Divergent Discourses and Public Reactions: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Analysis of Abortion Coverage in Partisan Online News Post-Roe v. Wade Reversal

  ¹ ( Department of English, Isf. C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran )
Marzieh Sharifi Haratmeh ² ( Department of English, Isf. C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran )
Basim  Jubair Kadhim Al-Jameel ³ ( Open Educational College, Najaf Center, Ministry of Education, Najaf, Iraq )
Ehsan Rezvani ⁴ ( Department of English, Isf. C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran )

Submited date : 2025-07-29 Accepted date : 2025-09-17

Keywords: Critical discourse analysis, Media framing, Abortion discourse, Partisan media, Post-Roe v. Wade, Ideological polarization, Public responses.,

Abstract :

 

This study investigates the ideological contours of abortion coverage on partisan online news media following the 2022 Roe v. Wade reversal, with cross-comparison of Democratic-oriented (The New York Times, CNN) and Republican-oriented (The Wall Street Journal, Fox News) media. Drawing on Fairclough’s (2003) three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis, the research applies a mixed-methods approach to investigate framing strategies, syntactic patterns, and public opinion in a sample of 100 articles and 5000 user comments for the years 2023–2024. Findings show that Democratic media sources portray abortion as an issue of personal autonomy and public health with complex syntactic structures that create empathy, while Republican media sources focus on moral absolutism and legal authority using simpler declarative forms. Comments by users capture these cleavages, with Democratic platforms advocating for pro-choice, compassionate opinions and Republican platforms advocating for moral, pro-life opinions, as confirmed by chi-square tests and sentiment analysis. These differences show how partisan media facilitates polarization, shaping public opinion through ideologically crafted narratives. By illuminating the forces of language, ideology, and audience engagement, the current study improves understanding of media’s role in structuring abortion discourse in a post-Roe world with a focus on the need for critical media literacy in battling polarized online environments and informing strategies in creating reasoned public debate.

 

References:

Adamczyk, A., Kim, C., & Dillon, L. (2020). Examining public opinion about abortion: A mixed-methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 920–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12351
Arey, W., Lerma, K., Beasley, A., Harper, L., Moayedi, G., & White, K. (2022). A preview of the dangerous future of abortion bans—Texas Senate Bill 8. New England Journal of Medicine, 387(5), 388–390. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2207423
Bahamonde, J., Bollen, J., Elejalde, E., Ferres, L., & Poblete, B. (2018). Power structure in Chilean news media. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0197150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197150
Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Bromley, P., Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2015). Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the U.S. nonprofit sector. M@n@gement, 15(5), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.155.0469
Cohen, I. G., Adashi, E. Y., & Gostin, L. O. (2021). The Supreme Court, the Texas abortion law (SB8), and the beginning of the end of Roe v Wade? JAMA, 326(15), 1473–1474. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.18434
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deckman, M., Elder, L., Greene, S., & Lizotte, M. (2023). Deceptively stable? How the stability of aggregate abortion attitudes conceals partisan induced shifts. Political Research Quarterly, 77(2), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231220775
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf
Döring, N. (2023). Abortion attitudes (media content, user comments). DOCA - Database of Variables for Content Analysis. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-241004
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
Gearhart, S., Moe, A., & Zhang, B. (2020). Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.185
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7195
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.
Guo, X., Ma, W., & Vosoughi, S. (2022). Measuring media bias via masked language modeling. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16, 1404–1408. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/19396
Guttmacher Institute. (2017). Abortion bans in cases of sex or race selection or genetic anomaly: Harmful and discriminatory. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-bans-cases-sex-or-race-selection-or-genetic-anomaly
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
Hayden, S. (2009). Revitalizing the debate between and : The 2004 March for Women’s Lives. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 6(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420902833189
Hurcombe, E. (2020). Examining the role and significance of emerging social news outlets and their advocacy journalism in the 2017 Australian same-sex marriage postal survey. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11165
Kellner, D., & Share, J. (2019). The critical media literacy guide: Engaging media and transforming education. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004404533
Lambert, V., Loud, E. E., & Billings, D. L. (2023). Qualitative analysis of anti-abortion discourse used in arguments for a 6-week abortion ban in South Carolina. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2023.1147544
Larson, E. R., & Hayes, D. K. (2020). Syntactic strategies in left- and right-leaning news outlets: A corpus-based study. Discourse & Society, 31(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519896185
Lee, E. (2012). That’s not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x
Manninen, B. A. (2023). A critical analysis of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the consequences of fetal personhood. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000904
Martin, Z., Beacken, G. D., Trauthig, I. K., & Woolley, S. C. (2024). Embodied political influencers: How U.S. anti-abortion actors co-opt narratives of marginalization. Social Media + Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241243981
McCammon, H. J., & Beeson-Lynch, C. (2021). Fighting words: Pro-choice cause lawyering, legal-framing innovations, and hostile political-legal contexts. Law & Social Inquiry, 46(3), 599–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.32
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
Niculae, V., Suen, C., Zhang, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2015). Quotus: The structure of political media coverage as revealed by quoting patterns. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2746058
Ntontis, E., & Hopkins, N. (2018). Framing a ‘social problem’: Emotion in anti-abortion activists’ depiction of the abortion debate. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12249
Pagoto, S. L., Palmer, L., & Horwitz-Willis, N. (2023). The next infodemic: Abortion misinformation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e42582. https://doi.org/10.2196/42582
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 697–698). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n350
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2008). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–121). SAGE Publications.
Roth, C. (2023). Abortion access in the Americas: A hemispheric and historical approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1099440
Solon, M., LaRoche, K. J., Bueno, X., Crawford, B. L., Turner, R. C., & Lo, W. (2022). Pro‐choice/pro‐elección versus pro‐life/pro‐vida: Examining abortion identity terms across English and Spanish in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 103(7), 1602–1618. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13222
Thompson, S. E., & Green, M. J. (2018). Framing partisan media coverage: A comparative analysis of CNN and Fox News. Journal of Communication Studies, 69(4), 456–473.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Woodruff, K. (2019). Coverage of abortion in select U.S. newspapers. Women’s Health Issues, 29(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.08.004
Zhang, K., & Qu, G. (2024). A study on the influence of English media on public opinion guidance in international relations. Media and Communication Research, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30564/mcr.v5i1.6225