Yoon-Jun. (2010). Technology strategy by growth stage of technology-based venture companies. International, 6(6), 216-234. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2021.114266
Leitão, A., Cunha, P., Valente, F., Marques, P. (2013). Roadmap for business models definition in manufacturing companies. Forty Sixth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 7, 383-388. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.003
M., Mendes, E., Urquhart, C., Riaz, M. & Tempero, E Sulayman. (2014). Towards a theoretical framework of SPI success factors for small and medium web companies. Information and Software Technology, 56(7), 807-820. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.006
M., Strielkowski, W. & Cabelkova, I Krejci. (2015). Factors that influence the success of small and medium. Business: Theory and Practic, 16(2), 304-315. DOI:10.3846/btp.2015.521
Makizadeh. V, Sharaei. F, (2021) An Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Foresight on Innovation in Startups, Journal of future studies management, 33(4), 16-27. [In Persian]. Url: https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/784073
M.S Martis. (2006). Validation of simulation based models: a theoretical outlook. electronic journal of businessresearch method, 4(1), 39-46. Url: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228635381_Validation _of_simulation_based_models_A_theoretical_outlook
Mike Simpson، Joanne Padmore، و Nicki Newman. (2012). Towards a new model of success and performance in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(3), 264-285doi:10.1108/13552551211227675
Mirzaee. Y, Mahmoudi Maymand.M, Rajabzadeh. A, Samiei Nasr. M, Conceptualization of business excellence model with a grand theory approach. (2020), Journal of future studies (103-116) [In Persian] doi:10.22034/IJHCUM.2019.03.02
Moayya.A, Otarkhani. A, Rezaeian. A, Hajipour. B, (2022) Identifying drivers of Business Model Innovation, Journal of IT Management Studies, 10(40), 201-231. [In Persian] doi: 10.22054/ims.2022.67710.2167
Monica Zimmerman، و Hung Manh Chu. (2013). otivation, Success, and Problems of Entrepreneurs in Venezuela. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14, 76-90. Url: https://www.semanticscholar.org/ paper /MOTIVATION%2C-SUCCESS%2C-AND-PROBLEMS-OF-ENTREPRENEURS-Zimmerman Chu/902a0fab12595be4d6e621b60 daa623cd331d664
Mueller, S., Volery, T. & Von, B. (2012). What do entrepreneurs actually do? An observational study of entrepreneurs’ everyday behavior in the start-up and growth stages. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 995-1017. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00538.x
N.M.P. Bocken. (2015). Sustainable venture capital e catalyst for sustainable start-up success. Journal of Cleaner Production,108, 647-658 doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.079
Nadafi. R, Ahmadvand M, (2017) Identification and Prioritization of Development Factors of Startups Using Q methodology. Journal Of Entrepreneurship development., 10(3), 517-534. [In Persian] doi:10.22059/jed.2018.236443.652249
Ng, A., Macbeth, D. & Southern, G. (2014). Entrepreneurial performance of early-stage ventures: Dynamic resource management for development and growth. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 10(3), 1-19. doi:10.1007/s11365-014-0303-x
Pirolo, L. & Presutti, M. (2010). The impact of social capital on the start-ups’ performance growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 197-227. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00292.x
R., Bortoluzzi, G. & Zupic, I Pugliese. (2016). Putting process on track: Empirical research on start-ups’ growth drivers. Management Decision, 54(7), 1633-1648. doi:10.1108/MD-10-2015-0444
S. & Lussier, R Hyder. (2016). Why businesses succeed or fail: A study on small businesses in Pakistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economics, 8(1), 82-100. doi:10.1108/JEEE-03-2015-0020
Spiegel, O., Abbassi, P., Zylka, P., Schlagwein, D., Fischbach, K. & Schoder, D. (2015). Business model development, founders’ social capital and the success of early stage internet start-ups: A mixed-method study. Information Systems Journal, 26(5), 1-30 . doi:10.1111/isj.12073
Spyros J. Vliamos, Nickolaos G. Tzeremes. (2012). Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Process and Firm Start-Ups: Evidence from Central Greece. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(3), 250-264. doi:10.1007/s13132-011-0043-x
Tari.G, Porhelm. H, (2020) Structural Model of Factors Affecting Survival and Growth of Startups in Iran, Journal of Executive Management, 12(23), 315-341. [In Persian] doi: 10.22080/jem.2020.17998.3096
Wing-Ki, W. Hong-Man, C. & Venuvinod, P. (2005). Assessing the growth potential of high-technology startups: An exploratory study from Hong Kong. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 18(4), 453-470 doi:10.1080/08276331.2005.10593353
Y. Barlas. (1989). Tests of Model Behavior that can Detect Structural Flaws: Demonstration with Simulation Experiments. Computer-Based Management of Complex Systems, 246-254. Url: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-74946-9_24
Z., Zandi, F. and Bahmani, N Arasti. (2014). Arasti, Z., Zandi, F. and Bahmani, N., 2014. Business failure factors in Iranian SMEs: Do successful and unsuccessful entrepreneurs have different viewpoints. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 4(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s40497-014-0010-7