اعتبارسنجی مدل دارایی های نامشهود سازمان در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان فارس با رویکرد تفسیری ساختاری
کبری شریعتی منش
1
(
دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران
)
عباداله احمدی
2
(
استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.
)
رضا زارعی
3
(
استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.
)
نادر شهامت
4
(
مدیریت آموزشی- دانشکده علوم تربتی- دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت
)
کلید واژه: دارایی, دارایی نامشهود, دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه و هدف: امروزه دارایی های نامشهود در دانشگاه ها نقش بسیار مهمی در تعیین جایگاه و موفقیت آنها در محیط های علمی، آموزشی و فرهنگی دارند و تمرکز بر آنها و شناسایی تاثیرگذاری آنها بر فرایندهای آموزشی ضرورت دارد. لذا هدف این تحقیق اعتبارسنجی مدل دارایی نامشهود در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان فارس با رویکرد تفسیری ساختاری می باشد.
روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر به لحاظ هدف کاربردي، بر حسب نحوه ي گردآوري داده ها، توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی است. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با رویکرد تفسیری ساختاری باروش ماتريس ضرايب تحليل اثر متقاطع می باشد.روش نمونه گیری ، هدفمند و گلوله برفی است که مشارکت کنندگان آن مدیران تصمیم گیرنده و سیاست گذار در حوزه مدیریت آموزشی، مدیریت دولتی، مدیریت استراتژیک و مدیریت مالی می باشند. به عبارت دیگر برای انتخاب تیم تفسیری ساختاری، روش نمونه گیری هدفمند استفاده شده است. معیارهای انتخاب خبرگان تسلط نظری، تجربه عملی، تمایل و توانایی مشارکت در پژوهش و دسترسی است. تعداد خبرگان شرکت کننده در رویکرد تفسیری ساختاری ، 25 تن از خبرگان در حوزه ی منابع انسانی، رفتارسازمانی، آموزش انتخاب شده است. درادامه کلیه متغیرهایی که در دارایی های نامشهود دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی موثر بوده اند برای جلب نظر خبرگان ارسال شده است. تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها با رویکرد تفسیری ساختاری و روش ماتريس ضرايب تحليل اثر متقاطع می باشد.
یافته ها: طبق یافته های تحقیق، مولفه های ارزشهای اخلاقی، رفتار شهروندی، هوش فرهنگی، فرهنگ یادگیری، تکریم ارباب رجوع، فرهنگ کار تیمی، دارایی ارتباطی، تجاری سازی دانش و عملیات سازمانی بیشتر تحت تأثیر سایر عوامل بوده و از منظر سیستمی جزء عناصر اثرپذیر و وابسته هستند. در این تحقیق شایستگی فردی جزء متغیرهای مستقل می باشد. متغیرهای کلیدی یا تاثیرگذار، شامل متغیرهایی چون ویژگی های روانشناختی، محتوای آموزشی، رهبری آموزشی، بهره وری علمی، شایستگی استراتژیک، ثبت اختراع می باشند که جزء متغیرهای کلیدی به شمار می‌روند. این متغیرها تأثیر بسیاری بر سایر متغیرها دارند.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: با در نظر گرفتن جایگاه متغیرهای مرتبط با دارایی های نامشهود می توان عملکرد فرایندهای آموزشی و پژوهشی در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی را تقویت نمود.
چکیده انگلیسی :
Introduction: Today, intangible assets in universities play a very important role in determining their position and success in scientific, educational and cultural environments, and it is necessary to focus on them and identify their impact on educational processes. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to validate the intangible asset model in the Islamic Azad University of Fars province with a structural interpretation approach.
