Supervisory Strategies in Core Reflection-driven Discussions for EFL Teachers’ Professional Development
DOR: 20.1001.1.23223898.2021.9.36.3.9

Subject Areas :

Neda Ashraafi ¹ , Mohammadreza Talebinejad ² , Mohsen Shahrokhi ³

1 - English Department, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
2 - English Department, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
3 - English Department, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran

Received: 2020-06-09 Accepted : 2020-10-25 Published : 2021-07-01

Keywords: Supervision, supervisor, reflective teaching, Core reflection, language teacher development, onion model,

Abstract :

Forty general English teachers at the university level attended three supervisory sessions. The qualitative data were collected through a triangulation of various techniques, including: pre/post-supervision semi-structured interviews, classroom observation checklists, reflective journals, field notes, and transcriptions of audio-recorded data from supervisory meetings. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes at each layer of the onion model. The Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference between teachers’ attitudes and strategies before and after the supervisory meetings. The results demonstrated that teachers experienced a process of growth with a developmental trajectory from the outer layers to the inner layers of the onion model fostering the core qualities of self-confidence, self-efficacy, self-awareness, and autonomy. Furthermore, the analysis indicated that the supervisor played a significant role in teachers’ development by using supervisory strategies such as: empathetic listening and accepting the problems, empowerment by activating core qualities, giving attention to inner obstacles, giving balanced attention to cognition, emotion, and motivation, and help to get autonomy in core reflection. The findings support making deliberate efforts to establish regular supervisory practicum meetings as part of academic professional culture, and the core reflection approach as a valuable strategy.

References:

Adams, R., Kim, Y. M., & Greene, W. L. (2013). Actualizing core strengths in new teacher development. In F. A. J. Korthagen, Y. M. Kim, & W. L. Greene (Eds.), Teaching and learning from within: A core reflection approach to quality and inspiration in education (pp. 61–75). New York: Routledge.

Boniwell, I. (2012). Positive psychology in a nutshell: The science of happiness. Maidenhead, U.K.: Open University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Clarke, V. & Braun, V. (2014) Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1947-1952). New York: Springer.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66, 46-53.

Dewaele, J. M., Chen, X., Padilla, A. M., & Lake, J. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign/second language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2128.

Dewey, J. (1993). How we think: a re-statement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process. DC. Heath, & Co, Boston.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoekstra, A., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (2011). Teacher learning in a context of educational change: Informal learning versus systematic support. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 76–92.

Impedovo, M. A., & Malik, S. K. (2016). Becoming a Reflective In-Service Teacher: Role of Research Attitude. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 6.

Khazaeenezhad, B., Tavakoli, M., & Amirian, Z. (2018). Core Reflection as a Way Towards Integrating Theoretical Knowledge and Pedagogical Practice in the Iranian Context: The Case of Prospective Language Teachers. Teaching English Language, 12(1), 61-87.

Khoshsima, H., Shirnejad, A., Farokhipour, S., & Rezaei, J. (2016). Investigating the role of experience in reflective practice of Iranian language teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(6), 1224-1230.

Korthagen, F. A. J. (2014). Promoting core reflection in teacher education: Deepening professional growth. In L. Orland-Barak & C. J. Craig (Eds), International teacher education: Promising pedagogies (Part A) (pp. 73–89). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.

Korthagen, F.A.J. (2016). Pedagogy of teacher education. In J. Loughran & M.L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education, Volume 1 (pp. 311-346). Singapore: Springer Science.

Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers & Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387–405.

Korthagen, F. A. J., Attema-Noordewier, S., & Zwart, R. C. (2014). Teacher-student contact: Exploring a basic but complicated concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 22– 32.

Korthagen, F. A., Kim, Y. M., & Greene, W. L. (Eds.). (2013). Teaching and learning from within: A core reflection approach to quality and inspiration in education. Routledge.

Korthagen, F.A.J. & Nuijten, E.E. (2017). Core reflection approach in teacher education. In: J. Lampert (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education (pp. 189-206) New York: Oxford University Press.

Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 47– 71.

Korthagen F.A.J., Vasalos A. (2010) Going to the Core: Deepening Reflection by Connecting the Person to the Profession. In N. Lyons (Ed), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry (pp. 529-552). Boston, MA: Springer.

Le Nguyen, K. D., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2017). Positive emotions and well-being. In D.S. Dunn (Ed.), Positive psychology: Established and emerging issues (pp. 29-45). USA: Routledge.

Loughran, J., Keast, S., & Cooper, R. (2016). Pedagogical reasoning in teacher education. In J. Loughran, & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 387–421). Singapore: Springer.

Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 586-601.

Lyons, N. (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry. New York: Springer.

MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2019). Setting an agenda for positive psychology in SLA: theory, practice, and research. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 262-274.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design. [2nd Edition]. Routledge.

Marzban, A., & Ashraafi, N. (2016). Assessing reflective thinking skills in EFL/ESL instructors based on differences in graduation degree and nationality. Reflective Practice, 17(6), 681-693.

Riazi, A. M. (2017). Mixed methods research in language teaching and learning. NY: Equinox Publishing.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ruit, P., Korthagen, F., & Schoonenboom, J. (2019). The impact of working with core qualities on primary school pupils’ wellbeing. Educational and Child Psychology, 36(3), 7-17.

Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410.

Turunen, T. A., & Tuovila, S. (2012). Mind the gap. Combining theory and practice in a field experience. Teaching Education, 23(2), 115-130.

Zohrabi,M.,& Yousefi,M.(2016). The relationship between reflective teaching, willingness to communicate, and intrinsic motivation of Iranian advanced learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 4(2).12-28.

Zwart, R. C., Korthagen, F. A., & Attema-Noordewier, S. (2015). A strength-based approach to teacher professional development. Professional Development in Education, 41(3), 579-596.