باززنده سازی پارک همسایگی امید با رویکرد ارتقای کیفیت محیطی در محله هفت چنار تهران
محورهای موضوعی : طراحی محیط زیستنگار فروزش 1 , سارا نهیبی 2 , زهرا سادات سعیده زرآبادی 3
1 - کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی طراحی محیط زیست، دانشکده محیط زیست و انرژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم وتحقیقات تهران، ایران
2 - دکترا شهرسازی، استادیار دانشکده محیط زیست و انرژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم وتحقیقات تهران، ایران(مسوول مکاتبات)*
3 - دکترا شهر سازی، استادیار دانشکده هنر و معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم وتحقیقات تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: پارک امید, باززنده سازی, پارک همسایگی, ارتقا کیفیت محیطی, محله هفت چنار,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: باززنده سازی پارک امید با هدف ارتقای کیفیت محیطی و طراحی پایدار صورت پذیرفته است. روش بررسی: برای دست یابی به هدف اصلی که باززنده سازی و ارتقای کیفیت محیط پارک امید است، پس از بازدید میدانی، به مطالعه، جمع آوری موارد مشابه و بررسی کتابخانه‌ای پیرامون هدف پرداخته شد. با استناد به مراجع مرتبط داده های پایه ای مورد نیاز محدوده مطالعاتی تهیه گردید. سامانه داده های جغرافیایی(GIS) ابزاری است که در تحلیل داده های اولیه مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و دست آوردهای آن در فرآیند طراحی بهره گرفته شد. برای شناسایی نیاز و دیدگاه ساکنین و کاربران سایت پرسش نامه هایی تنظیم و توسط ذی نفعان طرح تکمیل گردید. باتوجه به تحلیل داده های مکانی و نظرات کاربران نقاط ضعف، قوت، فرصت و تهدید محدوده‌ی مطالعاتی در این روند شناخته شد و در جدول swot قرار گرفت تا مورد تحلیل قرار گیرد. روند تحقیق حاضر علاوه بر بهره گیری از شیوه کیفی، رویکردهای کمی را نیز مد نظر قرار داده است و از این رو روش تحقیق این مقاله ترکیبی محسوب می گردد. یافته‌ها: رویکرد باززنده سازی استفاده از شیوه هایی برای بهبود و بازیابی پارک های آسیب دیده و تخریب شده، با هدف پایداری و ارتقای محیطی است، از این رو مطالب و معیار های به دست آمده چون ویژگی های فرهنگی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، اقلیمی، استانداردهای پارک های همسایگی پایدار جهت طراحی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و گونه های گیاهی مناسب و طرح متناسب با اهداف باززنده سازی ارایه گردید. این طرح ها می تواند علاوه بر کاهش هزینه نگهداری کیفیت محیطی را ارتقا بخشید و بر میزان رضایت مردم بیافزاید. بحث و نتیجه گیری: دست آورد نهایی این پژوهش می تواند به عنوان راهکاری برای شیوه ی مناسب طراحی پارک های همسایگی به دلیل اهمیت آنان در جذب ساکنین محلی و افزایش ارزش پایداری محیط ومنظر شهری در واحد همسایگی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
Background and Purpose: Omid Park renovation has been performed in order to increase the environmental quality and sustainable design. Method: In order to achieve the main goal, which is to revitalize and improve the quality of the environment of Omid Park, after a field visit, similar items were studied, collected and the libraries around the goal were examined. Based on the relevant references, the basic data required for the study area were prepared. Geographic data system (GIS) is a tool that was used in the analysis of primary data and its achievements were used in the design process. To identify the needs and views of residents and users of the site, questionnaires were prepared and completed by the project stakeholders. According to the analysis of spatial data and users' opinions, the weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats of the study area in this process were identified and placed in the SWOT table to be analyzed. The current research process, in addition to using the qualitative method, has also considered quantitative approaches and therefore the research method of this article is considered a combination. Findings: Regenerative approach includes improvements for damaged parks while increasing stability and environmental quality. Therefore, collected data analysis and resulting standards including cultural, social, economic, ethnicity impact and the neighboring parks standards were used for the design purposes. In addition to reducing maintenance costs, these plans can improve the quality of the environment and increase people's satisfaction. Discussion and conclusion: The result of this research can be used as a quality standard for neighborhood park designs. These designs can increase the population living in the area as well as the long-term value of a sustainable environment and urban landscape.