Research Methodology: The current research is a descriptive survey in terms of its practical purpose, according to the method of data collection. Data analysis with Baroosh's structural interpretation approach is the matrix of cross-effect analysis coefficients. The sampling method is purposeful and snowball, the participants of which are decision makers and policy makers in the field of educational management, public management, strategic management and financial management. are In other words, the purposeful sampling method was used to select the structural interpretation team. The selection criteria of experts are theoretical mastery, practical experience, willingness and ability to participate in research and access. The number of experts participating in the structural interpretation approach, 25 experts in the field of human resources, organizational behavior, and education have been selected. In the following, all the variables that have been effective in the intangible assets of Islamic Azad University have been sent to attract the opinion of experts. The data analysis is based on the structural interpretation approach and the cross-effect analysis coefficients matrix method.
Findings: According to the findings of the research, the components of moral values, citizenship behavior, cultural intelligence, learning culture, respect for clients, teamwork culture, communication assets, commercialization of knowledge and organizational operations are more influenced by other factors and from a systemic perspective. They are effective and dependent elements. In this research, individual competence is one of the independent variables. Key or influential variables include variables such as psychological characteristics, educational content, educational leadership, scientific productivity, strategic competence, patents, which are considered key variables. These variables have a lot of influence on other variables.
Conclusion:By considering the position of variables related to intangible assets, the performance of educational and research processes in Islamic Azad University can be strengthened.
Abbaszadeh, M., Bani F., Hossein, Alizadeh Aghdam, M. B., Budaghi, A. (2016). The underlying factors of adherence to research ethics among graduate students; The case of Tabriz University. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 79(22), 75-98. (In Persian).
Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408-422.
Amiri, H. and Momeni, A. (2022). The impact of intangible assets on the relationship between company growth and the value of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and management perspective. 5(74), 13-26(In Persian).
Anbardar, J. and Firouzabadi, K. (2017). Identifying and investigating the impact of intangible assets dimensions of intellectual capital on the process of business organization and evaluation (case study: oil industry of the Islamic Republic of Iran). Applied Researches in Technology and Engineering, 10(2), 47-72.(In Persian).
Bontis, N. (1999). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows of knowledge: An empirical examination of intellectual capital, knowledge management, and business performance.
Bontis, N., Chua Chong Keow, W., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of intellectual capital, 1(1), 85-100.
Brandt, E. & Kull, P. (2007). Talent Management: How firms is Sweden find and nurture value adding human resources. Internationals Handelshogskolan.
Buller, P, F & McEvoy, G, M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human Resource Manage
Cardenas, A. S., García, F. J. G., & Moreno, J. R. G. (2024). Disclosure, recognition and importance of intangible assets as factors of business success. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations, 2, 313-313. doi: 10.56294/piii2024313
Cárdenas, M., & Campos-Blázquez, J. R. (2023). Towards an integrated definition of job crafting. Intangible Capital, 19(1), 42-54.
Castilla-Polo, F., & Ruiz-Rodriguez, C. (2017). Content analysis within intangible assets disclosure: a structured literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
Charan, P., Shankar, R., & Baisya, R. K. (2008). Analysis of interactions among the variables of supply chain performance measurement system implementation. Business Process Management Journal.
Corrado, S., & Sala, S. (2018). Food waste accounting along global and European food supply chains: State of the art and outlook. Waste management, 79, 120-131.
Deliriyan, A., Meshki Miyaoghi, M., Mohammadi Nodeh, F., Khordiar, S. (2018). The end of the current way of reporting intangible assets: the need to start a new approach. Knowledge of Accounting and Management Audit 8(32), 259-372. (In Persian).
Dumay, J., & Garanina, T. (2013). Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 10-25.
Faisal, M. N., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal.
Hachicha, W., & Elmsalmi, M. (2014). An integrated approach based-structural modeling for risk prioritization in supply network management. Journal of Risk Research, 17(10), 1301-1324.
Hadizadeh, A. Rahimi Filabadi, F. (2012). Organizational entrepreneurship. Tehran, Janan Publishing House. (In Persian).
Hashemi, M., Mohammad Khani, K. (2015). Presenting the evaluation model of faculty competencies in the Islamic Azad University system (case of study: units of the Islamic Azad University of Fars province). A new approach in educational management, 28(7), 185-210. (In Persian).
He, S. (2016, July). Research on the Intangible Assets Management Systems of University. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2016) (pp. 450-453). Atlantis Press.
