On the Relationship between Iranian EFL Teachers’ Grammar Teaching Beliefs and Their Professional Development

Subject Areas :

Khalegh Setoodeh ¹ (phd candidate, Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)
Esmaeil Jadidi ² (Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)
Ehsan Rassaei ³ (Department of English, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)

Received: 2022-09-24 Accepted : 2023-06-17 Published : 2023-04-01

Keywords: Teachers’ grammar beliefs, Teachers’ professional development, Self-regulated teachers, Other-regulated teachers,

Abstract :

L2 research, during the last two decades, has almost abandoned studying the appropriacy of methodologies and techniques to focus more on the underlying derives for teachers’ pedagogical decision makings inside the class. This study, in line with the recent trend, is designed and conducted to determine the relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and their professional development. In so doing, a Likert scale 24-item grammar belief questionnaire developed by Mohamed (2006) and a professional development questionnaire developed by Jadidi and Bagheri (2014) were administered to 177 Iranian EFL teachers. The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. The results revealed that teachers are currently more inclined toward communicative based activities which focus on grammar instruction in their classroom. Finally, the results showed that Iranian EFL teachers are professionally self-regulated.

References:

References

 

Abelson, R. P. (1979).  Differences between belief & knowledge systems. Cognitive Science, 3(4), 355–366.

Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Azar, B. (2007a). Grammar-based teaching: A practitioner's perspective. TESL-EJ.

Bellalem, F. (2015). The study of foreign language teachers’ beliefs: implications for research in the Arab world. English Lingua Journal, 1(1), 91-106.

Borg, S. (1998a). Talking about grammar in the foreign language classroom. Language Awareness, 7(4), 159-175. 

Borg, S. (1998b). Teachers' pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: a qualitative
study. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 9-38.

Borg, S. (1999a). Studying teacher cognition in second language grammar teaching.System, 27(1), 19-31.

Borg, S. (1999b). Teachers' theories in grammar teaching. ELT Journal, 53(3), 157-
167.

Borg, S. (1999c). The use of grammatical terminology in the second language
classroom: a qualitative study of teachers' practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 95-126.

Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception & practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55(1), 21−9.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, & do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.

Borg, S. (2005). Experience, knowledge about language & classroom practice in teaching grammar. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics & language teacher education (pp. 325-340). New York: Springer.

Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition & language education. London: Continuum.

 

Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39, 370-380.

Borg, S. (2012). Interview “Teacher cognition & language teacher education: beliefs & practice”. A conversation with Simon Borg. Berratella Journal of Language Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 5 (2), 88-94.

 

Borg, S. (2015). Researching teacher beliefs. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 487-504). London: Bloomsbury.

 

Borg, S. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. In P. Garrett & J. Cots (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 75-91). London: Routledge.

 

Borg, S. (2018). Teacher evaluation: Global perspectives and their implications for English language teaching. A literature review. Delhi: British Council.

 

Borg, S., & Sanchez, H. S. (2020). Cognition and good language teachers. In C. Griffiths & Z. Tajeddin (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 16-27). Cambridge University Press

Brumfit, C., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1996). Grammar, language and classroom practice. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times. Oxford: Blackwell.

Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus on grammatical form: explicit or implicit? System, 30, 433-458.

Burns, A. (1990). Focus on language in the communicative classroom. In G. Brindley (Ed.), The second language curriculum in action. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Learning.

Çapan, S. A. (2014). Pre-service English as a Foreign language teachers' belief development about grammar instruction. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,
39(12), 131-152.

Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Harmer, J., (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching, third edition. London, Longman.

Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The Essentials of Effective Professional Development: A New Consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Jadidi, E., & Bagheri, M.S. (2014). ELT pre-service teacher education: Major trends and shifts. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World,7(4), 181-190.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (1^st ed.).
Oxford; New York: Pergamum).

Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.

Mohamed, N. (2006). An exploratory study of the interplay between teachers’ beliefs, instructional practices & professional development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Auckland, Auckland.

Pennington, M.C. (1992). “Reflecting on teaching and learning: A developmental focus for the

          “Reflecting on teaching and learning: second language classroom.” In J. Flowerdew, M.

           Brock, & S. Hsia (eds.)   Perspectives on Second Language Teacher Education (47-65).      Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.

 

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs & educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J.
Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd Edition ed., pp.
102-119). New York: Macmillan.

Richards, J. C., Gallo, P. B., & Renandya, W. A. (2001). Exploring teachers' beliefs
and the processes of change. The PAC Journal, 1(1), 41-62.

Sanchez, H. S. (2012). The impact of self- perceived subject matter knowledge on pedagogical decisions in EFL grammar teaching practices. Language Awareness, 23 (3), 220-233

Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students' and
teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343-364.

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions
concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258.

Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching, Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge       University Press.

Wilson, S. M. (2011). Effective stem teacher preparation, induction, & professional development. Journal of Teacher Education.