تحلیل بیبلیومتریک و روند تماتیک پژوهش‌های حوزه سرمایه‌گذاران فرشته: روندها، شبکه‌ها و شکاف‌های تحقیقاتی
محورهای موضوعی : آینده پژوهیآصف کریمی 1 * , میثم شفیعی رودپشتی 2 , محمد صادق خیاطیان 3 , یاسر عرب نیا 4
1 - دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران
2 - دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران
3 - پژوهشکده علم و فناوری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
4 - دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران ، تهران ، ایران
کلید واژه: سرمایه‌گذاران فرشته, استارتاپ‌ها, اکوسیستم کارآفرینی, تصمیم‌گیری سرمایه‌گذاری, تأمین مالی استارتاپ‌ها,
چکیده مقاله :
سرمایه‌گذاران فرشته به‌عنوان یکی از ارکان کلیدی تأمین مالی استارتاپ‌ها در مراحل اولیه، نقش مهمی در توسعه اکوسیستم‌های کارآفرینی ایفا می‌کنند. این پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از رویکرد بیبلیومتریک، به بررسی جامع پژوهش‌های علمی مرتبط با سرمایه‌گذاران فرشته پرداخته است. داده‌های این پژوهش از پایگاه استنادی Web of Science استخراج شده و 541 مقاله منتشر شده بین سال‌های 2000 تا 2024 مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته‌اند. تحلیل‌های توصیفی و شبکه‌ای نشان می‌دهد که بیشترین تمرکز پژوهش‌ها در کشورهای توسعه‌یافته‌ای نظیر ایالات متحده و بریتانیا بوده و دانشگاه‌های پیشرو در این کشورها سهم عمده‌ای در تولید دانش این حوزه داشته‌اند. علاوه بر این، تحلیل تماتیک پژوهش‌ها نشان داد که موضوعاتی نظیر تصمیم‌گیری، ارزیابی ریسک، و شبکه‌سازی از مهم‌ترین محورهای تحقیقاتی هستند. در عین حال، موضوعاتی نظیر اثرات اجتماعی سرمایه‌گذاری فرشته و استفاده از فناوری‌های نوظهور در این حوزه به‌عنوان تم‌های نوظهور شناسایی شدند. این مطالعه با ارائه تصویری جامع از روندهای تاریخی، شبکه‌های همکاری و شکاف‌های موجود در ادبیات، می‌تواند راهنمایی ارزشمند برای پژوهشگران و سیاست‌گذاران در تقویت نقش سرمایه‌گذاران فرشته در توسعه نوآوری و کارآفرینی باشد. نتایج این پژوهش به شناسایی فرصت‌های تحقیقاتی آینده و طراحی سیاست‌های حمایتی مؤثر کمک می‌کند.
Angel investors constitute a critical component of early-stage startup financing and play an essential role in developing entrepreneurial ecosystems. This study adopts a bibliometric methodology to conduct a comprehensive analysis of scholarly research about angel investors. Data were collected from the Web of Science database, encompassing 541 articles published between 2000 and 2024. Descriptive and network analyses reveal that scholarly attention has been predominantly concentrated in developed economies such as the United States and the United Kingdom, with leading academic institutions in these countries making substantial contributions to the advancement of knowledge in this field. Thematic analysis further indicates that key research foci include decision-making processes, risk evaluation, and networking activities. Simultaneously, themes such as the social impact of angel investments and the application of emerging technologies are identified as burgeoning areas of inquiry. By presenting a comprehensive depiction of historical developments, collaboration patterns, and existing gaps within the literature, this study provides valuable insights for researchers and policymakers aiming to strengthen the role of angel investors in promoting innovation and entrepreneurship. The findings offer strategic guidance for future research endeavors and inform the design of effective support policies.
Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39(4), 955-980.
Altmeier, A., & Fisch, C. (2024). The relationship between business angels’ psychological attributes and investments in successful portfolio ventures: an empirical investigation using Twitter data. British journal of management, 35(2), 629-643.
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Apergis, E. (2024). Fallen Angels and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from US Firms. International journal of the Economics of Business, 1-27.
Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1373-1390.
Arundale, K., & Mason, C. (2025). Business angel groups as collective action: an examination of the due diligence process. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 1-24.
Barth, J. R., Lin, C., Lin, P., & Song, F. M. (2009). Corruption in bank lending to firms: Cross-country micro evidence on the beneficial role of competition and information sharing. Journal of financial economics, 91(3), 361-388.
Becker-Blease, J. R., & Sohl, J. E. (2007). Do women-owned businesses have equal access to angel capital? Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 503-521.
Berger, M., & Gottschalk, S. (2025). Amplifying angels: Evidence from the INVEST program. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(1), 106456.
Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. (2001a). Environmental regulation and labor demand: Evidence from the south coast air basin. Journal of Public Economics, 79(2), 265-295.
Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. (2001b). Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. Review of economics and statistics, 83(3), 498-510.
Bruton, G. D., Filatotchev, I., Chahine, S., & Wright, M. (2010). Governance, ownership structure, and performance of IPO firms: The impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 491-509.