Hintzmann, C., Lladós-Masllorens, J., & Ramos, R. (2021). Intangible assets and labor productivity growth. Economies, 9(2), 82.
Hudson, W. J. (1993). Intellectual capital: How to build it, enhance it, use it. Wiley. Khaki, I., Mirspasi, N., Montazer Ataei, M. and Erfanian Khanzadeh, H. (2022). Future research of cultural intelligence with a scenario-building approach. Management Futures, 3(130). (In Persian).
Laguna Sánchez, P., & Segovia Pérez, M. (2023). Higher education: a Fundamental intangible capital towards a sustainable future. Intangible Capital, 19(1), 1-3.
Luthans, F. Avolio, B, J. Avey, J, B & Norman, S, M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
Mantazare Ataei, Mahbobeh. (2018). Analyzing the policy making process in the education system of Islamic Azad University of Iran. Doctoral dissertation in educational management, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur branch. (In Persian).
Mashayikhi, B. and Birami, H. (2017). Presenting the measurement model of intangible assets in Iran. Financial Accounting Research, 10(3), 45-68. (In Persian).
Montazer Ataei, M., Akbari, A., Cherabin, M., and Karimi, M. (2019). Social entrepreneurship, a new approach in the education system policy of Islamic Azad University of Mashhad branch. A new approach in educational management, 11(46), 223-242. (In Persian).
Moses, A, R. (2012). Understanding the relationship of job embeddedness whit social and human capital: The importance of organizational identification. Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The University of Texas at Arlington, United States.
Nadi, M., Ahanchian, M. R., Noghani Dekht Bahmani, M. and Shoja, K.. (2015). Qualitative analysis of Khorasan higher education administrators' view on team building and university kartim (case study: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad). Khorasan Social Cultural Studies, 11(2), 161-133. (In Persian).
Ng, T, W & Feldman, D, C. (2010). The effects of organizational embeddedness on development of social capital and human capital. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 496-712.
Oh, H, S. Chung, M, H & Lbianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness. The academy of management journal, 147(6), 860.
Omodan, B. I. (2024). Redefining university infrastructure for the 21st century: An interplay between physical assets and digital evolution. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(4), 3468. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i4.3468
Saadabadi, A. A., Ramezani, S., Fartash, K. (2019). Drawing and analyzing the scientific map of intangible assets using research indexed in scientific databases. Knowledge recovery and semantic systems quarterly. 7(25), 33-65. (In Persian).
Samino García, R. (2023). A service-learning program assessment: Strengths, weaknesses and impacts on students. Intangible Capital, 19(1), 4-24.
Schmeltz, L. (2014). Identical or just compatible? The utility of corporate identity values in communicating corporate social responsibility. International Journal of business communication, 5(3):234-258.
Secundo, G., Margherita, A., Elia, G., & Passiante, G. (2010). Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?. Journal of intellectual capital. Sepherdoost, H. 2006, the position of intellectual capital in the stock exchange companies, political and economic magazine, number 273. (In Persian).
Silpa-Archa, S., Lee, J. J., & Foster, C. S. (2016). Ocular manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 100(1), 135-141.
Takizawa, C., Thompson, P. L., van Walsem, A., Faure, C., & Maier, W. C. (2015). Epidemiological and economic burden of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic literature review of data across Europe and the United States of America. Journal of Alzheimer's disease, 43(4), 1271-1284.
Thien, T. H., & Hung, N. X. (2023). Intangible investments and cost of equity capital: An empirical research on Vietnamese firms. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2163075.
Valença, P. H. L., & de Lima, A. C. (2023). The most relevant intangible assets in generating value in creative economy companies. REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL-Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte-ISSN 2176-9036, 15(1).
Wei, Y, C. (2014). The benefits of organizational citizenship behavior for job performance and the moderating role of human capital. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol 9, No 7, Pp 87-99.
Zakersalehi, Gholamreza. (2012). Investigating the legal potential of academic autonomy in Iran. Iranian Journal of Higher Education, No. 20, 23-55. (In Persian).