1. Qudussi, M. 2000. Urban Parks Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, Municipalities, Second Year, No. 21. (In Persian).
2. Abraham, Andrea, Kathrin Sommerhalder, and Thomas Abel. 2009 “Landscape and wellbeing: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor enviroments.” Public Health, 55
3. Balram, S. and C. S. Dragi´cevi´. 2005. “Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71: 147-162
4. Chiesura, A. 2004, “The Role of Urban Park for the Sustainable City”, Wageningen University, Journal of Urban Planning, vol.36.
5. Germann-Chiari, C. and K. Seeland. 2004, “Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research”, Forest Policy and Economics, 6: 3-13.
6. Flores, A. Pickett, S. Zipperer, T. and Pirani, R. 1998, “Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a green space system for the New York City region”, Landsc. Urban Plann, 39: 295–308.
7. Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
8. Morancho, A. B. 2003. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape Urban Plan, 66, 35-41.
9. Golkar, K. 2006. City / Neighborhood Vision, Proposing a Conceptual Framework for Vision Statement Formulation, Journal of Fine Arts, 2006, No. 24. (In Persian).
10. Pakzad, J. 2007. An Intellectual History of Urbanism- From Quantity to Quality. The New Town Development Publication, Tehran. (In Persian).
11. Cohen, N., 2001. Urban Planning Conservation and Preservation, Mc Graw-Hill, USA
12. Cowan, Robert. 2005.The Dictionary of Urbanism,Tisbury,Streetwise press.
13. Urban Task Force; “Towards an urban renaissance”; Department of Environment, Transportation and the Regions, Londo
14. Cook, E.; Vanlier, A. and Hubert, N. 1994. Landscape planning and ecological networks. Amsterdam, Elsevier Pub.
15. Habibi, K, Poorahmad, A, Meshkini, A, 2007, Improvement and Renovation of Ancient Urban Textures, Sanandaj, Kurdistan University and Urban Development and Improvement Organization, West Housing Builders Company. (In Persian).
16. Behbahani, H, 1998. From Yesterday's Gardens to Today's Parks, Municipalities, No. 34. (In Persian).
17. Mofidi, M, Alavizadeh, E, 2010.The Evolution of Visual Approach to Ecology in Urban Parks Design, Manzar Monthly, Issue 10. (In Persian).
18. Sheibani, M, 2001. Homogeneous development of parks and urban green space, Proceedings of educational and research conferences on green space in Tehran, Parks and Green Space Organization of Tehran, Volume 1. (In Persian).
19. Aghamiri, K, 2013. Landscape Architects and Contemporary Environment, Mehr Gol Publications. (In Persian).
20. Bell, S, 2003. Landscape, Pattern, Perception and Process, translated by Behnaz Aminzadeh, University of Tehran. (In Persian).
21. Latifi, A, Sajjadzadeh, H. 2014. Evaluation of the effect of environmental quality components on behavioral patterns in urban parks, Journal of Urban Studies, No. 11, page 7. (In Persian).
22. Rafieian, M, Taghvaei, A, Malahat, A. 2007. An Introduction to Post-Traumatic Reconstruction and the Requirements for Improving the Quality of the Residential Environment, Knowledge Reference Article, pp. 40-41. (In Persian).
23. Journal 203. 2010. Urban Green Space Design Criteria, Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision, Executive Technical Office, Tehran. (In Persian).
24. Habibi, M, Maleki, L. 2011. Environmental Quality Assessment in Urban Neighborhoods: A Case Study of Chizar Neighborhood, Quarterly Journal of Art University, No. 7, Tehran. (In Persian).
25. Fallah, F, Seyedeh, S. 2014. presenting the principles and strategies for revitalizing parks in the old parts of the city, while preserving the historical and cultural identity) Case study: Shahr Park located in Sangalaj neighborhood of Tehran (Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 16, Number 3. (In Persian).
26. Mirzaei, S. 2008. Reconstruction of Urban Parks with a Sustainable Development Attitude, Third National Conference on Green Space and Urban Landscape, Special Issue No. 27, Supplement to Monthly 88. (In Persian).