Carpentier, C., & Suret, J.-M. (2015). Angel group members' decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 808-821.
Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., Dell'Era, C., & Pellizzoni, E. (2019). Fostering digital entrepreneurship from startup to scaleup: The role of venture capital funds and angel groups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 24-35.
Curado, M., Rodriguez, R., Tortosa, L., & Vicent, J. F. (2022). Anew centrality measure in dense networks based on two-way random walk betweenness. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 412, 126560.
Ding, Z., Sun, S. L., & Au, K. (2014). Angel investors’ selection criteria: A comparative institutional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31, 705-731.
Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820-1853.
Elitzur, R., & Gavious, A. (2003). Contracting, signaling, and moral hazard: a model of entrepreneurs,‘angels,’and venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 709-725.
Feeney, L., Haines Jr, G. H., & Riding, A. L. (1999). Private investors' investment criteria: insights from qualitative data. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 1(2), 121-145.
Freear, J., Sohl, J. E., & Wetzel Jr, W. E. (1994). Angels and non-angels: are there differences? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(2), 109-123.
Gandasari, D., Tjahjana, D., Dwidienawati, D., & Sugiarto, M. (2024). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of social network analysis research on Scopus databases and VOSviewer. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2376899.
Hegeman, P. D., Sørheim, R., Landström, H., & Saether, E. A. (2024). Corporate angels: A new breed of investors in the funding landscape for technology-based start-ups. Technovation, 134, 103016.
Herron, L., & Robinson Jr, R. B. (1993). A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 281-294.
Huang, L., & Pearce, J. L. (2015). Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Administrative science quarterly, 60(4), 634-670.
Kaiser, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2025). Emotions and entrepreneurial finance: Analysis of venture capitalists’ and business angels’ digital footprints on Twitter. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 35.
Kerr, W. R., Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2014). The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: Evidence from angel financings. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 20-55.
Mason, C., Botelho, T., & Harrison, R. (2019). The changing nature of angel investing: some research implications. Venture Capital, 21(2-3), 177-194.
Mason, C., & Stark, M. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227-248.
Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (1996). Informal venture capital: a study of the investment process, the post-investment experience and investment performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 8(2), 105-126.
Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2002). Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 211-236.
Maxwell, A. L., Jeffrey, S. A., & Lévesque, M. (2011). Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 212-225.
Mitteness, C., Sudek, R., & Cardon, M. S. (2012). Angel investor characteristics that determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 592-606.
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd‐funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443-470.
Osnabrugge, M. V., & Robinson, R. J. (2000). Angel investing: Matching start-up funds with start-up companies: The guide for entrepreneurs, individual investors, and venture capitalists. San Francisco.
Parhankangas, A., & Ehrlich, M. (2014). How entrepreneurs seduce business angels: An impression management approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 543-564.
Patel, M. S., Franceschelli, D., Grossbach, A., Zhang, J. K., Mercier, P. A., & Mattei, T. A. (2024). Top 50 spine surgery publications most cited by patents: a bibliometric analysis focused on research driving innovation. World Neurosurgery.
Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2018). Human capital signals and entrepreneurs’ success in equity crowdfunding. Small business economics, 51, 667-686.
Politis, D. (2008). Business angels and value added: what do we know and where do we go? Venture Capital, 10(2), 127-147.
Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., Conde-González, M. Á., & Hernández-García, Á. (2024). Social network analysis: a primer, a guide and a tutorial in R. Learning analytics methods and tutorials: a practical guide using R, 491-518.
Siefkes, M. (2025). A guide to becoming green: Insights from angel investors developing sustainability-specific knowledge. Journal of Small Business Management, 63(1), 306-336.
Siefkes, M., Bjørgum, Ø., & Sørheim, R. (2025). Business angels investing in green ventures: how do they add value to their start-ups? Venture Capital, 27(1), 79-108.
Singh, S. S., Muhuri, S., Mishra, S., Srivastava, D., Shakya, H. K., & Kumar, N. (2024). Social Network Analysis: A Survey on Process, Tools, and Application. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(8), 1-39.
Solodoha, E., Rosenzweig, S., & Harel, S. (2023). Incentivizing angels to invest in start-ups: Evidence from a natural experiment. Research Policy, 52(1), 104634.
Steier, L., & Greenwood, R. (2000). Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. Organization studies, 21(1), 163-192.
Van Osnabrugge, M. (2000). A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: an agency theory-based analysis. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 2(2), 91-109.
Viglialoro, D., Botelho, T., Ughetto, E., Laspia, A., & Landoni, P. (2024). Social Impact Business Angels as New Impact Investors. British journal of management.
Wetzel Jr, W. E. (1983). Angels and informal risk capital. Sloan Management Review (pre-1986), 24(4), 23.
Wiltbank, R., Read, S., Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2009). Prediction and control under uncertainty: Outcomes in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 116-133.
Zhong, Z., Guo, H., & Qian, K. (2024). Deciphering the impact of machine learning on education: Insights from a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-package. Education and Information Technologies, 1-28.