کارایی هزینه در فرایند سه مرحله ای شبکه DEA-R
محورهای موضوعی : آمار
پریسا کامیاب
1
,
محمدرضا مظفری
2
1 - گروه ریاضی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
2 - گروه ریاضی، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران
کلید واژه: network DEA-R, Data Envelopment Analysis, cost efficiency,
چکیده مقاله :
در بسیاری از سازمانها و موسسات مالی همواره داده های ورودی و خروجی در دسترس نمی باشند، بلکه فقط نسبتی از ورودیها به خروجی ها( یا بالعکس) در دسترس می باشد. در تحلیل پوششی داده ها کارایی هزینه باتوجه به بردار هزینه ورودیاا استاندارد ورودیها را مشخص می کند. در فرایند چندمرحله ای شبکه تحلیل پوششی داده ها نیز بحث کارایی هزینه علاوه بر استاندارد ورودی، استاندارد بردارهای میانی را بااستقاده از مدلهای برنامه ریزی خطی مشخص می کند. در این مقاله براساس مجموعه امکان تولید در فرایندهای سه مرحله ای شبکه DEA-R ابتدا مقیاس کارایی در هر مرحله و کارایی کلی محاسبه میشود. سپس فرایند سه مرحله ای شبکه DEA-Rکه تلفیقی از تحلیل پوششی داده ها و داده های نسبتی است پیشنهاد میشود. بااستفاده از بحث کارایی هزینه استاندارد وروریها و پیوندهای میانی در هرمرحله مشخص میشود. در خاتمه، کارایی کلی و کارایی هزینه برای ۳۰ مرکز اموزشی و تحقیقاتی در ایران مربوط به شش ماهه اول ۲۰۱۵ بر اساس فرایند سه مرحله ای شبکه DEA-R بررسی میشود.
In many organizations and financial institutions, we don't always have acsses to inputs and outputs to evaluate the decision-making units (DMUs), but rather only a ratio of inputs to outputs ( or reverse) might be available. In DEA, cost efficiency determines input standards based on input costs. In multi-stage network DEA processes, in addition to input standards, cost efficiency would determine the standards for intermediate vectors as well as using linear programming models. In this paper, we calculated efficiency values for each stage, as well as overall efficiency based on a proxuction possibility set (PPS) in three stage network DEA-R processes. Then, we suggest three stage network DEA-R (ratio-based DEA midel) processes which are a combination of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and ratio data then we will propose cost efficiency models in each three stage network DEA-R process. Afterthan, we will determine the standards for outputs and intermediate measures in each stage using the subject of cost efficiency . In the end, overall efficiency and cost efficiency will be evaluated among of 30 Iranian educational research centers during the first half- year of 2015 based on a three stage network DEA-R process.
[1] Athanassapoulos, AD. Nonparametric frontier models for assessing market and cot efficiency of large scale bank branch networks. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, (1998). 30: 172-192.
[2] Avkiran, N. k. Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: An illustration with UAE banks. Omega, (2009). 37, 930-941.
[3] Banker, RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in DEA. Measurement Science, (1984). 30:1078-92.
[4] Charnes, A, Cooper, WW, Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, (1978). 2:429-44.
[5] Casteli, L. Pesenti, R,. & Ukovich, W. A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of decision making units is considered. Annals of Operations Research, (2010). 173, 207-235.
[6] Chen, C. M. A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production netwoks. European Journal of Operational Research, (2009). 194, 687-699.
[7] Cooper, W. W., Seiford, LM, Zhu, J. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. Boston: Springer. (2011).
[8] Despic, O., Despic, M., & Paradi, J, C. DEA-R: Rattio-based comparative efficiency model. Its mathematical relation to DEA and its use application. Journal of Productivity Analysis, (2007). 28(1), 33-44.
[9] Dong, Y, Zhe., Hamilton, R., Tippett , Mark. Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: A comparsion of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis. (2014).
[10] Du, J., Liang L., Chen, Y., Bi GB. DEA based production planning. Omega. (2010). 38:105-12.
[11] Ebrahimnejad, A. Tavana, M., Hosseinzadeh L, F., Shahverdi, R., Yousefpour, M. A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry, (2014). 49, 308-319.
[12] Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, (1996a). 50, 65-70.
[13] Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. Intertemporal production frontiers: With dynamic DEA. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (1996b).
[14] Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, (2000). 34, 35-49.
[15] Farrell, M. J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, (1957). 120, 253-281.
[16] Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Shahverdi, R., Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., Cost efficiency and Malmquist productivity index with interval data. International Mathmatical Forum, (2007), 2, no. 9, 441-453.
[17] Kao, C. Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, (2009b). 196, 1107-1112.
[18] Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, (2008), 185, 418-429.
[19] Kao, C. Efficiency decomposition for general multi-stage system in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. (2014). 232: 117-124.
[20] Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computer and Operations Research, (2004a). 31, 1365-1410.
[21] Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics. (2008). 55, 643-653.
[22] Lozano, S. Scale and cost efficiency analysis of network of processes, Expert System With Application, (2011). 38, 6612-6617.
[23] Lothgren, M., & Tambour, M. Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research, (1999). 115, 449-458
[24] Mollaeian, E., Rostamy-malkhalifeh, Evaluating performance supply chain by a new non-radial network DEA model with fuzzy data. Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision. (2012). Volume 2012.
[25] Nikfarjam, H., Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., Mamizadeh-Chatghayeh, S., Measuring supply chain efficiency based on a hybrid approach. Transportation Research Part D. (2015), 39, 141-150.
[26] Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., Aghayi, N., Measurig overall profit efficiency with fuzzy data, Journal of Mathematical Extension. (2011), Vol. 5, No. 2(2), 73-90.
[27] Sexton, T. R., Lewis, H. F. Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, (2003). 19, 227-249.
[28] Sieford, LM., Zhu. J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial bankes. Management Science. (1999). 45:1270-88.
[29] Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. Network DEA: A slack-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, (2009). 197, 243-252.
[30] Tone, K., Tsutui, M. Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slack-based measure approach. Omega. (2014). 42(1), 124-131.
[31] Yu, MM. Assessment of airport performance using the SBM-NDEA model. Omega. (2010). 38:440-52.
[32] Zhong W. Yuan W, Li SX, Huang ZM. The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in china: an application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data. Omega. (2011). 39:447-55.
[33] Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Chai, J., Wang, L., Wang, Sh., & Lev, B., Sustainable supply chain evaluation: A dynamic double frontier network DEA model with interval type-2 fuzzy data, (2019).