_||_
1. Qudussi, M. 2000. Urban Parks Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, Municipalities, Second Year, No. 21. (In Persian).
2. Abraham, Andrea, Kathrin Sommerhalder, and Thomas Abel. 2009 “Landscape and wellbeing: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor enviroments.” Public Health, 55
3. Balram, S. and C. S. Dragi´cevi´. 2005. “Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71: 147-162
4. Chiesura, A. 2004, “The Role of Urban Park for the Sustainable City”, Wageningen University, Journal of Urban Planning, vol.36.
5. Germann-Chiari, C. and K. Seeland. 2004, “Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research”, Forest Policy and Economics, 6: 3-13.
6. Flores, A. Pickett, S. Zipperer, T. and Pirani, R. 1998, “Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a green space system for the New York City region”, Landsc. Urban Plann, 39: 295–308.
7. Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
8. Morancho, A. B. 2003. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape Urban Plan, 66, 35-41.
9. Golkar, K. 2006. City / Neighborhood Vision, Proposing a Conceptual Framework for Vision Statement Formulation, Journal of Fine Arts, 2006, No. 24. (In Persian).
10. Pakzad, J. 2007. An Intellectual History of Urbanism- From Quantity to Quality. The New Town Development Publication, Tehran. (In Persian).
11. Cohen, N., 2001. Urban Planning Conservation and Preservation, Mc Graw-Hill, USA
12. Cowan, Robert. 2005.The Dictionary of Urbanism,Tisbury,Streetwise press.
13. Urban Task Force; “Towards an urban renaissance”; Department of Environment, Transportation and the Regions, Londo
14. Cook, E.; Vanlier, A. and Hubert, N. 1994. Landscape planning and ecological networks. Amsterdam, Elsevier Pub.
15. Habibi, K, Poorahmad, A, Meshkini, A, 2007, Improvement and Renovation of Ancient Urban Textures, Sanandaj, Kurdistan University and Urban Development and Improvement Organization, West Housing Builders Company. (In Persian).
16. Behbahani, H, 1998. From Yesterday's Gardens to Today's Parks, Municipalities, No. 34. (In Persian).
17. Mofidi, M, Alavizadeh, E, 2010.The Evolution of Visual Approach to Ecology in Urban Parks Design, Manzar Monthly, Issue 10. (In Persian).
18. Sheibani, M, 2001. Homogeneous development of parks and urban green space, Proceedings of educational and research conferences on green space in Tehran, Parks and Green Space Organization of Tehran, Volume 1. (In Persian).
19. Aghamiri, K, 2013. Landscape Architects and Contemporary Environment, Mehr Gol Publications. (In Persian).
20. Bell, S, 2003. Landscape, Pattern, Perception and Process, translated by Behnaz Aminzadeh, University of Tehran. (In Persian).
21. Latifi, A, Sajjadzadeh, H. 2014. Evaluation of the effect of environmental quality components on behavioral patterns in urban parks, Journal of Urban Studies, No. 11, page 7. (In Persian).
22. Rafieian, M, Taghvaei, A, Malahat, A. 2007. An Introduction to Post-Traumatic Reconstruction and the Requirements for Improving the Quality of the Residential Environment, Knowledge Reference Article, pp. 40-41. (In Persian).
23. Journal 203. 2010. Urban Green Space Design Criteria, Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision, Executive Technical Office, Tehran. (In Persian).
24. Habibi, M, Maleki, L. 2011. Environmental Quality Assessment in Urban Neighborhoods: A Case Study of Chizar Neighborhood, Quarterly Journal of Art University, No. 7, Tehran. (In Persian).
25. Fallah, F, Seyedeh, S. 2014. presenting the principles and strategies for revitalizing parks in the old parts of the city, while preserving the historical and cultural identity) Case study: Shahr Park located in Sangalaj neighborhood of Tehran (Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 16, Number 3. (In Persian).
26. Mirzaei, S. 2008. Reconstruction of Urban Parks with a Sustainable Development Attitude, Third National Conference on Green Space and Urban Landscape, Special Issue No. 27, Supplement to Monthly 88. (In Persian).