Integrating Statistical Quality Control and Root-Cause Analysis in Marble Manufacturing for Sustainable Process Improvement
Subject Areas : Statistical Quality Control
Nurhayati Rauf
1
*
,
Ahmad Padhil
2
1 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Muslim University of Indonesia, Makassar, Indonesia
2 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Muslim University of Indonesia, Makassar, Indonesia
Keywords: Statistical Quality Control, Marble manufacturing, Defect analysis, P-chart, Fishbone diagram, Sustainable production, Predictive maintenance. ,
Abstract :
The marble manufacturing industry often faces quality control challenges due to the natural variability of raw materials and inconsistencies in human-machine interactions. These issues can result in high defect rates, production inefficiencies, and customer dissatisfaction. Therefore, a systematic and data-driven approach is essential to monitor, evaluate, and improve product quality. This study aims to analyze the quality performance of marble tile production by identifying dominant defect types and assessing process stability using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) techniques. Specifically, the research applies Pareto analysis to determine the most frequent defect categories and constructs a p-chart to evaluate the temporal variation in defect proportions over time. The methodology involved daily defect recording over 30 production days, resulting in a dataset of 16,015 marble units. Defect categories included cracks, breaks, discoloration, chipping, and misalignment. Pareto analysis revealed that over 99% of all defects were concentrated in cracks and breaks, confirming the effectiveness of prioritizing these two categories for corrective action. Meanwhile, the p-chart indicated a process mean (CL) of 0.10607, with control limits at 0.11343 (UCL) and 0.09871 (LCL). Of the 30 observations, 27 were within control limits, suggesting the presence of common-cause variation. However, three outlier points on Days 7, 15, and 24 exceeded the UCL, signaling assignable causes. These anomalies coincided with peak equipment usage and unexpected operator reassignments, highlighting the interplay of technical and human factors. The findings, supported by visual representation in Figure 3, suggest that while the process is generally stable, it is vulnerable to short-term disruptions. Implementing predictive maintenance and ergonomic scheduling is recommended to enhance long-term process capability and product consistency.
[1] Sariisik, G. (2012) ‘Determining performance of marble finished products on their usage areas by a new impact-resistance test method’, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40(5), pp. 799–805. DOI: 10.1520/JTE104014.
[2] Kelesoglu, M.K. and Aydin, A. (2019) ‘Performance of Turkish marbles in building applications: durability and dimensional accuracy’, Construction and Building Materials, 221, pp. 251–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.013.
[3] Karaca, Z., Demirci, M., Uçak, N. and Işik, Y. (2020) ‘Influence of cutting parameters on marble kerf and specific energy in gang saw cutting’, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 133, article 104373. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104373.
[4] Tsarouhas, P. (2019) ‘Application of SPC and Pareto analysis for quality improvement in a bakery line: a case study’, Journal of Food Process Engineering, 42(4), article e12993. DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12993.
[5] Jadhav, P. and Mane, R. (2021) ‘Reducing casting defects using statistical quality control and root cause analysis’, Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, pp. 5187–5191. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.442.
[6] Al‐Najjar, B. (2016) ‘Quality tools implementation in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): a case study’, TQM Journal, 28(1), pp. 89–105. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-03-2014-0035.
[7] Breyfogle, F.W. (2003) Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
[8] Sahoo, C. and Yadav, S. (2018) ‘Quality management practices and firm performance: a study of Indian manufacturing SMEs’, Benchmarking, 25(9), pp. 3846–3866. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2017-0042.
[9] Montgomery, D.C. (2012) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
[10] Woodall, W.H. (2000) ‘Controversies and contradictions in statistical process control’, Journal of Quality Technology, 32(4), pp. 341–350. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2000.11980091.
[11] Rauf, N., Padhil, A. and Yulyanda, A., 2023. Analysis of the influence of price and product performance, on the decision of heavy equipment customer buying excavator products ABC PT. XYZ. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 1(1), p.141.
[12] Chan, L.K.Y. and Spedding, T.A. (2001) ‘An integrated statistical process control expert system’, Expert Systems with Applications, 21(1), pp. 59–73. DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00054-2.
[13] Antony, J. (2011) ‘Six Sigma vs Lean: Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners’, International Journal of Production Research, 49(23), pp. 5675–5688. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.571940.
[14] Aydin, A. (2007) ‘Some engineering problems in rock mechanics with special reference to natural stones’, Engineering Geology, 90(1–2), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.005.
[15] Montgomery, D.C. and Runger, G.C. (2013) Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. 6th ed. New York: Wiley.
[16] Shankar, R. and Singh, R. (2020) ‘Integrated quality tools application in defect analysis’, TQM Journal, 32(3), pp. 587–603. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0072.
[17] Padhil, A., Purnomo, H., Soewardi, H. and Widodo, I.D., 2024. Opportunities for the Development of Safety and Health Protection Systems in the Small and Medium Enterprise (SMEs) Sector. International Journal of Safety & Security Engineering, 14(2).
[18] Lee, K. and Sohn, Y. (2018) ‘Outlier detection in thin-film defect analysis using multivariate control charts’, Quality Engineering, 30(4), pp. 530–543. DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2018.1428203.
[19] Pinto, L. and Salgueiro, J. (2019) ‘Ambient variations and tool wear as leading indicators of quality deviations: a case from printed electronics’, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(3), article 031004. DOI: 10.1115/1.4042266.
[20] Mukherjee, A., Das, D. and Singh, R. (2022) ‘Application of SQC and root cause analysis in granite slab polishing’, Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, pp. 1945–1953. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.129.
[21] Hossain, M., Gopsill, J. and Hicks, B. (2021) ‘Cognitive ergonomics in additive manufacturing: a study of operator influence’, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 115(1), pp. 233–247. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07118-6.
[22] Kumar, P. and Gupta, R.K. (2021) ‘Process capability analysis for quality improvement in manufacturing’, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(4), pp. 712–725. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-05-2020-0195.
[23] Tsai, P.L. and Wang, W. (2021) ‘Integrating sensor-based monitoring and quality control in smart manufacturing’, Sensors, 21(11), article 3654. DOI: 10.3390/s21113654.
[24] Devik, R., Østli, E. and Fossdal, S. (2020) ‘Predictive quality in manufacturing using machine learning: a review’, Procedia CIRP, 93, pp. 745–750. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.124.
[25] Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E. and Mazzuto, G. (2021) ‘Integration of sustainability and quality management systems: a framework for continuous improvement’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, article 123958. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123958.