Effectiveness of Multidimensionality-Based Vs. Hybrid-Based Models on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Ability across Gender

Parisa Farrokhian ¹ ( Department of English Language, To. C., Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran )
Ramin Rahimy ² ( Department of English Language, To. C., Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran )
Mohammadreza Khodareza ³ ( Department of English Language, To. C., Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran )

Submited date : 2025-06-09 Accepted date : 2025-08-14

Keywords: Multidimensional reading instruction, Hybrid learning model, EFL reading comprehension, Iranian intermediate learners, Gender differences in language learning,

Abstract :

This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of multidimensional and hybrid instructional models versus traditional approaches in enhancing reading comprehension among Iranian intermediate EFL learners, with consideration of gender differences. Drawing on Snow’s multidimensional reading framework and Sweller’s Cognitive Load Theory, a quasi-experimental design was employed involving 60 participants out of 120 after administering OPT, who were randomly assigned to multidimensional, hybrid, and control groups. Reading comprehension was assessed using IELTS and British Council passages in pre- and post-tests. Mixed-design ANOVA results revealed that the multidimensional model yielded significantly greater improvement in reading comprehension (mean gain = 3.40 points) compared to the hybrid (0.90 points) and control groups (1.05 points). No significant effects related to gender or interactions between gender and instructional method were observed. These findings suggest that instructional approaches incorporating cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and social dimensions effectively enhance reading comprehension in EFL contexts. The study highlights the practical value of adopting a multidimensional instructional model to facilitate reading comprehension development among Iranian intermediate EFL learners and to guide evidence-based teaching practices in comparable settings.

References:

Al-Khresheh, M. (2023). Virtual classrooms engagement among Jordanian EFL students during the pandemic of COVID-19 period. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2188989

Boyle, K. (2024). A multiple-case study of reading comprehension: How do teachers understand and teach reading comprehension? (Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University). https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/634035

Chen, P. (2020). The Interplay between English Proficiency and Reading Strategy Use in English Reading: Validating the Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis and the Interactive-Compensatory Model. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 17(2), 1–37. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1275321.pdf

Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The Science of Reading Comprehension Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993

Eltaiba, N., Hosseini, S., & Okoye, K. (2025). Benefits and impact of technology-enhanced learning applications in higher education in the Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review. Global Transitions, 7, 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2025.06.004

Hsu, L. (2024). Exploring EFL learners’ acceptance and cognitive absorption at VR-Based language learning: A survey and experimental study. Heliyon, 10(3), e24863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24863

Hung, D. (2011). Multimodal learning: Enhancing reading comprehension through digital tools. Computers & Education, 56(4), 2348–2358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.016

Guerrero, M. (2015). Motivation in second language acquisition. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 23, 349–362.

Klimova, B., & Kacetl, J. (2015). The role of ICT in foreign language education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(1), 1–13.

Lim, H. Y., & Park, H. O. (2023). A Case Study of Developing a Blended Reading Program Using Process Drama for Korean EFL Secondary Students. English Teaching, 78(2), 103-137. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.2.202106.103

Moncada Linares, S., & Díaz Romero, C. (2016). Developing a multidimensional checklist for evaluating language-learning websites coherent with the communicative approach: A path for the knowing-how-to-do enhancement. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 12, 57-93. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume12/IJELLv12p057-093Moncada2161.pdf

Men, Y. (2023). The multimodal English learning strategies, motivation, and engagement among college students in China. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 4(2), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.54097/jeer.v4i2.10834

Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English language teaching, 9(3), 117-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Mohammadi Bazargani, S., Seifoori, Z., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2022). Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perception of Teaching Reading Comprehension and Reading Comprehension Strategies across Gender and Experience. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 14(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2022.7501

Muñoz Melo, A. H., & Guayacán Velasco, L. A. (2018). Developing high school students’ reading comprehension and self-directed learning strategies through the use of digital learning objects (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de La Sabana).

Namaziandost, E., Shafiee, S., & Esfahani, F. R. (2021). The impact of teaching cultural materials on reading motivation and attitude of Iranian Upper-Intermediate EFL Learners. Journal of Language Horizons, 5(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2021.1930923.1275

Nusong, K., & Watanapokakul, S. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning in an EFL undergraduate classroom. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(1), 320-351. https://doi.org/10.70730/JHII1331

Nguyen, T. L. P., & Nguyen, V. N. (2024). Effects of strategy-based instruction on Vietnamese EFL college students’ reading comprehension: A mixed method approach. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24314

Oskarita, E., & Arasy, H. N. (2024). The role of digital tools in enhancing collaborative learning in secondary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v1i1.15

Pakdaman, A., Alibakhshi, G., & Baradaran, A. (2021). Negotiated syllabus and undergraduate students reading comprehension and oral production ability: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2021.6472

Pollitt, A. (2017). Using Professional Judgement to Equate Exam Standards. In the Methodology of educational measurement and assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50856-6_16

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs in English language teaching and learning: A review of the literature. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 78–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p78

Rahmanu, I. W. E. D., & Molnár, G. (2024). Multimodal immersion in English language learning in higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(19), e38357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38357

Sasani, N., Ganji, M., Yarahmadzehi, N. (2018). English major students’ awareness of metacognitive reading strategies: gender and academic level in focus. Issues in Language Teaching, 7(2), 91-119.https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2019.46700.428

Shadiev, R., & Yu, J. (2024). Review of research on computer-assisted language learning with a focus on intercultural education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 841-871.DOI:10.1080/09588221.2022.2056616

Snow, C. (2010). Reading comprehension: Reading for learning. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 413–418). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00510-6

Soudkhah Mohammadi, F., Shayesteh, S., Al Abdwani, T., & Pishghadam, R. (2025). EFL Teacher Concern, Teacher Success, and EFL Learners' Self-efficacy: Learners’ Perspectives. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2025.55255.2707

Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423

Tsegaye, D., & Gezahegn, G. (2024). Challenges and Benefits of Blended Learning in University EFL Reading Comprehension: A Mixed-Method Study. JELITA, 5(2), 374-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v5i2.684

Unsworth, L., & Mills, K. A. (2020). English language teaching of attitude and emotion in digital multimodal composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, Article 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100712

Wang, Y. (2023). Enhancing English reading skills and self-regulated learning through online collaborative flipped classroom: A comparative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1255389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255389

Zhang, C. (2024). Enjoyment and Metacognition of Reading Mediate the Linkage Between Perceived Teacher Support and Chinese Students' Reading Achievement: Insight from a Reanalysis of PISA 2018 Using Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling (Doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Baptist University).